Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Urban Studies
Reference:

Consulates of different countries in Harbin in the first third of the 20th century

Smolianinova Tatiana Anatolyevna

ORCID: 0000-0001-9328-5524

Senior Lecturer; Graduate School of Architecture and Urban Planning; Pacific State University

680035, Russia, Khabarovsk Territory, Khabarovsk, st. Pacific, 136, office 506b

design.total@yandex.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2310-8673.2024.3.71198

EDN:

ZCGWCU

Received:

05-07-2024


Published:

25-07-2024


Abstract: The subject of the article is the buildings of consular offices in Harbin (Northeast China). The object of the study is the consular offices and their urban planning in the city structure. The author examines and analyzes consular offices of different countries that opened their offices during the late nineteenth and first half of the twentieth century. In the course of the study, the position of the objects was analyzed and their characteristic features of location were revealed. The study is aimed at identifying the facilities where consulates of different countries were located and analyzing the criteria for choosing facilities for the placement of consulates in them. The boundaries of the study are determined by the period of the late XIX – mid XX century. The scientific novelty of the article is determined by the collection and systematization of materials from field surveys (2023), the systematization of historical and archival materials. The article examines the history of the emergence and development of consular institutions in the city of Harbin. Attention is paid to the reasons for the appearance of these institutions and the principles of their placement in the city. Attention is drawn to how the location of the consular buildings depended on urban development and their importance. The architectural appearance of some notable consular sites is also briefly analyzed. The research is based on empirical methods, including observation and examination. Thanks to the cartographic analysis, it was possible to determine the location of consular offices in urban areas. In addition, a genetic approach was applied, which helped to identify the features and connections of consular institutions in a historical context. The main conclusions of the study are that consular offices were important objects for the formation of the compositional structure of the city. The architecture of the consular buildings reflected the stylistics of different countries, filled the cities with stylistic flavor, and increased the level of landscaping of the territories adjacent to these buildings. The study of the principles of the development of consular institutions in the context of the European architectural heritage of that period is of great interest, especially given the growing interest in identifying and preserving Russian cultural heritage. Consular institutions, in addition to their administrative and political role, had cultural and historical value. Therefore, the analysis of these institutions in terms of their importance for the development of relations between states, as well as their architectural features, allows not only to assess their political, but also their architectural value.


Keywords:

consulate, architecture, history, urban planning regulations, territory, project, railway, master plan, dominant, engineers

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

Introduction. Harbin City was designed and built by Russian engineers during the construction of the Chinese-Eastern Railway (CER). Harbin's favorable geographical location, located at the intersection of waterways and railways, played a key role in its rapid development. The city has become an important administrative, commercial, industrial and political center. In a short time, two main districts were formed in the city: the New City, where the main administrative offices and employee houses are located, and the Marina, a commercial and industrial district. With the development of international relations, consulates and diplomatic missions of different countries appeared in the city. This indicates a high level of international activity in this area. The Russian contribution to the development of the city and its infrastructure had a significant impact on its formation. Thus, the results of the study can be practically significant in the context of preserving the architectural and historical heritage of Russian and foreign architecture in the territory of Northeast China [1].

N. P. Kradin [2-4] and S. S. Levoshko [5] became one of the first researchers of Harbin architecture in Russia. They examined the legacy of Russian and European architects in the cities of Manchuria, including Harbin. The works of N. E. Ablova [6], M. A. Vivdych [7], A. A. Lisitsyn [8] and T. Y. Troitskaya [9] are devoted to the history of the construction of the Chinese-Eastern Railway. It is also worth noting the works of M. E. Bazilevich [4, 14], in which the activities of some architects who worked in Manchuria, including Harbin, are considered in detail. Photographs from the 1980s and 1990s of the preserved and already lost buildings that formed the appearance of Harbin are presented in the works of Chinese researcher Zhang Huaisheng [11]. The books of the author's team of Chinese scientists [12, 13] contain brief historical descriptions of the objects and their photographs. Political and historical issues were also raised in the works of V. G. Datsyshen, V. V. Sushkov and E. M. Mironova [14, 15, 16].

The materials studied helped to systematize information about the buildings where the consular offices were located, as well as about the time of their operation and how and when the consulates appeared in Harbin. This process was influenced not only by political, but also by economic factors. Having studied the materials of the periodical press (the newspapers "Rupor" and "Zarya"), which were published in Harbin during the period under review, it was possible to establish the addresses of previously unidentified positions of consular facilities, as well as how they worked.

