Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International relations
Reference:

Cambodia and ASEAN cooperation on investment

Ousaphea Yuok

PhD in History

Postgraduate student, Department of Theory and History of International Relations, RUDN University

117198, Russia, Moscow, Miklukho-Maklaya str., 6

yuokphea2015@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0641.2024.3.71253

EDN:

ZOPYYC

Received:

14-07-2024


Published:

22-07-2024


Abstract: The relevance of the article is due to the growing political and economic influence of ASEAN, and of Cambodia as an integral part of ASEAN, on the world arena. The tension between the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China has resulted in an acceleration of the building of a sovereign association of South-East Asian States. One of the key instruments for building this sovereign association is investment policy and foreign direct investment. The object of this study is cooperation between Cambodia and other ASEAN countries. The subject of this study is the Cambodia and ASEAN cooperation in foreign direct investment. The main purpose of the study is to consider the Cambodia and ASEAN cooperation in FDI and identify key issues in Cambodia’s investment policy within ASEAN. According to this purpose, there are the following goals: to study foreign direct investment in the context of neoliberalism; to analyze investment policy of Cambodia; to estimate ASEAN investment climate; to investigate Cambodia and ASEAN investment cooperation. The scientific novelty of the study is due to the discovery of a significant imbalance in investment flows between Cambodia and other ASEAN countries, consisting in the predominance of inward investment over outward investment. Moreover, the author gave practical advice on improving the investment climate of Cambodia within ASEAN countries.


Keywords:

Cambodia, ASEAN, FDI, Investment, Cooperation, CDC, USA, PRC, Japan, Hong Kong

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

Introduction

The relevance of the research topic is due to the growing political and economic influence of ASEAN on the world stage, of which Cambodia is an integral part, demonstrating significant economic and political growth. In addition, the increased tensions between the United States of America and the People's Republic of China should be taken into account, which affects both their relations with ASEAN and the situation within ASEAN. This tension led to the acceleration of the creation of the sovereign Association of Southeast Asian Nations. One of the key instruments for the creation of this sovereign association is investment policy and foreign direct investment.

The object of the study is Cambodia's cooperation with other ASEAN countries.

The subject of the study is the cooperation between Cambodia and ASEAN in the field of investment.

The main purpose of the study is to identify the key problems of Cambodia's investment policy within the framework of ASEAN.

To achieve this goal, the author had the following tasks: to study foreign direct investment in the context of the theory of neoliberalism; to study Cambodia's investment policy; to assess the investment climate of ASEAN; to analyze investment cooperation between Cambodia and ASEAN.

This work is based on the theory of neoliberalism in international relations. The key theorist of neoliberal institutionalism is the American political scientist and author of the term "soft power" Joseph Nye. The paradigm of neoliberalism considers the system of international relations as a non-anarchic system with the primacy of international law and trade, limiting the potential of armed conflict.

In the course of this research, the author used the following methods: content analysis, institutional, historical and statistical methods.

The scientific novelty of this study is based on the discovery of an imbalance in investment flows between the Kingdom of Cambodia and other ASEAN countries, consisting in the predominance of incoming investment flows over outgoing ones. Moreover, the author gives practical advice on improving Cambodia's investment climate in relation to ASEAN countries: The Kingdom of Cambodia needs to continue attracting FDI from both ASEAN member countries and outside the Association, but priority should be given to the ASEAN member States. In parallel with the growth of Cambodia's economy, the state needs to reduce the imbalance in investment flows by increasing outbound investments, primarily in the economies of ASEAN member countries. Moreover, the author found that Cambodia's investment regulations are aimed at attracting significant flows of incoming investments, rather than increasing outgoing investment flows to the economies of other countries.

Foreign direct investment (FDI) as part of the theory of neoliberalism

Since the end of the Cold War, the role of foreign direct investment (FDI) has grown significantly. According to Joseph Nye, a key theorist of neoliberalism and the author of the term "soft power", after the end of the Cold War and the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the military power of states became less utilitarian, since its use entails significant risks and losses. J. Nye notes: "Factors of technology, education and economic growth are becoming increasingly important in the context of international power, at the same time geography, population and raw materials are becoming less significant." According to J. In fact, one of the key factors mentioned earlier was foreign direct investment, the use of which can be directed at various actors: "Money is interchangeable in the sense that it is easy to convert it from one currency to another. Power has always been less interchangeable than money, but at the moment it is even less interchangeable than before... international investments create new interests and complicate coalitions in world politics." With regard to developing countries, J. Nye writes the following: "From a traditional point of view, states are the only significant actors in world politics, and only some large states play a significant role. However, at the moment other actors are becoming more and more important" [1].

