Reference:
Korchak, N.N..
Distinguishing the objects of economic
and competition law
// LEX RUSSICA (Russian Law). – 2014. – ¹ 4.
– P. 477-484.
Read the article
Abstract: The distinction between the objects of legal regulation of economic and competitive law has to do with
the contents of the terms “economic activity” and “economic competition”. The economic activity is a necessary
prerequisite for competition. At the same time competitive (adversarial) process may be a necessary condition
for the final economic result. Comparative analysis of the relevant norms of the Economic Code of Ukraine and
the norms of the Ukrainian legislation on economic competition provides the grounds for distinguishing the terms
“economic activity” and “economic competition” based on their sphere of application, form and goals of implementation.
Unlike the economic law, the term “economic subject” in competition law covers both entrepreneurs
and legal entities, as well as state and municipal bodies in the sphere of implementation of their economic activities,
as well as the group of economic subjects based on the element of control relations among them.
Keywords: legislation, law, economic, competitive, competition, market, adversarial, subject, control, activity.
References:
Bakal³ns'ka O.O. Zakhist ekonom³chno¿ konkurents³¿ : organ³zats³yno-pravov³ zasadi derzhavnogo upravl³nnya [Tekst]: dis. …kandidata yurid. nauk : 12.00.07 / Bakal³ns'ka Ol'ga Oleg³vna. − Ki¿v, 2003. – 210 s.
Bezukh O.V. Problemi pravovogo regulyuvannya ekonom³chno¿ konkurents³¿ v Ukra¿n³ [Tekst] / O.V. Bezukh. – K.: Naukovo-dosl³dniy ³nstitut privatnogo prava ³ p³dpriºmnitstva, 2008. – 192 s.
Voznyuk O. Konkurents³ya dlya protekts³on³zmu abo meta pravovogo regulyuvannya u sfer³ derzhavnikh zakup³vel' yak kriter³y viznachennya ob’ºkta pravovogo zakhistu ³ kval³f³kats³¿ porushennya [Tekst] / O. Voznyuk // Konkurents³ya. V³snik Antimonopol'nogo kom³tetu Ukra¿ni. – 2007. – ¹4 (27). – S.44-51.
Kerimov D.A. Metodologiya prava (predmet, funktsii, problemy filosofii prava) [Tekst] / D.A. Kerimov. – M.: Avanta +, 2001. – 560 s.
Kurbatov A.Ya. Sochetanie chastnykh i publichnykh interesov pri pravovom regulirovanii predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti [Tekst] / A.Ya. Kurbatov.− M.: AO «Tsentr Y
Reference:
Milchakova, O.V..
The principles of constitutional procedure in
the former Yugoslavia states
// LEX RUSSICA (Russian Law). – 2014. – ¹ 1.
– P. 98-108.
Read the article
Abstract: The article is devoted to the analysis of principles of procedure in the constitutional courts of the states
existing in the territory of former Yugoslavia (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia, Serbia, Slovenia, Croatia,
Montenegro). The author provides detailed discussion of the principles of accessibility of constitutional justice,
open character of constitutional procedure, equality and adversarial system, combination of dispositive and
inquisitional principles in the constitutional procedure. In the process of the study author provides theoretical
and normative legal basis for the statement that the principles of constitutional judicial procedure in the
former Yugoslavia states are mostly the traditional principles of justice, which are followed also in criminal,
administrative and civil judicial process, while the constitutional process itself has strongly inquisitional character.
Finally, the author draws a conclusion that some principles of constitutional judicial procedure in the
former Yugoslavia states are more democratic in their elements and implementation, than those in Russia.
Keywords: dispositive constitutional judicial process, inquisitive constitutional judicial process, accessibility of constitutional justice, constitutional justice, constitutional judicial process, former Yugoslavia states, constitutional court, constitutional procedure, actio popularis, Constitution
References:
Bondar' N. S. Sudebnyy konstitutsionalizm v Rossii v svete konstitutsionnogo pravo-sudiya. – M., 2011. – 544 s.
Vitruk N. V. Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie. Sudebno-konstitutsionnoe pravo i protsess: ucheb. posobie. – 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M., 2011. – 592 s.
Interv'yu s zamestitelem Predsedatelya Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF T. G. Morshchakovoy // Zakonodatel'stvo. – 1999. – ¹ 5. (Poslednee poseshchenie – 19 noyabrya 2013 g.)
Konstitutsionnyy kontrol' v zarubezhnykh stranakh: ucheb. posobie / otv. red. V. V. Makla-kov. – 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. – M., 2010. – 672 s.
Nesmeyanova S. E. Konstitutsionnyy sudebnyy protsess v Rossii: Ucheb. posobie. – M., 2012. – 204 s.
Nuriev G. Kh. Evropeyskaya model' konstitutsionnogo sudoproizvodstva. – M., 2012. – 224 s.
Raykova N. S. Sistema printsipov konstitutsionnogo sudoproizvodstva (na materialakh Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii). // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. – ¹ 326. – S. 107–110.
Shchuplenkov O.V.,
Reference:
Gruber, Joachim.
Provisions on cross default
of loan obligations
// LEX RUSSICA (Russian Law). – 2013. – ¹ 11.
– P. 1204-1211.
Read the article
Abstract: The so-called «cross default» of debt obligations is a standard provision on the preliminary termination
of an obligation, which is used in international loan agreements. Such provisions may be applied when
the debtor fails to perform his obligations to pay to the other party to the contract, thus causing doubts in his
reputation as a person capable of performing obligations towards other persons. The article includes analysis
of various types of provisions on cross default of loan obligations.
