Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Administrative and municipal law
Reference:

Chezhidova A.V. Transparency as a necessary condition for the work of supervisory bodies of executive authorities

Abstract: The work of regulatory authorities is a priority for any modern state. During the last decade the Russian Federation is trying to improve the enforcement agencies by conducting large-scale administrative reforms, introduction of modern governance mechanisms and use of experience of the advanced Western countries. There is no doubt that the effectiveness of supervisory bodies depends not only on security and law and order, protection of rights and freedoms of citizens, their social well-being, but, importantly, on the decrease of corruption and crime in the country, as ineffective and corrupt practices of enforcement agencies damage the economy of the country, the development of small and medium-sized businesses, destroy the initiative of the population in the development of various social processes aimed at improvement of the welfare of our country, and are of great distrust and disrespect for the public authorities and their officials.The solution of these most difficult tasks is impossible without close cooperation of public authorities and civil society. Therefore, the duty of the state is to create the necessary mechanisms for such collaboration, to secure them in the current legislation and to ensure the correct implementation of the established principles and rules.


Keywords:

supervisory body, civil society, mass media, transparency of pubic authorities, government supervision, Executive power, information society, corruption, public administration, information


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Obshchestvennoe doverie k organam gosudarstvennoy vlasti: vyyavlenie problem i predlozheniya po ikh resheniyu: Nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie / Pod red. A.V. Martynova. – N.Novgorod: Izd-vo Nizhegorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, 2013. – 210 s.
2. Tikhomirov Yu.A. Sovremennoe publichnoe pravo: monograficheskiy uchebnik. – M.: Eksmo, 2008. S.111.
3. Starilov Yu.N. Administrativnoe pravo: V 2 ch. Ch.1: Istoriya. Nauka. Predmet. Normy. – Voronezh: VGU, 1998. S.361-362
4. Kozlov Yu.M. Administrativnoe pravo: Uchebnik. – M.: Yurist', 2007. S.246.
5. Worldwide Governance Indicators, 2013 // http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#countryReports
6. Indeks vospriyatiya korruptsii – 2013: usiliy vlasti nedostatochno, chtoby izmenit' polozhenie. Ofitsial'nyy sayt Transperensi Interneshnl Rossiya // http://www.transparency.org.ru/indeks-vospriiatiia-korruptcii/zastriali.
7. Rossiya svobodna o svobody. Rossiya v reytinge ekonomicheskikh svobod mezhdu Komorami i Gvineey // Gazeta.Ru. 2015. 28 yanvarya (http://gazeta.ru/business/2015/01/28/6390417.shtml
8. Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 25 oktyabrya 2005 g. ¹1789-r (v red. ot 10.03.2009 g.) «O Kontseptsii administrativnoy reformy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii v 2006 – 2010 godakh» // SZ RF. 2005. ¹46. St.4720.
9. Nikolaev I. V reytinge ekonomicheskoy svobody Rossiya zanyala 140-e mesto // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2014. 21 yanvarya. (http://www.rg.ru/2014/01/21/rossiya.html
10. Grazhdanin, zakon i publichnaya vlast'. – M.: Norma, 2005. S.157
11. Rossiya svobodna o svobody. Rossiya v reytinge ekonomicheskikh svobod mezhdu Komorami i Gvineey // Gazeta.Ru. 2015. 28 yanvarya (http://gazeta.ru/business/2015/01/28/6390417.shtml