Рус Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Sociodynamics
Reference:

Patriotic education at the university: measuring the level of patriotism of students based on a sociological survey

Filippov Timur Dmitrievich

Graduate student; Faculty of History; M.K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University

677000, Russia, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), Yakutsk, ul. Belinsky, 58, office 505

tmf-22@mail.ru
Danilov Igor' Albertovich

ORCID: 0000-0002-1974-3088

Junior Researcher; Institute for Humanities Research and Indigenous Studies of the North of Siberian branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Office 310, Petrovskogo str., 1, Yakutsk, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), 677027, Russia

igor_danilov_2000@mail.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7144.2025.2.73208

EDN:

HHXYCC

Received:

31-01-2025


Published:

26-02-2025


Abstract: The article examines the patriotic education of university students on the example of the M.K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University. The aim of the work is to obtain up-to-date information about the level of patriotism among students as a result of the university's educational activities. The study is based on data from a sociological survey (N=1500) conducted in 2024. An adapted version of the "Methodology for Diagnostics and Criteria for Assessing the Effectiveness of Patriotic Education of Schoolchildren," developed by a team from the Institute of Humanitarian Research and Problems of Small-Numbered Peoples of the North, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, was used as a tool for measuring the level of patriotism among university students. The methodology is a sociological questionnaire aimed at self-diagnosis by educational institutions of the effectiveness of their patriotic education. In the course of this study, the questionnaire was modified to take into account the specifics of the student audience. The methodology includes analysis and interpretation of survey results, comparison of indicators of the level of patriotism and student involvement in patriotic activities. The novelty of the study lies in identifying the discrepancy between the level of patriotism and the involvement of students in relevant activities, and in analyzing the possible reasons for this phenomenon. The survey showed that the majority of students (71.9%) demonstrate a high level of patriotic feelings. At the same time, insufficient involvement of a significant part of students in patriotic activities was revealed: only 7.3% of respondents are characterized by high activity, 52.3% by medium activity, and 40.4% by low activity. It was established that the system of patriotic education in the studied university is effective in terms of forming patriotic feelings among students. At the same time, it is necessary to intensify efforts to involve students in practical activities of a patriotic orientation. The article proposes measures to solve this problem, including the development of student self-government, support for youth associations, implementation of military-patriotic events, regular monitoring and evaluation of work effectiveness. The data obtained can be used to optimize the system of patriotic education in the studied university, as well as in other universities with similar characteristics.


Keywords:

patriotism, patriotic education, patriotic activities, level of patriotism, involvement, formation of patriotic feelings, sociological survey, students, university, North-Eastern Federal University

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

The study was conducted under the project "Patriotism of the peoples of the North-East of Russia: a big and small homeland in the narratives of the inhabitants of Yakutia and Chukotka" within the framework of the Program of scientific research on the ethnocultural diversity of Russian society and aimed at strengthening Russian identity, 2023-2025. (Instruction of the President of the Russian Federation No. Pr-71 dated 01/16/2020). The head is Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences V.A. Tishkov.

Introduction

Patriotic education of young people is one of the priorities of state policy and the education system in Russia. Higher education institutions play a special role in the formation of patriotism, designed not only to provide professional knowledge, but also to train socially responsible citizens capable of active participation in the life of the country. At the same time, the effectiveness of patriotic education in universities largely depends on understanding the real patriotic attitudes of students, their attitude to the Motherland, and their willingness to serve its interests. Reliable information about the level and features of students' patriotism is necessary for building adequate educational work, using effective forms and methods of patriotic education.

The analysis of scientific articles demonstrates the relevance and importance of the problem of patriotic education of students in the modern system of higher education in Russia. Researchers from various universities representing pedagogical [1-2], technical [3-6], medical [7-8], marine [9-10], legal [11-13] and agricultural [14] fields emphasize the need for an integrated approach to the formation of patriotism and citizenship among students.

