Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Spektor D.M. Evolution: the Attempt of a Positive Ontological Interpetation

Abstract: The drivers of human evolution are still one of the darkest points in the anthropogenesis theory. From the point of view of the representatives of positive science, human is a part of nature and therefore unconditionally obeys the laws of nature. The obvious axiom of philosophy is that human has a single essence. In his article Spektor raises the following question: what are the reasons why human has such an essence? Therefore, the research subject of the present article is a theoretical justification of the reasons of the unity of humankind. Noteworthy that such reasons can be found in actual conditions of the descent of man. The research methodology involves monism as the most general principle as well as methods of dialectical logic combined with the analysis or critics of references. The author shows that a sucessive scientific interpretation of the question about the unity of the mankind brings us to the following conclusion: human has to adjust to a very singular environment. This is the kind of environment that has a high level of the internal coherence so all the living creatures have to mutually adjust to one another. So human evolution is a type of specific universalization and constant competition inside their environmental niche. These are the external drivers of 'hominization'. The internal drivers include the initiation of the defensive insinct that have been going on for thousands of years. 


Keywords:

anthropogenesis, evolution, mankind unity, adaptation, homo sapiens sapiens, evolutionism, initiation, cult, sacrifice, culture


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Kanasz T.. Rol' nadezhdy i optimizma v sovremennoy kul'ture // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva.-2013.-5.-C. 47-69. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_10114.html
2. Belyaev V.A. Krizis interkul'tury i kul'turnye remissii // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-7.-C. 580-617. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_557.html
3. Belyaev V.A. K idee interkul'tury // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-5.-C. 309-346. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_443.html
4. Zuckerman S. The Social Life of Monkeys and Apes. L., 1932.
5. Lovejoy S. O. 2009. Reexamining Numan Origins in Light of Ardipithecus ramidus // Science. V. 326.
6. Serge Moscovici, La societe contre nature; UGE 10/18, Paris., 1972. Moskovichi, v chastnosti, dokazyvaet, chto «okhotnik stanovitsya chelovekom, no ne chelovek – okhotnikom»,
7. Franz M. Evolution. Die Entwicklung des Lebens. – München., 2002.
8. Semenov Yu. I. Kak vozniklo chelovechestvo. – Moskva, 1966.
9. Tokarev S. A. Rannie formy religii. – M. 1990.
10. Christoph Wulf. Anthropologie. Geschichte. Kultur. Philosophie. – Hamburg., 2004. „Die Hominisation ist das Ergebnis des Zusammenwirkens einer Reihe von Faktoren, in denen sich natürliche und kulturelle Elemente überlagern und sich so eng miteinander verschränken, dass eine neue, für den Menschen charakteristische Komplexität entsteht“, zu der folgende Faktoren beitragen: Gehirn, Hände und Werkzeuge, Nahrung und Lebensraum, Feuer und Jagd, Sprache und Kultur“.
11. Blaisdell A . R., Sawa K., Leising K. J . , Waldmann M. R . 2006. Causal Reasoning in Rats // Science. V. 311.
12. Reznikova Zh. I. 2009. Kognitivnoe povedenie zhivotnykh, ego adaptatsionnaya funktsiya i zakonomernosti formirovaniya. – // Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Psikhologiya. T.3.• Vyp. 2. http://www.reznikova.net/Psyo9.pdf
13. Rouz F. Aborigeny Avstralii. Traditsionnoe obshchestvo. – M., 1989, S.71.
14. Koshman L.V. Kul'turnoe prostranstvo russkogo goroda XIX – nachala XX vv. K voprosu o kreativnosti istoricheskoy pamyati. // NB: Kul'tury i iskusstva.-2013.-2.-C. 42-115. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_639.html
15. Rapoport A. Mir — sozrevshaya ideya. Darmshtadt: «Darmshtadt Bletter», 1993. S. 88.
16. Propp V. Ya. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoy skazki. – Leningrad, 1986.
17. Palmer D., Palmer L. Evolyutsionnaya psikhologiya. Sekrety povedeniya Homo sapiens.
18. Nazaretyan A. P.. «Tsivilizatsionnye krizisy v kontekste universal'noy istorii».– M., 2004.
19. Markov A. Evolyutsiya cheloveka. Kn. 1. Obez'yany, kosti i geny. – M., 2011.
20. Moos M. Sotsial'nye funktsii svyashchennogo. – Sankt-Peterburg, 2000.
21. Lorents K. Oborotnaya storona zerkala. – M., 1988.
22. Malinovskiy B. Magiya, nauka i religiya. M., 1993.
23. Darvin Ch. Sochineniya. M., 1953. T. V.
24. Istoriya pervobytnogo obshchestva. Obshchie voprosy. Problemy antroposotsiogeneza. M., Nauka, 1983.
25. Boroday Yu. M. Ot fantazii k real'nosti. M., 1995. S. 205.
26. Golovnev A. V. Antropologiya dvizheniya (drevnosti severnoy Evrazii). Ekaterinburg, 2009.
27. Alekseev V. P. Stanovlenie chelovechestva. – Moskva., 1984.
28. Anikovich M. V., Anisyutkin N. K., Vishnyatskiy L. B. Uzlovye problemy perekhoda k verkhnemu paleolitu v Evrazii. – SPb., 2007.
29. Shchuplenkov O.V., Shchuplenkov N.O. Natsional'no-kul'turnaya identichnost' v kontekste filosofskoy traditsii dialoga kul'tur // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2013.-10.-C. 183-244. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_8848.html .
30. V.V. Kornil'ev. Ot besporyadka k kollektivnomu bessoznatel'nomu. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2013.-¹ 4.-C. 360-370. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.04.7.
31. I.K. Asadullaev. Totem the Donkey. A hypothesis About Unification of Aryan Clans and Tribes is Confirmed?. // SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.-2013.-¹ 2.-C. 102-113. DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2013.2.9433.
32. Gurevich, P. S.. The phenomenon of spirit in philosophical understanding of man. // SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.-2013.-¹ 1.-C. 4-842. DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2013.1.8932.
33. Spirova, E.M.. Why do we need history?. // SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.-2013.-¹ 1.-C. 23-27. DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2013.1.9019.