Keywords: jurisprudence, provisions on cross default of debt obligations, financial agreements, international credit agreements, international loan agreements, standard provisions for termination of contact, banking secret.
References:
1. Gruber Y. Polozheniya o perekrestnom neispolnenii dolgovykh obyazatel'stv v finansovykh
dogovorakh // Zhurnal dlya yuristov po voprosam mezhdunarodnogo biznesa, 1997.
Reference:
Korchak, N.N..
Doctrine of «behavior approach»
to guilt when establishing subjective
conditions for the responsibility
in the sphere of competition
// LEX RUSSICA (Russian Law). – 2013. – ¹ 11.
– P. 1212-1215.
Read the article
Abstract: Application of responsibility measures for the violations of competition legislation is closely connected
with establishing the guilt of the offender. The civilist doctrine provides for both psychological (subjective)
and behavior-related (objective) understanding of guilt. Taking into account the objective circumstances
provided for by the competition law, presumption of guilty behavior applies in this sphere. The
doctrine of behavior approach to understanding of law in the competition legislation may be described as
an algorithm (act — causality — result). The economic judicial practice proves the practical expediency of
application of the behavior approach to establishing the subjective elements for the application of responsibility
in cases of competition offences. Appearance or possibility of appearance of negative consequences
for the competition may show the negligent form of guilt, when a person could and should have taken
into account and prevented the negative consequences. Unlike the subjective understanding of guilt, the
doctrine of «behavior approach» establishes that guilt is a form of violation of the principles of good faith,
reasonability and justice in the sphere of competition by its participants, as well as violations of fair business
practices in economic sphere.
Keywords: jurisprudence, guilt, doctrine, offence, competition, legislation, violation, risk, causing, consequence, condition.
References:
Bakal³ns'ka O.O. Konkurentne pravo. — Kiev, 2019.
Eremenko V.I. Pravovoe regulirovanie konkurentnykh otnosheniy v Rossii i za rubezhom: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 2001.
Luk’yanets' D. Pravova priroda ³ osoblivost³ v³dpov³dal'nost³ za porushennya zakonodavstva pro zakhist ekonom³chno¿ konkurents³¿ // P³dpriºmnitstvo, gospodarstvo ³ pravo. — 2001. — ¹ 8.
Mel'nik S.B. Monopol'ne (dom³nuyuche) stanovishche sub’ºkta gospodaryuvannya na rinku: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Donets'k, 2001.
Novitskiy I.B., Lunts L.A. Obshchee uchenie ob obyazatel'stve. — M., 1950.
Parashchuk S.A. Konkurentnoe pravo (pravovoe regulirovanie konkurentsii i monopolii). — M., 2002.
Puginskiy B.I. Grazhdansko-pravovye sredstva v khozyaystvennykh otnosheniyakh. — M., 1984.
Sultonova T.I. Zloupotreblenie khozyaystvuyushchimi sub'ektami dominiruyushchim polozheni-em na rynke v Respublike Tadzhikistan: voprosy teorii i zakonodatel'stva: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Dushanbe, 2007.
Tot'ev K.Yu. Konkurentnoe
Reference:
Esakov, G.A..
Economic criminal law:
definition, contents,
and perspectives
// LEX RUSSICA (Russian Law). – 2013. – ¹ 9.
– P. 970-980.
Read the article
Abstract: The article is devoted to the problems of definition of economic criminal law as a sub-branch of
criminal law. Based upon the analysis of history and comparative legal data, as well as its contents, the
author proves that economic criminal law is a sub-branch of criminal, law, which is characterized by specific
type of contents, including crimes in the sphere of economics under the Special Part of the Criminal
Code of the Russian Federation and modification of generalized construction of elements of crime, attempted
crime, co-participation and matters excluding criminality of act in the light of economic reality
under the General Part of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The article is complemented by
practical conclusions regarding recognition of existence of economic criminal law. In the point of view of
the author economic criminal law inevitably presupposes specialization (deepening) of criminal law. The
problem of formal limits to casual criminal law (the rule of full (complete) codification of criminal law)
should also be resolved.
Keywords: jurisprudence, code, sub-branch, branch, crime, fault, subject, elements, mistake, res judicata.
References:
Handbuch Wirtschaftsstrafrecht / Achenbach/Ransiek (Hrsg.). 3 Auflage. 2012.
Pradel J. Droit pénal. T. 1: Introduction générale. Droit pénal general. Onzième édition. P., 1996.
Azarenok N. Konstitutsionno-pravovye osnovy preyuditsii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Ugolovnoe pravo. — 2012. — ¹ 4.
Bozh'ev V.P. Izderzhki sistemnogo kharaktera pri korrektirovke norm UPK o dokazyvanii i preyuditsii // Zakonnost'. — 2010. — ¹ 6.
Vasil'ev V.V. Podotrasl' grazhdanskogo prava: ponyatie i sushchnost' // Problemy prava. — 2012. — ¹ 4.
Volzhenkin B.V. Nekotorye voprosy differentsiatsii otvetstvennosti za pravonarushe-niya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti // Volzhenkin B.V. Izbrannye trudy po ugolov-nomu pravu i kriminologii (1963–2007 gg.). — SPb., 2008.
Volzhenkin B.V. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel'nosti po ugolovnomu pravu Rossii. — SPb., 2007.
Golovko L.V. Sootnoshenie ugolovnykh prestupleniy i administrativnykh pravonarushe-niy v konteks