Researchers Rozhkova L.V. and Salnikova O.V. [15], based on the analysis of the results of sociological research, assess the state of patriotic values of students and the role of higher educational institutions in their development. The authors note that universities have formed an institutional system for the formation of youth patriotism, various patriotic activities are carried out, but the system for evaluating their effectiveness requires further improvement.

In this regard, an urgent scientific and practical task is to diagnose the patriotism of students. Quantitative measurement of the level of patriotic feelings of students, identification of factors of their formation will allow to give an objective picture of the state of patriotic education in universities and to outline ways of its improvement. Therefore, the purpose of this study is diagnostic in nature and is focused on obtaining up-to-date information about the level of patriotism of students as a result of the educational activities of the university.

Literature review

The issue of measuring the level of patriotism, especially among students, is a complex and multifaceted task. Thus, a number of authors emphasize the difference between declared and real patriotism. For example, Komlev V.A. et al. [16] in their study on the youth of the Kirov region, introduce the concept of "pragmatic patriotism", which manifests itself in the verbal expression of patriotic attitudes, but does not always correlate with real actions. The authors propose an approach that makes it possible to distinguish between these two types of patriotism, which, in their opinion, contributes to a more reliable assessment. The study analyzes the interrelationships between various components of patriotism, such as attitudes towards the Great Patriotic War, military service and migration.

At the same time, the researchers note that an important aspect of measuring patriotism is the definition of evaluation criteria. Skvortsov I.P. and Krapivka I.A. [17] distinguish cognitive, ideological-value, motivational-need, and activity-behavioral criteria. The authors believe that a comprehensive consideration of these criteria allows us to obtain a more complete picture of the level of patriotism formation and use them as targets in the process of military-patriotic education.

In the work of Barabanshchikova V.V. et al. [18], a theoretical model of the value orientation "patriotism" is presented, which includes 8 components, and a methodology for assessing the level of its formation is developed. The authors used a variety of methods, including an expert survey, focus groups, and a sociological survey. The application of the Kruskal-Wallis univariate analysis of variance has confirmed the validity of the developed methodology.

A statistical analysis of the relationship between the level of patriotism and various components, such as cognitive abilities, values, motivation and skills, was carried out in the study by T.E. Manger and Yu.V. Vasilyeva [19]. The authors used correlation and regression analysis, which revealed a high degree of closeness between the studied variables.

Teryaeva O.A. and Lomova O.A. [20] combine literature analysis, questionnaires and analysis of student essays to study a positive value attitude to patriotism, highlighting factors such as education, family upbringing and the socio-cultural environment.

Novgorodtseva T.Yu. and others [21] use various methods in their study of the level of patriotism formation among future teachers, including questionnaires, the method of color choices by M. Lusher and the method of assessing attitudes towards emotionally significant objects according to the method of S.A. Druzhilov. These methods allow us to assess the associative perception of patriotic values and determine the level of patriotism formation.

Thus, existing research suggests different approaches to measuring patriotism using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Special attention is paid to the development of comprehensive assessment models and criteria that take into account various components of patriotism.

Research methods and materials

Within the framework of this study, an adapted version of the "Diagnostic methodology and criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of patriotic education of schoolchildren", developed by the staff of the Institute for Humanitarian Studies and Problems of Indigenous Peoples of the North of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences [22], was used as a tool for measuring the level of patriotism of university students. It is a sociological questionnaire aimed at self-diagnosis by educational institutions of the effectiveness of their patriotic education. It is based on a system of criteria reflecting both the involvement of students in the process of patriotic education and the results of their patriotic consciousness development. In the course of this study, the questionnaire was modified to take into account the specifics of the student audience. The changes made concerned the adaptation of issues to the conditions of the university and the current social context. At the same time, the modified version retained the key conceptual foundations and structure of the original methodology.

The questionnaire includes 26 closed-ended questions to assess the cognitive, emotional, evaluative, and behavioral components of students' patriotism. Most of the questions assumed a dichotomous answer format ("yes"/ "no"), some – a choice of several options. The formulation of the questions, evaluation criteria, analysis procedure, and test results can be found in the article on the methodology itself [23].