Moreover, American political scientist Robert Keohane notes that in the post-Cold War era, the role of non-state actors, including multinational companies, has increased. Keohane proposed the concept of neoliberal institutionalism, which evaluates the role of non-state actors in the politics of countries, which in turn can lead to strengthening interstate cooperation and reducing the chance of a potential military conflict [2].

Thus, after the end of the Cold War, the role of financial capital increased against the background of a decrease in the importance of the traditional power of States. Key theorists of neoliberalism point out that, using financial capital, states build relationships based on mutually beneficial principles, which is also applicable to developing countries.

In order to confirm the role of financial capital and foreign direct investment in the context of the theory of neoliberalism, the author refers to the material of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). In the IMF article "Foreign Direct Investment in developing countries", the authors note that the flow of foreign direct investment in the period 1980-1997 increased by an average of 13% annually. Moreover, they note that the share of developing countries in the flow of incoming investments increased in the previously designated time period from 26% to 37%, and outgoing investments from developing countries increased from 3% to 14% [3]. In addition, the World Bank also confirms the increase in the flow of FDI, noting that the global volume of FDI in 1991 amounted to 221 billion US dollars, and in 2000 – 1.4 trillion US dollars [4].

Based on the previously presented data, it can be concluded that after the end of the Cold War, the influence of developing countries on the world stage increased, and the role of financial capital in developing countries became more significant, which fully corresponds to the theory of neoliberalism.

text-align:center;text-indent:35.45pt;line-height:150%'>Cambodia's Investment Policy

After the parliamentary elections in Cambodia in 1993, which were won by the National United Front for an Independent, Neutral, Peaceful Cambodia – FUNCINPEC, the "National Program for the Reconstruction and Rehabilitation of Cambodia" was adopted. This program was aimed at attracting foreign investment in key sectors of the Cambodian economy. According to D.V. Mosyakov, a leading Russian expert on Southeast Asia, in the period 1993-2005 Cambodia was able to attract about 5 billion US dollars of investments from the United States and Japan [5].

After the admission of Brunei (1984), Vietnam (1995), Laos and Myanmar (1997) to ASEAN, Cambodia became a full member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in 1999 [6].

Since Cambodia's accession to ASEAN, the country's economy has been showing significant growth rates. According to the World Bank, Cambodia's GDP grew from 3.44 billion US dollars to 10.35 billion US dollars in the period 1995-2008. It is worth noting that the global financial crisis of 2008 affected Cambodia's economy to a lesser extent, as can be seen from the country's gross domestic product in 2010, which amounted to 11.24 billion US dollars [7].

As reported in the World Bank's World Bank in Cambodia report: "Cambodia's economy grew by an average of 7.6 percent between 1995 and 2019, mainly due to tourism, manufacturing, real estate and construction, making it one of the fastest growing economies in the world"[8].

Having identified the key sectors of the Cambodian economy that bring a significant part of revenues to the state budget, foreign direct investment should be considered, the role of which in the Cambodian economy should not be underestimated. The Open Development Cambodia Agency notes that foreign direct investment has played a key role in the country's economic growth and poverty reduction, and the agency also reports that a sharp increase in FDI inflows into the Cambodian economy began after Cambodia joined the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2004 [9]. The agency's data is confirmed by the World Bank, which notes that in 2003 Cambodia was able to attract about 81.58 million US dollars of foreign direct investment, which corresponded to 1.8% of the country's GDP [10], at the same time, the flow of incoming FDI into the Cambodian economy in 2019 amounted to 3.66 billion US dollars (an increase of 44 times), which is equivalent to 13.5% of Cambodia's GDP [11].

As for Cambodia's investment policy, it is worth noting that, according to UNCTAD, the first law regulating the country's investment flows was adopted in 1994. The main provisions of this law are:

1. The main provisions;

2. Cambodia Development Council;

3. Investment Procedures;

4. Investment guarantees;

5. Investment incentives;

6. Ownership and use of land;

7. Labor practices;

8. Disputes and termination;

9. Final provisions [12].

The next step in creating a legal framework for Cambodia's investment policy was the adoption in 2003 of the Investment Law, which specified many of the main provisions of the 1994 law. Such clarifications include the systematization of dispute settlement, protection from nationalization of property, etc.

