Abstract: The article is devoted to the legal status of a juvenile person within the process of Implementation of justice and application of the measures of criminal legal Influence. Based on the studies of judicial practice, the author discusses the gaps in the guarantees of the rights of juveniles in the process of assigning a punishment, which in turn violates the principle of fairness, equality and individual character of criminal responsibility. The author discusses a number of problems, which appear in the practice of assigning punishment, when the conditions excluding their application for some age groups are present. The author provides grounds for the need to amend the legislation of Ukraine on criminal responsibility regarding property-related t punishments, taking into account the normative and judicial practice of the Russian Federation. The author discusses procedural bases for the protection of the rights of juvenile persons in the new Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine, characterizes them based upon certain stages of criminal process and offers optimum forms of introduction of foreign experience regarding training of personnel working with juvenile delinquents into the Ukrainian legal practice. The further reform of the judicial system regarding the underage persons in Ukraine and application of adequate criminal legal and educational measures to them shall allow to optimize the conditions for the formation of the socially acceptable behavior of the juvenile persons in the society.

Keywords: jurisprudence, juvenile, individualization of criminal responsibility, procedural protection, justice towards the juveniles, punishment, humanization of the measures of criminal law influence, justice, juvenology.

References:
Antipov V.V., Antipov V.?. Obstavini, yak? viklyuchayut' zastosuvannya krim?nal'nogo poka-rannya. — K., 2004.
Golovko L.V. Al'ternativy ugolovnomu presledovaniyu v sovremennom angliiskom prave // Pravovedenie. — 1998. — ¹ 3.
Krestovs'ka N.M. Yuvenal'ne pravo Ukra?ni: ?storiko-teoretichne dosl?dzhennya. — O., 2008.
Kuchinskii V.A. Pravovoi status i sub''ektivnye prava grazhdan // Pravovedenie. — 1965. — ¹ 4.
Prestuplenie i nakazanie v Anglii, SShA, Frantsii, FRG, Yaponii: Obshchaya chast' ugolovno-go prava / otv. red. N.F. Kuznetsova. — M., 1991.
Suchasne krim?nal'ne pravo Ukra?ni: normativno-pravov? dokumenti ta sudovo sl?dcha prak-tika: Khrestomat?ya / uporyadnik A.V. Savchenko ta ?n..; za zag. red. V.V. Kuznetsova. — K., 2005.
Yuzikova N.S. Teoriya i praktika naznacheniya nakazaniya nesovershennoletnim 14–16 let po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu Ukrainy // Ugolovnoe pravo: istoki, realii, perekhod k ustoichivomu razvitiyu: materialy V? Rossiiskogo kongressa ugolovnogo prava (26–27 m

Abstract: The main purpose of the cyber-security policy in a society is to protect the identity of nations and states, to form the real and efficient mechanisms for the guarantees of information rights and freedoms of persons in the cyberspace, to prevent the manipulation of mass conscience. The specific feature of the scientific position towards the cyber-security policy is that the ontological concept of cyber-security policy is the consequence of the paradigm understanding of the multi-vector development of the information society and the variety of it’s alternatives, it presupposes the inability to define the vectors of its developments in advance and clearly regulate the broad specter of information relations by law. From the epistemological point of view, the concept of the cyber-security policy helps to operationalize the interdisciplinary methodology to its formation and to apply it with the due addition of an adequate methodological instruments in order to develop an efficient mechanism of the cyber-security policy taking into account the modern tendencies of the new cyber-threats and the inter-disciplinary character of sciences. From the axiological point of view, the concept of cyber-security policy should be recognized as a value, which a document of such conceptual level possesses, in order to be legitimized. The modern world and the formation of the digital universe are not possible outside the context of the cyber-security policy.

Keywords: jurisprudence, legislation, cyber-security, cyber-threat, cyberspace, information, legal relations, politics, concept, optimization.

References:
Ar?stova ?.V. Derzhavna ?nformats?yna pol?tika: organ?zats?yno-pravov? aspekti. — Khark?v, 2000.
Akhlibinskiy B.V. Informatsiya i sistema. — L., 1969.
Bagrova I.Yu. Informatsionnaya politika: operativnost', tochnost', polnota // Bibliote-kar'. — 1990. — ¹ 10.
Bagrova I.Yu. Natsional'naya informatsionnaya politika: tseli, soderzhanie i mekhanizm realizatsii (analiticheskiy obzor) // Ros. gos. b-ka. Informkul'tura. — 1994. — Vyp. 2.
Baskakov V.Yu. Zakhist ?nformats?? z obmezhenim dostupom v umovakh borot'bi z organ?zovanoyu zlochinn?styu // Borot'ba z organ?zovanoyu zlochinn?styu ? korupts??yu (teor?ya ? praktika). — 2011.— ¹ 24.
Berestova T.F. Gosudarstvennaya informatsionnaya politika — instrument obespecheniya edinstva informatsionnogo prostranstva // Nauch. i tekhn. b-ki. — 2006. — ¹ 8.
B?lyakov K.?. «?nformats?yna» aks?omatika u prav?: problemi formuvannya // Naukoviy v?snik Yurid. akadem?? MVS Ukra?ni. — 2004. — ¹ 3.
B?lyakov K.?. ?nformats?yne pravo: anal?z term?nolog?chn