The material for this article is the results of a sociological survey conducted in November 2024 at the Northeastern Federal University named after M.K. Ammosov, Yakutsk (hereinafter – NEFU). The general population consists of full–time students (about 15 thousand people). A quota sample was used, taking into account the proportional representation of faculties and courses. The sample size was 2,500 respondents, which ensured its representativeness. The survey was conducted online using Google Forms.

The results of the study

Northeastern Federal University pays considerable attention to the patriotic education of students. This area is one of the priorities in the educational program implemented by the university for the period 2021-2025, approved on 08/26/2021.

According to the program, the purpose of the patriotic module of educational work is "to develop a sense of indifference to the fate of the Fatherland, to its past, present and future in order to motivate students to realize and protect the interests of the Motherland." The patriotic module is closely connected with the civil law and spiritual and moral directions of the educational activity of the university. To implement these areas, the university uses various forms and methods of work: holding thematic events dedicated to memorable dates in the history of Russia, organizing meetings with veterans, representatives of law enforcement agencies, psychological trainings, business games, discussion platforms, etc.

An important role in patriotic education is played by the involvement of students in socially significant activities: volunteering, search movement, patronage of veterans, organization of charity events, etc. This is facilitated by the university's well-developed system of student self-government and the presence of a large number of youth associations of the appropriate profile. According to our survey, about 15% of students are members of patriotic and military-patriotic clubs. This indicator shows the significant potential of student associations in fostering patriotism. As part of the student government system, these clubs act as promoters of patriotic values among the youth. The members of the associations not only engage in socially significant activities themselves, but also involve their peers in it, and organize various actions and events.

The report on the implementation of patriotic activities at NEFU in 2023 testifies to the university's systematic approach to solving the tasks of patriotic education of students. As part of the patriotic module of the Educational Work Program in 2023, a set of 37 events of various formats was implemented: lectures, meetings, promotions, contests, etc. The total enrollment of participants exceeded 15,000 people, which is almost the entire contingent of full-time education.

A significant number of events implemented at NEFU in 2023 were timed to commemorate memorable dates in the history of Russia.: lifting the siege of Leningrad, victory in the Battle of Stalingrad, Victory Day. About 2 thousand students took part in them. This corresponds to the task of fostering respect for the heroic past of the country, reflected in the Work Program of Education. In addition, such large-scale actions as "Candle of Memory", "Immortal Regiment", "St. George Ribbon", not only contribute to the preservation of historical memory, but also provide an emotional experience for young people of the events of the war years, form a sense of belonging to the feat of the people.

In 2023, special attention was paid to activities aimed at countering the falsification of history and perpetuating the memory of the tragedy of the civilian population during the Great Patriotic War. Lectures on the topic of genocide, the project "Without a statute of limitations", "Dictation of Victory" and other similar events covered more than 6 thousand students. The mass nature of these events makes it possible to count on their high effectiveness in forming among young people a rejection of attempts to revise the results of the war, distort and belittle the feat of the Soviet people.

Thus, the effectiveness of these events in shaping students' patriotic feelings is confirmed in the results of the survey: 91.28% of respondents noted that the feat of the multinational people of the Soviet Union in the Great Patriotic War arouses patriotic feelings in them. Such a high indicator indicates that the memory of the Victory in the Great Patriotic War is a powerful factor in the patriotic education of young people. Thus, it can be argued that events dedicated to memorable dates of military history are an effective tool for updating this memory and forming an emotional bond between generations.

In addition, an important place in the NEFU calendar of events in 2023 was occupied by events related to students gaining experience in military-patriotic activities: Karbyshev training camps, interaction with law enforcement agencies, sports competitions, etc. More than 1,200 people took part in them. Of course, the involvement of students in such activities contributes to the formation of their readiness to defend their homeland, develops the necessary competencies and personal qualities. It should also be noted that the Military Training Center, established by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 3551-r dated December 11, 2021, plays an important role in the system of military-patriotic education at NEFU. The University provides full-time education to students in military training programs. Currently, more than 200 university students are studying there.