In parallel with the development of the Investment Law of 2003, the Cambodia Development Council was established in 2002, whose main task was to "Encourage and facilitate foreign and local investment in order to achieve a healthy private sector in the development of Cambodia." To achieve the previously mentioned objective, the Cambodia Development Council has set itself the following goals:

1. Providing information to potential investors;

2. Consideration of investment applications and grant support;

mso-list:l13 level1 lfo16'>3. Monitoring of investment projects after their implementation;

4. Provision of support services to investors after the implementation of their projects;

5. Creation of a platform for private investors to participate in the political dialogue within the framework of the forum with the participation of government representatives, held twice a year [13].

The last investment law in Cambodia was passed in 2021. This law encourages investments in the Cambodian economy by improving the "climate" in which investors carry out their activities: the period for issuing certificates of registration of investors and their projects is reduced to 20 days, the activities of line ministries are audited, the safety of investors and their projects in Cambodia is ensured by observing international law [14]. The complexity of this law is indicated by the number of concretized concepts reflected in 12 parts of the NPA itself:

1. The main provisions;

2. Cambodia Development Council;

3. Investment mechanism at the municipal-provincial level;

4. Registration and implementation of investment projects;

5. Investment guarantees and protection;

6. Investment incentives;

7. Acquisition, sale or merger of an investment project;

8. Cancellation of the investment project;

9. Disputes and dispute resolution;

10. Realization;

11. Transitional provisions;

12. Final provisions.

The conducted content analysis of this law demonstrates which lexical units prevail in this NPA:

1. investments;

2. The law;

3. The project;

4. The article;

5. Cambodia Development Council;

6. Cambodia;

7. By-law;

8. Tax;

mso-add-space:auto;text-align:justify;text-indent:35.45pt;line-height:150%; mso-list:l3 level1 lfo6'>9. investor;

10. Qualified institutional placement;

12. Municipal-provincial;

26. Industrial;

41. employee;

63. technology, etc.

Based on the previously conducted content analysis, it can be concluded that a key aspect of this law is the attraction and regulation of foreign direct investment in Cambodia through the activities of the Cambodia Development Council. The greatest attention in this document is paid to the protection of investors, attracting investments to the municipalities of the country, etc.

It is also worth noting the key investors in the Cambodian economy:

1. The People's Republic of China;

2. The Republic of Korea;

3. The European Union;

4. Malaysia;

5. Vietnam;

6. United States of America;

7. Thailand;

8. Hong Kong;

9. Singapore [15].

Summing up all the above, it can be concluded that the active development of Cambodia's investment policy began in the 1990s after the transition to a market economy. The first law regulating the investment policy of the Kingdom of Cambodia was a 1994 document that laid the foundations for the state's investment policy. The next step in the development of the state's investment policy was the 2003 law, which largely complemented and specified the previous NPA. In 2004, Cambodia joined the WTO, which led to a sharp increase in FDI inflows into the country's economy. The latest investment law was adopted in 2021 after the end of the COVID-19 pandemic. Such a systematic policy to systematize the regulatory framework and attract FDI into the country's economy allowed the country's leadership to achieve an average annual GDP growth of 7.6%.

ASEAN Investment Climate

ASEAN member states are among the main recipients of foreign direct investment: in 2022, the total flow of incoming investments into the economies of ASEAN member countries amounted to 225 billion US dollars, but Cambodia is not a key recipient of foreign investment. The hierarchy of FDI recipients within ASEAN is as follows:

The hierarchy of FDI recipients within ASEAN

State

The volume of incoming FDI in billions of US dollars

text-align:center;line-height:150%'>Singapore

141.1

Indonesia

22.1

Vietnam

17.9

Malaysia

17

Thailand

11.2

Philippines

9.4

Cambodia

3.6

Myanmar

2.9

Laos

0.635

Brunei

-0.284

justify;text-indent:35.45pt;line-height:150%'>Source: [16]

It is important to understand that the key investors in the economies of ASEAN member countries are the United States (40.2 billion US dollars - 22.5%), China (18.7 billion US dollars – 7%), Japan (27 billion US dollars), Hong Kong (13 billion US dollars), the Republic of Korea (13 billion US dollars) [17][18].