Opening of consular offices in Harbin. The appearance of foreign states in Manchuria led to the appearance of consulates and diplomatic missions in Harbin. The development of economic and political relations, especially in the context of the construction of the Russian Railway in China, contributed to their interaction. Thus, the diplomatic presence in Harbin has become an important part of the historical context. Harbin city has become a cultural center due to favorable conditions for the development and conduct of business activities. The influx of a diverse population led to the formation of various national diasporas, which brought part of their culture to the rapidly developing new city, which was reflected in the architectural and historical heritage. As evidenced by the reference books and newspapers published at that time ("All Harbin", "Mouthpiece", "Dawn"), according to which in the early 1920s Harbin was a multinational city with a rich social life. During this period, consular buildings appeared in the city, the preserved buildings of which can still be seen today in Harbin. The study found that there were 19 consulates general, consulates and representative offices of various countries in Russian Harbin, as well as two diplomatic bureaus and a Japanese military mission. The study found 30 consular facilities, including one unrealized consular complex project. Some of these objects have survived to the present day, while others can be studied from photographs and documents. On the Harbin plan of 1916 (Fig. 1a), six consulates were noted in the area of the New City: the Imperial Russian Consulate General, the French, Belgian, USA, the Imperial Japanese Consulate General, the British Consulate, as well as two diplomatic bureaus in the Marina area — the Jilin and Qiqihar, the court and the prison at the Jilin Bureau [17]. According to the well–known reference book "The Whole of Harbin" for 1926, 15 consulates were already operating in the city [18, pp.84-85]. In 1930, Innokenty Charov's handbook "Harbin Album" noted 14 consulates and representative offices of different states [19]. And in the Handbook of Northern Manchuria and the CER dated 1927, 17 consulates were listed, including the USSR, USA, Great Britain, France, Japan, Italy, Germany, Denmark, Poland, the Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden, Latvia, Portugal, Lithuania and Estonia [20, pp.566-568]. In 1933, 10 consular sites were marked on the map (Fig. 1b) [21]. Interestingly, in the directories, in addition to the addresses of consular buildings, the names of consuls general, vice-consuls and diplomatic representatives are indicated. Some of the identified consular sites have survived to the present day, the preserved historical evidence of consular activity gives uniqueness and helps to better understand the architectural heritage of Harbin.

a) b)

a — 1916; b — 1933

Figure 1. Harbin City Plan

Consular offices of different countries. The Russian consulate was especially actively developing. During the period of diplomatic relations with China, Russia has opened five consular offices. All of them were located in the area of the New City, in strategically important places near the administrative buildings of the road administration. Initially, due to the lack of their own buildings, consular offices actively rented premises for consular needs. The Consulate of the Russian Empire was no exception and rented the building of the Garrison Assembly (now the Yamato Hotel), located in the most presentable part of the city on Vokzalny Prospekt [22]. V. F. Luba was appointed Consul General [23, p. 266]. The consulate was temporarily located in this building until in 1909 it moved to a new building located on the corner of Pravlenskaya and Sadovaya streets in the same area. The building was erected in 1904. It was designed for the CER by Russian architects. The consulate was located there until 1920. Later it was transferred to the Russian-Chinese technical School, which two years later was transformed into a Polytechnic Institute [2, pp. 202-203]. The architecture of the object has features of Art Nouveau, which are more evident in the decor of the building and the characteristic outline of the window openings. The main focus is the entrance group, which is a combination of three openings framed by pilasters with a bend at the ground floor level. In 1953, the building was reconstructed according to the project of architect P. S. Sviridov. Currently, the building houses the museum of Harbin Polytechnic Institute (KHPI).

With the development of consular activity, the Russian Empire attempted to build a consular complex in Harbin. It was supposed to erect three consular buildings. The project was developed by a talented engineer Kazy-Giray in 1913 and 1914. However, unfortunately, due to the difficult political situation at that time, the project could not be implemented [24]. The sketch designs demonstrate the rich stucco decoration, which was mainly located in the upper part of the buildings, emphasizing the dynamic domes. Rustication and the use of round windows are also noticeable on the facades.