It is noteworthy that the vast majority of the students we interviewed (69.12%) associate the concept of patriotism with the willingness of men to serve in the army. This allows us to assert that the military-patriotic activities implemented at the university find a response in the minds of students, correspond to their ideas about patriotic duty. By gaining experience in military sports activities, students not only acquire practical skills, but also strengthen their willingness to serve the Fatherland. Participation in such events contributes to the formation of a positive image of the army, increases the prestige of military service among young people. In this context, the coverage of military-patriotic actions (more than 1,200 people) can be considered as an effective result of the educational work of the university.

Discussion of the research results

In general, NEFU's experience in the field of patriotic education of students can be considered successful, as evidenced by the results of a sociological survey (see Table 1). Thus, the high level of formation of patriotic feelings demonstrated by the majority of respondents (71.9%) is a natural result of the university's comprehensive work in this area.

Table 1 – Distribution of respondents by level of patriotism and involvement in patriotic activities, in numbers

The level of formation of patriotic feelings

Involvement in patriotic activities

Low

Average

High

The overall result

Low

139

42

2

183

Average

307

203

10

520

Tall

564

1063

170

1797

The overall result

1010

1308

182

2500

At the same time, 20.8% of students have an average level of patriotic feelings, while 7.3% have a low level. These data indicate the need for further improvement of patriotic education at the university, the search for new forms and methods of work that can reach and involve more students.

One of the important aspects of patriotic education is the involvement of students in relevant activities. However, the survey results show that only 52.3% of students demonstrate average involvement in the patriotic activities of the university, 40.4% – low involvement, and only 7.3% – high involvement. These data indicate the need to step up efforts to attract students to participate in patriotic events and projects.

A comparison of data on the level of formation of patriotic feelings and the level of involvement in patriotic activities allows us to draw an interesting conclusion. Firstly, among students with a high level of patriotic feelings, the majority (1,063 out of 1,797) demonstrate only average involvement in patriotic activities. Secondly, special attention should be paid to the fact that among students with low involvement in the patriotic activities of the university, more than half (564 out of 1010) demonstrate a high level of patriotic feelings. This result may have several explanations.

The first explanation is that the formation of patriotism among students occurs not only under the influence of events held by the university, but also by other institutions – the family, the media, public organizations, etc. Students who do not actively participate in the patriotic activities of the university can be involved in relevant work outside of it, and gain the necessary knowledge and experience from other sources.

The second explanation is related to the possible lack of effectiveness of the university's events, their inability to maintain the interest and activity of students. The proposed forms of work may not fully meet the needs and interests of students, and may be perceived by them as formal and mandatory.

The third explanation suggests that some students, having formed patriotic feelings, deliberately avoid participating in relevant events due to personal attitudes, preferences or circumstances.

In addition, the presence among the respondents of students with a high level of involvement in patriotic activities with a low level of formation of patriotic feelings (2 people) may indicate the formal nature of some events, insufficient emotional involvement of students. This fact sets the university the task of improving the quality of patriotic education, searching for new, more effective forms of work that can not only involve students in events, but also have a real impact on their values and beliefs.

Conclusion

The conducted sociological research made it possible to evaluate the effectiveness of the NEFU students' patriotic education system and identify a number of important aspects that require further development. The data obtained indicate a fairly high level of formation of patriotic feelings among the majority of respondents, which confirms the success of the programs and activities implemented at the university.

However, despite the positive dynamics, the analysis of students' involvement in patriotic activities revealed the need to improve the existing system. The level of active participation of students in patriotic events remains average, which indicates the lack of effectiveness of the forms and methods of work used in this area.

To ensure the effectiveness of the university's patriotic education activities, it is necessary to introduce a system of regular monitoring and evaluation of the work carried out. This will make it possible to identify problems in a timely manner, analyze the results achieved and make the necessary adjustments to the system of patriotic education. Further improvement of this system at the university will contribute to the formation of students' stable citizenship, active lifestyle and willingness to contribute to the development of their country.