The United States and China compete for foreign direct investment in ASEAN due to a number of factors, the most significant of which is the rapid growth of the Association's population (the population of ASEAN in 1967 was 259.5 million people, and in 2023 – 686.8 million people), which clearly affects the number of workers in the member states of the Association [19]. The opportunity to use the labor of such a large number of workers can affect the position of both the United States and China in the international arena [20].

The key industries in which the United States, China, Japan, etc. invest their own investments are finance and insurance, wholesale and retail trade, manufacturing, real estate, transport, warehousing, mining and quarrying, electric power, agriculture, fishing, etc.

However, it is important to understand that different countries invest in different ASEAN member states: The United States invests more in Singapore's economy, while Japan invests in the economies of Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia and Myanmar [21].

Summing up all the above, we can conclude that ASEAN is the most attractive destination for foreign direct investment due to the rapid population growth. The key investors in the economies of the ASEAN member countries are the United States, China, Japan, the Republic of Korea and Hong Kong. At the same time, the key recipients of FDI within ASEAN are Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam. The key industries in which developed countries invest are finance and insurance, wholesale and retail trade, manufacturing, real estate, transport, warehousing, mining and quarrying, electric power, agriculture, fishing, etc.

Cambodia-ASEAN investment cooperation

Cambodia-ASEAN investment cooperation is based on incoming and outgoing investment flows:

Outgoing investments. The Kingdom of Cambodia invests about 150 million US dollars (at the time of 2022), which is 23 times less than the volume of incoming investments [22]. The key recipients of Cambodia's investments are the Netherlands, the USA, Germany, Sweden, Estonia and Greece [23]. As it is easy to see, the Kingdom of Cambodia invests its own financial capital in states with significant industrial potential or developed port infrastructure. At the same time, it is worth noting that outgoing investments in the economies of the ASEAN member states are insignificant.

Incoming investments. According to one of the leading information agencies, FDI Intelligence, the Kingdom of Cambodia is one of the key recipients of FDI, bypassing countries such as Iraq, Kenya, Namibia, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Morocco, India, etc. [24]. The main investors in the Cambodian economy were discussed earlier in this article.

Key investors in Cambodia's economy within the framework of ASEAN are Thailand, Singapore and Malaysia [25]. Each of the previously designated states invests in various sectors of the Cambodian economy: Thailand – food, tobacco, construction; Singapore – textiles, clothing, shoes; Malaysia – wood, paper, printing [26].

One of the key ways to attract FDI into the Cambodian economy are special economic zones – SEZs. Since 2005, Cambodia has had about 54 SEZs, but by 2022 their number has decreased to 22. The creation of special economic zones was aimed at accelerating the country's economic growth by attracting foreign investment [27].

List of special economic zones of Cambodia

mso-border-alt:solid windowtext .5pt;padding:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt'>

N/A

Special Economic Zone

Number of registered foreign companies

Tai Seng Bavet

11

Manhattan

18

Goldfame Pak Shun

3

Kampot

N/A

Phnom Penh

100

Poi Pet O'Neang

1

Neang Kok Koh Kong

2

Stung Hav

N/A

Sihanoukville

2

Sihanoukville 1

18

Sihanoukville Port

1

Hi-Park

Shandong Sunshell Svay Rieng

N/A

Sanco Cambo

N/A

Dragon King Bavet

N/A

Sovannaphum

N/A

Svay Rieng GIGA Resource

N/A

Poipet PP

N/A

Intervia Automobile Industry Complex

N/A

Cambodian Zhejiang Guoji

N/A

Kerry Worldbridge

N/A

Qi Lu Jian Pu Jay

N/A

Source: [28]

Based on the information provided earlier, more than 140 different international companies operate on the territory of the SEZ in Cambodia. The largest registered companies are Phnom Penh, Sihanoukville, Manhattan and Tai Seng Bavet SEZ. It is worth noting that such a clear popularity of these SEZs among investors is due to favorable business conditions, even in comparison with SEZs of other countries within ASEAN, for example, the Philippines: the cost of establishing a company in the SEZ of Cambodia is 16,135 US dollars against 21,850 US dollars in the Philippines, annual costs – 2,300 US dollars against 134,500 US dollars, issued joint stock The capital is $1,000 against $200,000. Moreover, companies registered on the territory of the SEZ in Cambodia are not taxed, while in the Philippines companies are required to pay taxes in the amount of 5% of profits [29].