From 1924 to 1931, the USSR Consulate was located in the Kroll mansion on Girinskaya Street [20, 25]. Then (1932) the Consulate of the Czech Republic was located here, which was headed by Consul G. Horni. On the territory surrounded by a fence, office buildings made in the Art Nouveau style have been preserved. Now the mansion, although residential, is in a dilapidated state. The mansion has not lost its appeal, although it has been rebuilt and needs renovation. Recognizable decor can be seen on the facades, and authentic doors, stairs and forged fence elements have been preserved in the interior.

In 1925, an additional consulate office was opened at the corner of Boulevard Avenue and Strelkova Street. It is located in the building of the Central Union [26]. And already in 1927, the consulate moved to the Main Street, where it was located in the former mansion of General Horvath. Such a good location and a large area of the site made the Soviet consulate stand out among others. There were two buildings on the territory. A new two-storey building for consulate employees was located in the courtyard, surrounded by a fence. Employees of the consulate occupied apartments on the two upper floors, and on the ground floor there was a dining room, technical and office premises. And the mansion itself, in which the consul's family lived, had offices and reception rooms. The territory of the consulate was equipped with a sports field with projectiles, a volleyball court and a tennis court. After 1945, the Consulate General of the USSR continued to be located in this mansion. It was the only and last consulate in Harbin, which closed in 1962. Today, the buildings of the complex are in dilapidated condition and are not used.

Many of the buildings where the apartments and mansions of consuls and vice-consuls, secretaries and employees were located were owned by the Chinese Eastern Railway (CER). For example, Soviet consuls Menin and Orlov lived in houses belonging to the CER [27]. The Lithuanian Consulate is located in a house for railway employees at the corner of Customs Street and Fudutunsky Lane.

During its presence, the Japanese Consulate has changed several buildings. The first of them was located on the corner of Novotorgovaya and Sadovaya Streets and belonged to a large contractor of the Chinese-Eastern Railway, Wang ho-wen [28, p. 156], where the consulate was opened in 1907. The International Red Cross was also located here. The apartment building was demolished in 2001. Its architecture combined elements of rational Art Nouveau, which were not quite typical for that time. Architectural details such as dark vertical panels, a wide white belt around the perimeter of the third floor, a complexly profiled cornice with crackers and brackets, in which the color contrast is well read, are clearly visible in the preserved photographs.

Two other buildings, which housed consulates, have survived to the present day. This building is located on Vokzalny Prospekt, where the Consulate General was located from 1936 to 1945, and the consul's mansion on Novotorgovaya Street. Both buildings were designed by architect Y. P. Zhdanov. The Consulate General, located in the building of the Harbin branch of the Russian Railways on Vokzalny Prospekt, was made in the Baroque style with abundant decor. The asymmetry of the building, accentuated by risalites and hyperscale windows, emphasized its individuality in the construction of the street.

Another building along Tsitsikarskaya Street has not been preserved. It was a stone building on a high basement with a wide front staircase, built in 1907. It was used for the needs of the consulate until 1915. The architecture of the building had Neo-Renaissance features with elements of classicism.

The American Consulate was opened in 1907 on Novotorgovaya Street between Bolshoy Prospekt and Sadovaya Street. The head of the consulate was Reid Fischer [13, p. 53]. Unfortunately, the building has not been preserved to this day.

In 1910, the second residence of the American consulate was the Samsonovich apartment building, located on the corner of Bolshoy Prospekt and Azhiheiskaya Street. The consulate occupied an advantageous angular position. The style of rational Art Nouveau was traced in its architecture, and a dominant trapezoidal tent stood out in the corner part of the building.

In 1924, the U.S. Consulate was located in an apartment building located at 102 Bolshoy Prospekt, between Azhiheiskaya and Girinskaya Streets [29]. G. K. Henson became consul, and P. M. Dudko became Vice consul. As is customary, consuls and vice-consuls lived next to the consulate. Vice-Consul P. M. Dudko lived on Girinskaya Street, 27, in the Chi Shi-fu house.

Unlike other countries, Germany has placed its first consulates in the commercial and industrial area of the Marina. The first building of the German Consulate was opened in 1909 in a two-story brick apartment building on Artillery Street between Commercial and Police streets. The asymmetric construction of the ordinary blocked-up street was distinguished by contrasting decorative elements made of brick, painted white [30]. Daumiller was appointed consul, and later Heinze. The second building, which housed the consulate, was the building of a former apartment building on Commercial Street, this building has survived to the present day and is now used as an office [31]. A commemorative plaque is installed on its facade, which reads: "The building of the German Consulate in Harbin. It is built of brick." Based on the collected materials, it can be argued that these were the first consulates opened in the area.