References
1. Ktitorov, S. N., Pelikh, A. L., Khlopkova, V. M., & Shneider, V. G. (2023). Research on the formation of spiritual values, patriotism, and citizenship among students and teachers at a pedagogical university. Perspectives of Science and Education, 3(63), 27-49.
2. Martynenko, A. V., & Nadykin, T. D. (2023). Patriotic values in the sociocultural environment of student youth. Humanities and Education, 14(3), 77-81.
3. Gridina, V. V., & Ryazantsev, I. P. (2021). Patriotic attitudes of students at a technical university (based on the example of Samara). Medicine. Sociology. Philosophy. Applied Research, 5, 55-58.
4. Yuryeva, E. N. (2022). Problems of legal training in fostering civil responsibility and patriotism among students of technical universities. World of Science: Pedagogy and Psychology, 10(5), 1-11.
5. Ismailova, L. M., & Khabusieva, T. B. (2023). Features of patriotic education for students of Grozny State Oil Technical University named after Academician M.D. Millionshchikov. World of University Science: Culture, Education, 10, 98-105.
6. Moshchenok, G. B., & Startchkova, I. Yu. (2024). On the issue of civic-patriotic education of students at technical universities. Global Scientific Potential, 7(160), 34-36.
7. Makusheva, Zh. N. (2020). Modern aspects of patriotic education for students in medical universities: Based on research conducted in medical universities of the Russian Federation. Current Issues of Science and Education, 5, 32.
8. Andreeva, I. V., Bagryantsev, V. N., & Pai, S. S. (2023). Patriotic education of students in medical universities. Modern Science: Actual Problems of Theory and Practice, Humanities, 8-1, 44-48.
9. Mamedova, L. F. (2023). Formation of professional patriotism among cadets of a maritime university as a priority task of educational and upbringing activities. Bulletin of the State Maritime University named after Admiral F.F. Ushakov, 4(45), 163-166.
10. Tomilin, A. N., Tomilina, S. N., & Tukhtarov, R. R. (2024). Essential foundations for the formation of patriotism among cadets of a maritime university in the process of conventional training. World of Science, Culture, Education, 5(108), 131-134.
11. Kosinskiy, T. V., & Chernousov, A. A. (2022). The problem of patriotic education for youth in educational institutions of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. Legal Science: History and Modernity, 11, 152-156.
12. Kipreev, S. N. (2022). Formation of patriotism among cadets of educational organizations of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia in the course of everyday activities. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2(94), 191-198.
13. Zavyalov, A. N. (2024). State-patriotic education as an element of the education system at the Irkutsk Law Institute (branch) of the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation. Art of Jurisprudence, 2(10), 14-17.
14. Shutkova, S. A., & Ilyasova, Z. Z. (2023). Civic-patriotic education in an agrarian university (based on the example of Bashkir State Agrarian University). Russian Electronic Scientific Journal, 2(48), 547-555.
15. Rozhkova, L. V., & Salnikova, O. V. (2023). The role of higher educational institutions in the development of patriotic values among youth in modern conditions. Humanities of Southern Russia, 12(1), 109-123.
16. Komlev, V. A., Baliberdin, Yu. A., Smirnov, M. A., & Morzunov, A. P. (2023). Assessment of the level of pragmatic patriotism among youth in Kirov region. Bulletin of Nizhny Novgorod University named after N.I. Lobachevsky. Series: Social Sciences, 1(69), 155-164.
17. Skvortsov, I. P., & Krapivka, I. A. (2023). Criteria for assessing patriotism in research practice and the process of military-patriotic education. Humanitarian Problems of Military Affairs, 3(36), 23-30.
18. Barabanshikova, V. V., Ivanova, S. A., Arefyeva, N. A., et al. (2023). Value orientation "patriotism": Essence, content, and assessment of its formation. National Psychological Journal, 18(4), 99-112.
19. Manger, T. E., & Vasilieva, Yu. V. (2021). Statistical analysis of the dependence of the level of formation of patriotic feelings in adolescents on structural components. Bulletin of Tambov University. Series: Humanities, 26(191), 97-106.
20. Teriaeva, O. A., & Lomova, O. A. (2024). Research on the positive-value attitude of university students towards patriotism. Perspectives of Science and Education, 1(67), 70-93.
21. Novgorodtseva, T. Yu., Burdukowskaya, A. V., Ivanova, E. N., et al. (2024). Assessment of the level of formation of patriotism among future educators. Modern Pedagogical Education, 8, 176-181.
22. Vasilieva, O. V., Maklashova, E. G., Zakharova, A. E., Tomaska, A. G., Argylov, N. A., & Danilov, I. A. (2023). Methodology for diagnosing and criteria for assessing the effectiveness of patriotic education for schoolchildren: Brochure. (Unpublished).