An equally important factor in attracting FDI to the Cambodian economy is its rapid growth: according to the World Bank, the growth of the Cambodian economy in terms of gross domestic product (5.4% in 2023) was higher than the global average and outstripped the economic development of other ASEAN member states [30]. Moreover, Cambodia is the leader among ASEAN member states in terms of employment in industrial production: about 79.5% of the country's total working-age population is employed in industry, which is higher than the global average of 66% [31].

Based on the information provided earlier, it can be concluded that there is a clear imbalance in the investment relations between Cambodia and other ASEAN countries, expressed in the predominance of incoming investment flows into the Cambodian economy over outgoing ones. On the one hand, a significant flow of incoming FDI has led to the rapid growth of the Cambodian economy and the solution of the country's key economic problems, which include low labor productivity and small nominal GDP. Moreover, within the framework of ASEAN, the member States of the Association invest heavily in the country's industry, which clearly contributes to the development of the Cambodian economy and the reduction of unemployment. However, on the other hand, due to the continuing low nominal GDP, Cambodia is unable at this stage of economic development to invest significant amounts in the economies of ASEAN member countries, investing only in the economies of Western countries, which leads to capital outflow outside ASEAN.

At this stage of economic development, Cambodia needs to further attract FDI from ASEAN member States as a matter of priority for the purpose of mutual and sovereign development, which clearly corresponds to the goals of the Association [32]. Moreover, Cambodia needs to reorient incoming FDI into more knowledge-intensive industries, which include education and microelectronics.

Conclusion

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations has demonstrated significant success in the field of economic, political and social development, being the most successful integration association in Asia. One of the reasons for such rapid growth is the policy of non-interference in the internal affairs of other states and the openness of the economy, which attracted significant foreign investment. The key investors in the economies of the ASEAN member countries are the United States, China, Japan, the Republic of Korea and Hong Kong. At the same time, the key recipients of FDI within ASEAN are Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam. The key industries in which developed countries invest are finance and insurance, wholesale and retail trade, manufacturing, real estate, transport, warehousing, mining and quarrying, electric power, agriculture, fishing, etc.

The openness of Cambodia's economy and peaceful foreign policy allowed the Kingdom of Cambodia to attract significant foreign investment into the country's economy at the turn of the millennium, making Cambodia one of the fastest growing developing countries. However, in parallel with the development of ASEAN and the growth of its role in the international arena, the imbalance in investment relations between Cambodia and other ASEAN member States also grew. At this stage of economic development, Cambodia needs to further attract FDI from ASEAN member States as a matter of priority for the purpose of mutual and sovereign development, which clearly corresponds to the goals of the Association. Moreover, Cambodia needs to reorient incoming FDI into more knowledge-intensive industries, which include education and microelectronics.