Later, in 1920, the German Consulate was opened in the area of the New City, on Azhiheiskaya Street, between Bolshoy Prospekt and Sadovaya Street. The building in which the consulate was located was located opposite the Portuguese Consulate. Initially, this house belonged to the Popov brothers. Currently, the primary school library is located in this building.

In addition to the German consulate, consulates of other countries were located in the Marina area. For example, in 1911, the first French agency opened on Kavkazskaya Street. The Belgian Vice-Consulate has been located in the same building since 1913. The two-storey building, rectangular in plan, made in brick style, has not survived to the present day.

It was possible to identify other addresses where the consulates of Belgium were located, this is a building on the corner of Commercial and Novogorodnaya Streets, as well as on the corner of Diagonal and Artillery Streets, on the 3rd Line, Tsitsikarskaya and Birzhevaya Streets.

The first French consulate was opened in 1907 in the eastern part of Bolshoy Prospekt. From 1916 to 1947, the consulate was located on Hospital Street, in the former Skidelsky mansion. The Portuguese consulate also worked there. The building was built in 1914 by architect M. A. Troyanovsky for merchant L. N. Skidelsky. The asymmetrical facade is grouped by volumes of different heights, a triangular pediment rising above the Corinthian columns stands out on the left side of the facade, and a dome on the right. The building is well preserved and is included in the list of protected objects.

The British Consulate was opened in 1911, it was located at the intersection of Bolshoy Prospekt and Telinskaya Street. In the early 30s, the consulate moved to Vokzalnaya Street in a building specially built for consular needs. The consulate was built in 1930 according to a project created in 1919, in the strict manner of the Gregorian style characteristic of the early British period. This three-storey building has a rectangular shape. Its symmetrical plastered facade is decorated with columns of the Ionic order in two floors. The third floor of the building is separated by a strongly projecting cornice.

One of the most notable consular buildings that have survived to the present day was located in Nikolaevsky Lane, near the central square (former Cathedral Square). We are talking about the Gibello-Socco mansion, which was built in 1919 and became the consul of Italy in 1920. The Consulate occupied an angular position and faced the Cathedral Square with its main facade. There was a plot of land around the mansion, surrounded by an elegant concrete fence. The walls of the building are decorated with various bas-reliefs and stucco, and the sculptural compositions are mainly focused on the central volume, which give it a romantic look characteristic of the Renaissance. Despite the fact that the mansion is now surrounded by tall modern buildings, it has not lost its appeal.

The second preserved consulate building is located at the intersection of Sungariysky Prospekt and Engineering Street. It was built in 1924 of brick and concrete and is a one-story building. In addition to the consular building, additional office buildings were located on the site. The composition of the site is aimed at forming an area around which the consular buildings are concentrated. The architecture of the buildings has features of modernity. This can be seen in the outlines of window openings, plastic walls and simple, but very characteristic decor.

In 1926, the Italian Consulate was located on the corner of Girinskaya Street and Boulevard Avenue. Unfortunately, this building no longer exists. The consulate also served Romanian citizens [18]. It was an interesting small building in the style of historicism, which attracted attention with its multi-height volumes, completed with tall tents with spires. The use of brickwork and plastered elements gave the building a special expressiveness.

Numerous diasporas opened representative offices near their settlement areas. Unlike the major European powers, these diasporas were small and did not actively build new facilities.

In January 1916, the Danish Royal Consulate opened on Polevoy Street in the Marina area in Harbin, which operated until 1946. At that time, the consular functions were performed by the Consul of Russia Traushold, and then he was replaced by the Danish Consul Jacobson. The brick consulate building, built in an eclectic style with Art Nouveau elements, is still a significant architectural landmark of the street.

The Consulate of the Polish Republic was opened in 1920 in the building of the "Polish Pan" on a remote street. This building was home to the consulate until 1941. The building was an asymmetrical brick structure consisting of two volumes: the main three-storey and an attached one and a half floors. The extension ended with a wooden veranda, the entrance to which led through the third floor of the main volume. The horizontal linear division of the facades contrasted with the dynamics of the risalites, completed with curved attics, which gave the building an expressive silhouette.

Although the building of the Dutch Consulate has not survived to this day, it remains an interesting example of a building with exotic features in the development of the city. The contrast between the low and high volumes of the building was created by the tower and the pitched roof. Bright colors and a combination of different materials gave the building typical Dutch features.