23. Vasilieva, O. V., Maklashova, E. G., Tomaska, A. G., & Argylov, N. A. (2024). On the methodology for assessing the effectiveness of patriotic education. Bulletin of the Russian Nation, 2(95), 64-78.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the research in the presented article is patriotic education at the university through measuring the level of patriotism of students based on a sociological survey. As the methodology of the subject area of research in this article, within the framework of a systematic approach, the descriptive method, the analysis method, and the questionnaire method were used, and, as noted in the article, an "adapted version" of the Diagnostic Methodology and criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of patriotic education of schoolchildren was used to develop a questionnaire modified to focus on university students."". The survey was conducted online using Google Forms. The relevance of the article is beyond doubt, since education presupposes in its essence two inseparable processes, namely, education and training. In modern conditions of educational organizations' implementation of the educational process, issues of patriotism are given great importance. In this context, the study of patriotic education at the university through measuring the level of patriotism of students based on a sociological survey is of scientific interest in the community of scientists. In addition, the article notes that "the study was conducted on the project "Patriotism of the peoples of the North-East of Russia: a big and small homeland in the narratives of the inhabitants of Yakutia and Chukotka" as part of the Program of scientific research on the ethnocultural diversity of Russian society and aimed at strengthening Russian identity, 2023-2025. (Order of the President of the Russian Federation No. Pr-71 dated 16.01.2020)". The scientific novelty of the research consists in conducting a sociological survey using the author's methodology aimed at measuring the level of patriotism of students and studying the specifics of organizing patriotic education in an educational organization of higher education using the example of the Northeastern Federal University named after M.K. Ammosov (Yakutsk). The article is written in the language of a scientific style using in the text of the study the presentation of various positions of scientists on the problem under study and the application of scientific terminology and definitions characterizing the subject of the study, as well as a demonstration of the research results. Unfortunately, the structure of the article cannot be fully considered consistent, taking into account the basic requirements for writing scientific articles. The structure of this study contains elements such as an introduction, research methods and materials, the main part, conclusion and bibliography. The content of the article reflects its structure. In particular, the trends identified in the course of the study and noted are of particular value, which are characterized by the fact that "the purpose of the patriotic module of educational work is to "develop a sense of caring for the fate of the Fatherland, its past, present and future in order to motivate students to realize and protect the interests of the Motherland." The patriotic module is closely connected with the civil law and spiritual and moral directions of the educational activity of the university. To implement these areas, the university uses various forms and methods of work: holding thematic events dedicated to memorable dates in the history of Russia, organizing meetings with veterans, representatives of law enforcement agencies, psychological trainings, business games, discussion platforms, etc. An important role in patriotic education is played by the involvement of students in socially significant activities: volunteering, search movement, patronage of veterans, organization of charity events, etc. This is facilitated by the university's well-developed student government system and the presence of a large number of youth associations of the appropriate profile." The bibliography contains 18 sources, including Russian periodicals and non-periodicals. The article describes various positions and points of view of scientists, characterizing various aspects and features of the organization and implementation of patriotic education in universities. The article contains an appeal to various scientific works and sources devoted to this topic, which is included in the circle of scientific interests of researchers dealing with this issue. The presented study contains conclusions concerning the subject area of the study. In particular, it is noted that "the high level of formation of patriotic feelings among the majority of respondents indicates the success of the work carried out. At the same time, data on the involvement of students in patriotic activities indicate the need to find new forms and methods of work that can increase the activity of students. Promising areas in this regard are the development of student self-government, support for youth associations, as well as the implementation of military-patriotic activities. It is also important to ensure regular monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness of the work carried out, which will allow timely identification of problems and making necessary adjustments. Further improvement of the system of patriotic education at the university will contribute to the formation of a stable civic position among students." The materials of this study are intended for a wide range of readership, they can be interesting and used by scientists for scientific purposes, teachers in the educational process, management and employees of educational institutions of higher education, specialists of various organizations for youth work, employees of state executive authorities responsible for the education and upbringing of youth, sociologists, consultants, analysts, and experts. As the disadvantages