References
1. Nye, J.S. (1990). Soft Power. Foreign Policy, 80, 153–171.
2. Keohane, R.O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Mallampally, P., & Sauvant, K.P. (1999). Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries. Finance & Development, 36(1), 34–43.
4. Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$). URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BM.KLT.DINV.CD.WD?end=2022&skipRedirection=true&start=1970&view=chart (accessed: 01.07.2024)
5. Mosyakov, D.V. (2010). The History of Cambodia XX Century. Moscow: Institute of Oriental Studies of RAS.
6. ASEAN member states. URL: https://asean.org/member-states (accessed: 25.05.2024)
7. GDP (current US$) – Cambodia. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=KH (accessed: 25.05.2024)
8. The World Bank In Cambodia. URL: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/cambodia/overview#:~:text=In%202020%2C%20the%20economy%20contracted,reached%205.4%20percent%20in%202023 (accessed: 25.05.2024)
9. Investment policy and regulations. URL: https://opendevelopmentcambodia.net/topics/investment-policy-and-regulation/ (accessed: 25.05.2024)
10. Foreign direct investment, net inflows (BoP, current US$) – Cambodia. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.CD.WD?locations=KH (accessed: 25.05.2024)
11. Foreign direct investment, net inflows (% of GDP) – Cambodia. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS?locations=KH (accessed: 25.05.2024)
12. Law on investment of the Kingdom of Cambodia. URL: https://ibccambodia.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Law_on_investment_English.pdf (accessed: 25.05.2024)
13. Who we are. URL: https://cdc.gov.kh/who-we-are/ (accessed: 25.05.2024)
14. Cambodia’s new investment law becomes more attractive and considerate for investors. URL: https://www.khmertimeskh.com/50891114/cambodias-new-investment-law-becomes-more-attractive-and-considerate-for-investors/?__cf_chl_rt_tk=JSuYNSAbC8fwyL7kMyONTYw0GSU8CainA6SQ4SoSY2c-1717089219-0.0.1.1-4138 (accessed: 25.05.2024)
15. O’Neill, D. (2014). Playing Risk: Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in Cambodia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 36(2), 173–205.
16. Flows of Inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) to ASEAN Countries (in million US$). URL: https://data.aseanstats.org/indicator/FDI.AMS.TOT.INF (accessed: 28.05.2024)
17. ASEAN FDI Hits All-Time High as EV Investment Skyrockets. URL: https://jakartaglobe.id/business/asean-fdi-hits-alltime-high-as-ev-investment-skyrockets (accessed: 28.05.2024)
18. Fine-tuning FDI screening can propel Singapore and ASEAN forward. URL: https://eastasiaforum.org/2024/01/26/fine-tuning-fdi-screening-can-propel-singapore-and-asean-forward/ (accessed: 28.05.2024)
19. South-Eastern Asia Population. URL: https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/south-eastern-asia-population/ (accessed: 28.05.2024)
20. Chia-yi, Lee. (2019). Foreign Direct Investment in ASEAN and its Policy Challenges. Financial cooperation in East Asia, 36–44.
21. Kikuchi, T., & Sayaka, U. (2019). Japan’s investment in Southeast Asia. Japanese infrastructure investment in Southeast Asia, 10–14.
22. Foreign direct investment, net outflows (BoP, current US$) – Cambodia. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BM.KLT.DINV.CD.WD?locations=KH (accessed: 29.05.2024)
23. FDI statistics by partner country and by industry – Summary. URL: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=FDI_CTRY_IND_SUMM (accessed: 29.05.2024)
24. Cambodia carries the strongest FDI momentum into 2024. URL: https://www.fdiintelligence.com/content/locations/global/cambodia-carries-the-strongest-fdi-momentum-into-2024-83236 (accessed: 29.05.2024)
25. Stocks of Outward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) at year-end, by destination country (in million US$). URL: https://data.aseanstats.org/fdi-by-hosts-and-sources-stock-outward (accessed: 30.05.2024)
26. Dalis, P. (2013). The Role of Foreign Direct Investment in Cambodia’s Industrial Development. Cambodia Development Review, 17(2), 5–8.
27. Rogozhin, A.A. (2020). Special Economic Zones in Southeast Asia. South East Asia: Actual problems of Development, 1(46), 69–78.
28. Special economic zones. URL: https://opendevelopmentcambodia.net/profiles/special-economic-zones/ (accessed: 02.07.2024)
29. Asia tax exempt free zone companies in 2024. URL: https://www.healyconsultants.com/asia-pacific-incorporation/asia-tax-exempt-free-zone-companies/ (accessed: 02.07.2024)
30. GDP growth (annual %) - Cambodia, Thailand, Indonesia, Myanmar, Singapore, World, Viet Nam, Philippines, Lao PDR, Brunei Darussalam. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?end=2023&locations=KH-TH-ID-MM-SG-1W-VN-PH-LA-BN&skipRedirection=true&start=2023&view=bar (accessed: 02.07.2024)
31. Labor force participation rate, total (% of total population ages 15-64) (modeled ILO estimate) - Cambodia, Thailand, Indonesia, Myanmar, Viet Nam, Malaysia, Philippines, Lao PDR, Brunei Darussalam, World. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.ACTI.ZS?end=2022&locations=KH-TH-ID-MM-VN-MY-PH-LA-BN-1W&skipRedirection=true&start=2022&view=bar (accessed: 02.07.2024)
32. Chalk, P. (2015). The institutional development of ASEAN. Australian Strategic Policy Institute, 9–12.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the peer-reviewed study is the forms and processes of cooperation between the Kingdom of Cambodia and ASEAN countries in the field of investment. The author rightly connects the high degree of relevance of the chosen topic with the growing political and economic influence of ASEAN in modern international relations. An additional argument is also the increase in the level of tension between the United States and China, which has a significant impact on the situation within ASEAN. Accordingly, the purpose of the study is to study the cooperation between Cambodia and ASEAN in the field of foreign direct investment. Of course, studying something cannot be the goal of scientific research – it is not a pedagogical activity. The goal may be to achieve some kind of scientific result, that is, what the author states in the terms "by which [achieving the set goal – rec.] it becomes possible to identify the key problems of Cambodia's investment policy within the framework of ASEAN." In other words, it is precisely the identification of problems (or forms, institutions, etc.) that can be the purpose of research, but not the "study of something". The author does not quite correctly reveal the theoretical and methodological basis of his own research, stating that he was