During the research, it was not possible to find buildings that housed consulates and representative offices of some countries. For example, the Swedish Vice-consulate, opened in 1926 on Khorvatovsky Prospekt, or the Latvian Vice-Consulate on Belgian Street. The buildings where the representative office of the Republic of Lithuania was located on Customs and Commercial Streets, the representative office of the Republic of Estonia on Line 5, Boulevard Avenue and Girinskaya Street, the Austrian Consulate and the Georgian Consulate on Line 2 (Georgian Street) were also lost.

It is curious that the consulates not only fulfilled their direct duties, but also helped the represented citizens to adapt. For example, the Georgian consulate, located at the Georgian society, housed a sports club for young people [32] and taught Georgian language courses [33]. A school was opened at the Czechoslovak Consulate, for which Consul R. F. Geyna was responsible [34]. Thus, it can be said that the activities of consulates reflected not only on the formation of the image of Harbin, but also generally created favorable conditions for life in a territory far from the homeland.

Now the preserved buildings have different purposes. Some of them are owned by the Chinese government, others have retained residential functions, and others are used for commercial purposes. None of these buildings have retained their original consular functions, even those that were built specifically for them. Buildings located far from tourist routes are gradually losing their original attractiveness. The facades of buildings facing the main streets of the city are periodically restored, and the interior layout is significantly changed. Most of the yard areas are used for parking and have become part of the urban environment.

Conclusion. Analyzing the location of consular offices, it can be seen that most of them are located in the New Town area. This area was distinguished not only by its representative buildings, but also by a more developed infrastructure. Most consular offices are located along or near tram tracks. This speaks not only about their transport accessibility, but also about the importance of their visual perception. A well-chosen location for consulates has often become a decisive factor in political dominance. The choice of location was determined not only by its strategic position in the urban structure, but also by the degree of emotional impact.

Engineers paid special attention to the expressiveness of the buildings. To do this, they used towers, domes of various shapes and complexities, decorative tents topped with spires, so we can say that the accent completion of buildings was of great importance during this period. With the help of portals, risalites and bay windows, a complex plastic solution was created, which was emphasized by individual stylistic solutions of the objects. The active use of stucco decoration, sculptural compositions and ornaments gave the objects great expressiveness. If we analyze the consular buildings, we can see that there is a desire to emphasize national identity in their architecture. However, today, due to the active high-rise modern construction, the emphasis on these objects in urban development is lost.

During the study, it was possible to establish new addresses where consular offices were located, which indicates a broader development of international relations. The presence of consulates of Sweden, Latvia, Estonia, Austria and Georgia, which were mainly located in the places of national settlement of the respective diasporas, became especially noticeable. Although the buildings have not been preserved, they are of interest for a more thorough study. This study can help to discover these objects on historical panoramas of the city, which will allow for a better understanding of the architectural features of representative buildings in these countries.