of this study, it should be noted that it is necessary to pay special attention to the structure and disclosure of the content of some structural elements of the presented article. In particular, the article should have a separate title and describe more fully the section "Literature review" or "Theoretical review". It would be advisable to designate the sections "Research results" and "Discussion of research results" in the article. Based on the results of the conducted research, it would be necessary to draw more detailed conclusions, and not limit ourselves to a brief conclusion. Perhaps it would be advisable to include in the manuscript practical recommendations aimed at improving the system of organizing patriotic education at the university. When designing the table, it is necessary to pay attention to the requirements of the current GOST, to arrange it in accordance with these requirements. To make the results of the study more clear, figures could also be used, rather than just one table. In addition, the text of the article uses the abbreviated name of the educational organization on the basis of which the research was conducted, but the text does not mention the use of abbreviations, it would be necessary to write the full name, and then indicate in parentheses "(hereinafter – NEFU)". Given the relevance of the stated topic of the article, the presented volume of the manuscript does not allow for a full and comprehensive disclosure of the designated research topic. These shortcomings do not reduce the undoubted relevance, high degree of scientific and practical significance of the research itself, carried out under the "project "Patriotism of the peoples of the North-East of Russia: the big and small motherland in the narratives of the inhabitants of Yakutia and Chukotka "as part of the implementation of the Program of scientific research on the ethnocultural diversity of Russian society and aimed at strengthening Russian identity, 2023-2025," however, they must be promptly eliminated and the text of the article finalized. It is recommended to send the manuscript for revision.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The article discusses the topic of youth (student) patriotism, its formation/lack of formation and activity manifestation, which is very important for the present. The work carried out within the framework of the Presidential order complies with all the standards of the scientific article. It substantiates the relevance of the research, provides an overview of the literature related to the topic under development, using domestic sources from the last three years, describes the main research methods, identifies a sample of the studied groups, and provides the conclusions of the work presented in the narrative and in the form of a table. Surely this work will be published, especially since it was carried out under the supervision of Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences V.A. Tishkov. Nevertheless, it is impossible not to express a number of considerations related to the impressions of such materials. The authors use the Google forms questionnaire method and do not present the questionnaire they have developed to the reader. Based on many years of experience in such work, it has been proven that correspondence surveys reflect a certain "ideal" form of student youth's ideas about patriotism, which only partially corresponds to reality and often does not correlate with the activity component. For example, at one of the conferences, the results of the diagnosis of patriotism of students of the Southern Federal University were presented. The survey showed that 90% of SFU students consider themselves patriots, while 52% of them would like to leave Russia after graduation. The authors confirm some of the "good" conclusions of the article about the formation of patriotism among students with university Programs and educational work plans and digital indicators. Of course, this work can look great on paper. However, it is possible and necessary to test its effectiveness in other ways. For this purpose, statistics of offenses at the university are used; statistics of the number of students who returned to work in their specialty in their small homeland after graduation; statistics of students watching patriotic programs on TV; results of participation and victories in patriotic song or poster contests; statistics of the real number of volunteers and their volunteers, etc. It is clear that the authors did not set I have such a task in front of me. They limited themselves to conducting a survey. Maybe that's why their conclusions are hard to believe, and the recommendations proposed at the end of the article are unaddressed. To whom is the message addressed to delegate greater responsibility to student organizations "in organizing and conducting patriotic events"? To the vice-rector for educational work of the university? Who should provide "financial and organizational support to student clubs and societies engaged in military-patriotic education, local history, and the study of Russian history and culture"? Isn't this work being done at the university? Aren't funds allocated for its implementation? All this is present in every educational institution to one degree or another. Such materials do not bring new knowledge, they are unlikely to be quoted, except as an example of an article written within the framework of the existing canon.