based on the "theory of neoliberalism", the key theorist of which is Joseph Nye. The problem here is that the concept of neoliberalism is an umbrella for many scientific concepts related not only to the theory of international relations, but also to ideologies, economic processes, and many others. Without specifying which specific area this concept belongs to, it creates ambiguities. However, we must pay tribute to the author: below he pays enough attention to the disclosure of the term "neoliberalism in international relations" (or "neoliberal institutionalism") in order to properly specify the theoretical basis on which the methods used in the research process were based. However, there are also questions about the methodology. Among the methods used, the author calls content analysis (indeed, traces of the use of this method can be found when analyzing the content of the laws of Cambodia regulating the country's investment flows), "analysis" (which one?! the mention of "analysis" after "content analysis" means "clarification" by a more general term of a more specific one like "I ate scrambled eggs and food at breakfast"), "problematic chronological" (it is unclear to what - to which objects - this "method" was applied and what its specific essence is). At the same time, what was really used in the research process (based on the context), but not mentioned by the author: the institutional method (when studying the specific institutional environment in which investment flows occur in Cambodia; content analysis was applied to the content of laws, but their forms and specifics were investigated by the institutional method), historical (when considering the institutional dynamics of investment processes in Cambodia), statistical (when studying statistical data that express investment processes in Cambodia), etc. The correct application of these methods allowed the author to obtain results with signs of scientific novelty. The author himself, as his contribution to science, declares the identification of an imbalance in investment flows between the Kingdom of Cambodia and other ASEAN countries, as well as practical recommendations formulated by him to improve the investment climate in Cambodia. To this, we can add the specifics of the institutional design identified in the course of the study (through content analysis), which formalizes investment processes in Cambodia, directly focused on attracting investments, rather than increasing outbound investments in the economies of ASEAN countries. Structurally, the work also does not cause significant complaints: its logic is quite consistent and reflects the main aspects of the research. The following sections are highlighted in the text: - "Introduction", which reveals the relevance of the research topic, describes its object and subject, sets goals and objectives, and declares, but does not argue the theoretical and methodological basis; - some of the arguments in favor of applying the neoliberal theory of international relations can be found in the next section "Foreign direct investment (FDI) as part of the theory of neoliberalism"; - the actual investment policies of the Kingdom of Cambodia, as well as the ASEAN countries with which it interacts, are disclosed in the following two sections "Investment Policy of Cambodia" and "ASEAN Investment Climate", and the specifics and forms of their cooperation – in the section entitled "Cooperation between Cambodia and ASEAN in investment areas"; - finally, the "Conclusion" summarizes the main results of the study, draws conclusions and outlines prospects for further research. The style of the reviewed work is generally scientific, although it contains some oddities that forced the reviewer to recommend the article for revision. First of all, we are talking about the unjustified practice of the author in the context of the article to cite the English-language original when quoting with subsequent translation into Russian, which leaves the impression of the work as a draft version, and not a finished article. Russian Russian translation In scientific journalism, it is indeed sometimes possible to find quoting the original with subsequent translation, but only in cases where this practice is justified – for example, when the author does not agree with an existing translation into Russian of a scientific work and provides his own version of the translation; or when the term (or a fragment of the text) in Russian does not reflect the specifics of the term in the original language (for example, the clarification "policy" after the Russian-language term "policy"). In all other cases, quotations in the original language are not provided. Why the author does this (for example, when quoting the works of Joseph Nye) of a peer-reviewed article remains a mystery. Why to quote the wording of the laws of Cambodia (and even in English, and not in Khmer) is also unclear. What ambiguity can be seen in the term "investment guarantees" that it was necessary to cite the English version of "Investment guarantees"? Even more strange is the "clarification" of the very clear Russian-language term "tax" by the English-language "tax", given the ambiguity of the English language in general, and this word in particular! Such inexplicable practice leaves a feeling of redundancy and sloppiness of the text, significantly reducing its scientific style. In all other aspects, there are no significant complaints about the text: in general, it is written quite competently, in good Russian, with the correct use of scientific terminology. The bibliography includes 32 titles, including sources in foreign languages, and adequately reflects the state of research on the subject of the article. An appeal to the opponents can be found in the section "Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) as part of the theory of neoliberalism". GENERAL CONCLUSION: the article proposed for review can be qualified as a scientific work that meets the basic requirements for works of this kind. The results obtained by the author have signs of scientific novelty and reliability and will be of interest to the community of political scientists, sociologists, economists, specialists in the field of world politics and international relations, as well as students of the listed specialties. The presented material corresponds to the subject of the journal "International Relations". Based on the results of the review, the article can be recommended for publication after the elimination of the key remark concerning the duplication of the text in English and Russian.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

