Reference:
Shchekina E..
On certain peculiarities of the notion “circumvention of law” in the private international law of Germany
// International Law. – 2016. – № 3.
– P. 19-27.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2016.3.20503.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2016.3.20503
Read the article
Abstract: The subject of this article is the problem of the circumvention of law in the private international law of Germany. The author analyzes the positions of some contemporary German researchers pertaining to the question of circumvention of law and the criteria for its determination, as well as court decisions on this matter. The author raises a question on correlation between the circumvention of law and choice of law applicable to legal relation, as well as examines this problem in the context of the notion of autonomy of the parties. The separate groups of legal relations, for which according to the German judicial practice is characteristic the problem of circumvention of law, are being highlighted. The author’s main contribution into the development of the examined topic consists in the study of the position of certain German authors, who have not previously been covered in the Russian literature. During the course of this research, the author described the fundamental principles that serve as a guidelines for the German courts in dispute resolution with the presence of foreign component with regards to the question of circumvention of law.
Keywords: teleological interpretation, choice of law, Germany, party autonomie, circumvention of law, private international law, conflict of laws, family disputes, proper law, public order
References:
Ian Kropholler “Internationales Privatrrecht”, 6 Aufl.b Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck, 2001, str. 151-158
Reshenie BAG, Urteil vom 22. 10. 2015 – 2 AZR 720/14 (lexetius.com/2015,4664)
Reshenie BGH, 15.11.1976 – VIII ZR 76/75, DB 1977, 253
Milan Pak “Die Parteiautonomie in internationalen Kaufverträgen”, Haague, Springer Science + Business Media, 1967, str. 50-52
Reshenie DFR – BverfGE 31, 58 – Spanier Beschluss
Reshenie AG Düsseldorf 19.2.91-ß 266 F 172/90, IPRax 1991, 346
Reshenie 19 U 180/96 21.03.1997
Reshenie 11.11.1980 – 8 W 173/80, IPRspr 1980, Nr. 12 (S. 47);
Reshenie 18.12.1981 – 8W 215/81, IPRspr 1981, Nr. 12 (S.30)
Reshenie OLG Hamburg, 22.9.95-2U 29/94, NJW – RR 1996, 203
Reshenie BGH, 05.11.1980 – VIII ZR 230/79
Martina Benecke “Gesetzumgehung im Zivilrecht”, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2004, str. 232-264
Eugenia Kurzynsky-Singer “Das Verbot der Gesetzumgehung im deutschen Recht als ein potentielles legal transplant”, Max Planck Private Law Research Paper №