Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Boyko, M. E. Character Reduction: Characters of Actors in Factual and Imaginary Discourses

Abstract: The article contains a logical summary of the term ‘character’. The definition offered by the author of the article allows to apply this term not only to people but also to actors, both factual and imaginary ones. This outlines a new field of research called the ‘actor character analysis’ and establishes a framework for structural-hermeneutic analysis of actors’ characters. It has been proved that a necessary stage in each procedure for defining human character is character reduction, i.e. reduction of all variety of character features to a particular discrete set of features. This new approach casts light on nature and functions of character reduction. No matter how many discrete character features we define by using formalized and poorly formalized methods, this is just a tiny drop in the bottomless ocean. Continual character contents cannot be studied even by the most thorough discrete analysis and described by natural verbal language. Only character reduction allows to cover the logical gap between the discrete and the continual.


Keywords:

psychology, actor, diagnostics of character, hermeneutics, psychological diagnostics (psychodiagnostics), psychodiagnotic methods, structuralism, character, character feature, actor character analysis.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Adler A. Nauka o kharakterakh: Ponyat' prirodu cheloveka. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2011.
2. Bartashev A. V. Temperament i kharakter: Psikhologicheskaya diagnostika. M.: VLADOS-PRESS, 2001.
3. Batarshev A. V. Tipologiya kharaktera i lichnosti. M.: Izd-vo instituta psikhoterapii, 2005.
4. Belyanin V. P. Psikhologicheskoe literaturovedenie: Tekst kak otrazhenie vnutrennikh mirov avtora i chitatelya. M.: Genezis, 2006.
5. Bunge M. Intuitsiya i nauka. M.: Progress, 1967.
6. Druzhinin V. N. Struktura i logika psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, 1994.
7. Kant I. Sobranie sochineniy v 8-i tt. M.: ChORO, 1994.
8. Kastaneda G.-N. Khudozhestvennyy vymysel i deystvitel'nost' // Logos, ¹ 3 (13), 1999.
9. Kibal'chenko I. A., Golubeva E. V. Psikhodiagnostika: Uchebnoe posobie s diagnostiko-kvalimetricheskim obespecheniem. Rostov n/D: Feniks, 2009.
10. Lessing G. E. Gamburgskaya dramaturgiya. M.: L.: Akademiya, 1936.
11. Leongard K. Aktsentuirovannye lichnosti. Rostov n/D: Feniks, 2000.
12. Lichko A. E. Psikhopatii i aktsentuatsii kharaktera u podrostkov. SPb.: Rech', 2010.
13. Miller B. Mozhet li vymyshlennyy personazh sushchestvovat' na samom dele? // Logos, ¹ 3, 1999.
14. Noss I. N. Vvedenie v tekhnologiyu psikhodiagnostiki. M.: Izd-vo Instituta psikhoterapii, 2003.
15. Polani M. Lichnostnoe znanie: Na puti k postkriticheskoy filosofii. M.: Progress, 1985.
16. Rudnev V. P. Kharaktery i rasstroystva lichnosti: Patografiya i metapsikhologiya. M.: Klass, 2002.
17. Simonov P. V., Ershov P. M. Temperament. Kharakter. Lichnost'. M.: Nauka, 1984.
18. Shapiro D. Nevroticheskie stili. M.: Institut obshchegumanitarnykh issledovaniy, 1998.
19. Shmid V. Narratologiya. 2-e izd. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, 2008.
20. Fenikhel' O. Psikhoanaliticheskaya teoriya nevrozov. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2004.
21. Goodman N. Fact, Fiction and Forecast. London: Athlone Press, 1954.
22. Stierle K. Für eine Öffnung des hermeneutischen Zirkels // Poetica. Zeitschrift für Sprach-und Literaturwissenschaft. 1985. Bd. 17.