Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Spektor D.M. Metaphysics of the Cult and the Culture of 'Homo Numinosum'

Abstract: "Humanity" doesn't descend from heavens with the Holy Spirit but comes through real animals (ancestors of the mankind) led by instincts. Humanity developed as a result of the need to release from total domination of reflex reactions, on the one hand, and opportunities predetermined by their phenotype, on the other hand. These were the real conditions of creation of the first historical form of culture – the cult. Involvement in cult actions transformed our ancestor into human, consciousness being one of his attributes.  Reconstruction of the initial forms of cult is based on successive comparison of ritual practices with the sensuality genesis separating human from animal as a being with a completely different perception of the world and feelings. As a new form of experience, cult (of motives, values, and derived emotions) sets priorities for the relations above material communications (thus creating its own "virtuality") and is a result of the defensive instinct when man began to focus on community values (as the way to general survival) and was deprived of established mechanisms of behavior, and therefore had to be based on common reactions and community relations. 


Keywords:

cult, culture, affects, emotions, Numinosum, archaic thinking, magic, sacral, the unconscious, homo sentiens


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Belyaev V.A. Krizis interkul'tury i «stolknovenie tsivilizatsiy» // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-8.-C. 117-146. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.8.662. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_662.html.
2. Koptseva N.P. Sovremennye kul'turnye praktiki sokhraneniya etnicheskoy identichnosti korennykh narodov Severa, Sibiri i Dal'nego Vostoka v Respublike Buryatiya // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva.-2014.-1.-C. 17-30. DOI: 10.7256/2306-1618.2014.1.10989. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_10989.html
3. Weidkuhn P. Aggressivität und Normativität//Anthropos. 1968—1969. Vol. 63/64. Fasz. 3-4.
4. Firth R. Essays on social organization and values. London, 1964.
5. Reimann R. Der Schamane sieht eine Hexe – der Ethnologe sieht nichts. Frankfurt/ Main., 1998.
6. Durkheim E. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. – L., 1915.
7. Yung K. G. Eon. Issledovanie o simvolike samosti. – M.; 2009.
8. Bourguignon E. Psychological anthropology. – N.Y.; 1979.
9. Eliade M. Ocherki sravnitel'nogo religiovedeniya. – M.; 1999.
10. Freska E., Kyul'sar S. Sotsial'nye svyazi v modulyatsii fiziologii ritual'nogo transa // Lichnost', kul'tura, etnos: sovremennaya psikhologicheskaya antropologiya. – M.; 2001.
11. Frezer Dzh. Zolotaya vetv'. – M.; 2006.
12. Tsiv'yan T. V. K semantike prostranstvennykh i vremennykh pokazateley v fol'klore // Sb. statey po vtorichnym modeliruyushchim sistemam. – Tartu.; 1973.
13. Spektor D.M. Vlast' vremeni. – M.; 2009.
14. Spektor D.M. Istoricheskie korni dramaticheskoy poetiki. // NB: Filologicheskie issledovaniya. — 2013.-¹ 4.-S.100-135.
15. Tokarev S. A. Rannie formy religii. – M.; 1990.
16. Teylor E.B. Pervobytnaya kul'tura. – M.; 1989.
17. Semenov Yu. I. Kak vozniklo chelovechestvo. – Moskva.; 1966.
18. Saringulyan K. S. O regulyativnykh aspektakh kul'turnoy traditsii // SE. 1981. ¹ 2.
19. Saringulyan. K. S. Kul'tura i regulyatsiya deyatel'nosti. – Erevan, 1986.
20. Rouz F. Aborigeny Avstralii. Traditsionnoe obshchestvo. – M.; 1989.
21. Materialisty Drevney Gretsii. – M.; 1955.
22. Pershits, A. I. Problemy normativnoy etnografii // Issledovaniya po obshchey etnografii. M., 1979.
23. Marett R. Formula tabu-mana kak minimum opredeleniya religii // Mistika. Religiya. Nauka. Klassiki mirovogo religiovedeniya. M., 1998.
24. Malinovskiy B. Magiya, nauka, religiya. – M. 1996.
25. Lorents K. Oborotnaya storona zerkala. – M.; 1988.
26. Levi-Bryul' L. Sverkh'estestvennoe v pervobytnom myshlenii. – M.; 1994.
27. Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form. T.2. Mifologicheskoe myshlenie. – M.; 2001.
28. Vul'f K. K genezisu sotsial'nogo. Mimezis, performativnost', ritual. SPb.; 2009.
29. Godel'e M. Zagadka dara. – M.; 2007.
30. Golovnev A. V. Antropologiya dvizheniya (drevnosti severnoy Evrazii). – Ekaterinburg.; 2009.
31. Antropologicheskie matritsy KhKh veka. L.S. Vygotskiy – P.A. Florenskiy. Nesostoyavshiysya dialog. – M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2007.
32. Boroday Yu. M. Ot fantazii k real'nosti. – M.; 1995.
33. Shazhinbatyn A.. Etnoantropologicheskaya kontseptsiya Zh.-Zh. Russo. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2014.-¹ 1.-C. 123-131. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2014.1.10103.
34. Tkhor V.V.. Britanskaya musul'manskaya identichnost' v usloviyakh mul'tikul'turalizma. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2014.-¹ 1.-C. 89-98. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2014.1.9815.
35. Gurevich P.S.. Pervoobrazy kul'tury. // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya.-2013.-¹ 4.-C. 335-343. DOI: .10.7256/2305-6177.2013.4.10480.
36. Kiyashchenko N.I.. Nulevaya identichnost'. // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2013.-¹ 12.-C. 1747-1756. DOI: .10.7256/1999-2793.2013.12.10317.