Third Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the peer-reviewed study is the patriotic education of students at the university. The relevance of the topic chosen for the study cannot be overestimated: students, on the one hand, are the key to the future development of the country, but on the other hand, they often have very high protest and emigration sentiments. Accordingly, one cannot but agree with the author of the reviewed article in the high importance of "giving an objective picture of the state of patriotic education in universities and outlining ways to improve it." The research methodology is quite well thought out by the author and includes a questionnaire method based on a representative stratified sample of 2,500 respondents. It should be noted at once the completeness of the arguments of the methodological choice, up to a detailed description of the research methodology. The validity of the methodology and the reliability of the research results are also confirmed by reference to the methodological developments of scientists from the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. There is no doubt about the scientific novelty of these results: - testing of a methodology for diagnosing the effectiveness of patriotic education of schoolchildren, adapted to the study of the student target group; - evaluation of the effectiveness of patriotic education of students conducted at Northeastern Federal University based on this methodology; - identification of some of the problems of this education. Structurally, the reviewed work also makes a positive impression: its logic is consistent and reflects the main aspects of the research. Although some of the sections raise questions. The author of the reviewed article clearly tried to reproduce the standard of the structure of IMRAD scientific articles accepted in world science, highlighting the following sections: - "Introduction", where a scientific problem is posed, its relevance is substantiated, and the purpose and objectives of the study are formulated; - "Literature review", where the main approaches to solving the tasks are sufficiently detailed; - "Methods and research materials", where methodological reflection is conducted and the methodological choice is argued.; - "Research results", which partially reveals the results obtained; - "Discussion of research results", which not only discusses the results, but also part of the content of the previous section ("Results") for some reason turned out to be here too; - "Conclusion", which summarizes the results of the study, draws conclusions and outlines prospects further research. The style of the reviewed article is scientific and analytical. The text contains some (vanishingly small!) the number of stylistic and grammatical errors (for example, not very successful expressions like "diagnosis of patriotism" (not "values of patriotism"!), which causes negative connotations like "diagnosis of disease"; moreover, more correct terms are used in the text below, for example, "diagnosis of the effectiveness of patriotic education"; etc.), but In general, it is written quite competently, in very good Russian, with the correct use of scientific terminology. The bibliography includes 23 titles and adequately reflects the state of research on the subject of the article. Although it could be enhanced by using sources in foreign languages. An appeal to opponents takes place when analyzing the main approaches to solving a given scientific problem and arguing for a theoretical and methodological choice. The specially discussed advantages of the article include a fairly well-thought-out research methodology, as well as extensive empirical material collected for analysis. The importance of qualitative empirical research for the development of "normal science" should be noted separately (T. Kuhn). THE GENERAL CONCLUSION is that the article proposed for review, despite some minor design errors, can be qualified as a scientific work that meets the basic requirements for such work. The results obtained by the author will be interesting for political scientists, sociologists, specialists in organizing work with youth, university rectorates, as well as for students of the listed specialties. The presented material corresponds to the topic of the journal Sociodynamics. Based on the results of the review, the article is recommended for publication.