"The West is the West, the East is the East, they will never meet." These lines by R. Kipling are very often cited to emphasize the differences between the two macrocivilizations. But there are significant differences within the same civilizational East: For example, China has been characterized by social mobility for almost its entire history, which cannot be said about caste India. As for Southeast Asia, this region is still little studied in our country, despite its increasing weight in world politics and economics. These circumstances determine the relevance of the article submitted for review, the subject of which is cooperation between Cambodia and ASEAN in the field of investment. The author aims to study foreign direct investment in the context of the theory of neoliberalism, to consider Cambodia's investment policy, to assess the investment climate of ASEAN, to analyze investment cooperation between Cambodia and ASEAN. The work is based on the principles of analysis and synthesis, reliability, objectivity, the methodological basis of the research is a systematic approach, which is based on the consideration of the object as an integral complex of interrelated elements. The author also uses a comparative method. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the very formulation of the topic: the author, based on various sources, seeks to give practical advice on improving Cambodia's investment climate in relation to ASEAN countries. Considering the bibliographic list of the article, its scale and versatility should be noted as a positive point: in total, the list of references includes over 30 different sources and studies. The undoubted advantage of the reviewed article is the involvement of foreign English-language literature, which is determined by the very formulation of the topic. Among the sources attracted by the author, in addition to the periodical press, we note the materials of the World Bank. Among the studies used, we will point to the works of D.V. Mosyakov and A.A. Rogozhin, whose focus is on various aspects of studying the countries of Southeast Asia. Note that the bibliography is important both from a scientific and educational point of view: after reading the text, readers can turn to other materials on its topic. In general, in our opinion, the integrated use of various sources and research contributed to the solution of the tasks facing the author. The style of writing the article can be attributed to a scientific one, at the same time understandable not only to specialists, but also to a wide readership, to anyone interested in both Southeast Asia in general and Cambodia in particular. The appeal to the opponents is presented at the level of the collected information received by the author during the work on the topic of the article. The structure of the work is characterized by a certain logic and consistency, it can be distinguished by an introduction, the main part, and conclusion. It attracts a significant amount of statistical data in its work. At the beginning, the author defines the relevance of the topic, shows that "the active development of Cambodia's investment policy began in the 1990s after the transition to a market economy." Considering ASEAN, the author emphasizes that one of the reasons for its rapid growth "is the policy of non-interference in the internal affairs of other states and the openness of the economy, which attracted significant foreign investment." The paper shows that "the openness of Cambodia's economy and a peaceful foreign policy course allowed the Kingdom of Cambodia to attract significant foreign investment into the country's economy at the turn of the millennium, making Cambodia one of the fastest growing developing countries." The main conclusion of the article is that "at this stage of economic development, Cambodia needs to further attract FDI from ASEAN member States as a matter of priority for the purpose of mutual and sovereign development, which clearly corresponds to the goals of creating the Association, while "Cambodia needs to reorient incoming FDI into more knowledge-intensive industries, which include education and microelectronics". The article submitted for review is devoted to an urgent topic, will arouse readers' interest, is provided with 2 tables, and its materials can be used both in training courses and within the framework of cooperation strategies with ASEAN. In general, in our opinion, the article can be recommended for publication in the journal "International Relations".