References
1. Nilus, E. H. (Ed.). (1990). Historical overview of the Chinese Eastern Railway. 1896–1923. Harbin: China Printing House.
2. Kradin, N. P. (2001). Harbin – the Russian Atlantis. Khabarovsk: Khabarovsk Regional Printing House.
3. Kradin, N. P. (2010). Harbin – the Russian Atlantis. Khabarovsk: Khabarovsk Regional Printing House.
4. Kradin, N. P., & Bbazilevich, M. E. (2020). Architects and Engineers of the Far East. Creative Activity of Graduates of the Capital’'s Educational Institutions – in Transbaikalia, Yakutia, the Amur Region, Primorye and China. Khabarovsk: Khabarovsk Regional Printing House.
5. Levoshko, S. S. (2003). Russian Architecture in Manchuria. Late 19th – first half of the 20th century. Khabarovsk: Private collection.
6. Ablova, N. E. (2005). CER and the Russian Emigration in China: International and Political Aspects of History: First Half of the 20th Century. [Dr. Habil. dissertation. Institute of the Far East of the Russian Academy of Sciences].
7. Vivdych, M. A. (2011). Railway Construction in the Far East in the Late 19th – Early 20th Century. [Ph.D thesis. Institute of History of Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences].
8. Lisitsyn, A. A. (2011). Activities of railway engineers in the implementation of railway transport policy in the Far East of Russia. [Dr. Habil. dissertation. Far Eastern State University of Humanities].
9. Troitskaya, T. Yu. (1996). Specific Features of the Architecture of Chinese Eastern Railway: Late 19th – First Third of the 20th Century. [Ph. D dissertation. Novosibirsk State Academy of Architecture and Art].
10. Bazilevich, M. E. (2018). Activity and Contribution of Graduates of St. Petersburg Architectural and Engineering Schools to the Development of Architecture of the Far East: the Second Half of the 19th – Early 20th Centuries. [Ph.D dissertation. Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering].
11. Chang, H. (Ed.) (1990). Harbin Architecture. Harbin: Heilongjiang Science and Technology Press.
12. Gong, J., Li, W., & Zeng, Y. (Eds.) (2005). Harbin Architectural Art Museum. Harbin: Heilongjiang People's Publishing House.
13. Li, S. (Ed.). (2000). Old Photos of Harbin. Harbin: People’s Fine Arts Publishing House.
14. Datsyshen, V. G. (2016). Soviet-Japanese relations during the conflict on the Chinese Eastern Railway in 1929. Japanese Studies, 1, 6–19.
15. Sushkov, V. V. (2016). Formation of the consulates of the Russian Empire in China. In,Questions of history, international relations and document management: collection of materials of the XII International Scientific and Practical Conference of Students, Masters, Postgraduate Students and Young Scientists. Vol. 2. (pp. 120–125). Tomsk: Tomsk State University.
16. Mironova, E. M. (2013). Diplomacy of non-Bolshevik Russia. From Pevchesky Bridge to Grenelle Street. 1917–1918. Moscow: IVI RAS.
17. China Eastern Railway Society. (1916). Harbin city plan. Harbin: Lithography of the Technical Department of the CER Track Service.
18. Ternavsky, S. T. (1926). All of Harbin for 1926. Address and reference book. Harbin: Printing house of the Chinese Eastern Railway.
19. Charov, I. (1930). Album of Harbin. Harbin: s. n.
20Handbook on Northern Manchuria and the Chinese Eastern Railway. (1927). Harbin: s. n.
21. State Archive of Khabarovsk Territory. Fund Ð2076. Inventory 1. File 1.
22. Shipkov, G. N. (Ed). (1935, April 16). Zarya: Daily democratic newspaper. Harbin: M. S. Lembich.
23. State Organization Kio-wa-kai and the Main Bureau for Russian Emigrants in the Manchu Empire. (1942). Great Manchu Empire. For the tenth anniversary. Kharbin: Publication of the State Organization Kio-wa-kai and the Main Bureau for Russian Emigrants in the Manchu Empire.
24. Archive of foreign policy of the Russian empire. Fund 351. Inventory 911. File 76. Sheet 1–7.
25. Shipkov, G. N. (Ed). (1924, October 5). Zarya: Daily democratic newspaper. Harbin: M. S. Lembich.
26. Kaufman, E. S. (Ed.) (1926, September 16). Rupor: Daily Evening Democratic Newspaper. Harbin: Pamflet.
27. Shipkov, G. N. (Ed). (1934, November 10). Zarya: Daily democratic newspaper. Harbin: M. S. Lembich.
28. Clark, I. S. (1910). Address-calendar and Trade and Industrial Index of the Far East and Companion to Siberia, Manchuria, Amur and the Ussuri Territory. Vladivostok: “Vladivostok Printing Business” by G. F. Vetovetsky.
29. Shipkov, G. N. (Ed). (1924, October 31). Zarya: Daily democratic newspaper. Harbin: M. S. Lembich.
30. Ping, Z. (Ed.). (2014). Archival memories of Harbin (album) (1726-1949). Harbin: Heilongjiang People’s Publishing House.
31. Smolyaninova, T. A. (2018). Architecture of the German Consulate in Harbin (Pristan district). In New Ideas of the New Century – 2018, Vol. 1. (pp. 438–443). Khabarovsk: Pacific National University).
32. Shipkov, G. N. (Ed). (1935, September 4). Zarya: Daily democratic newspaper. Harbin: M. S. Lembich.
33. Murashev, G. T., & Kaufman, E. S. (Eds.) (1928, November 24). Rupor: Daily Evening Democratic Newspaper. Harbin: Pamflet.
34. Shipkov, G. N. (Ed). (1937, September 15). Zarya: Daily democratic newspaper. Harbin: M. S. Lembich.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the study on the topic "Consulates of different countries in Harbin in the first third of the XX century" was the peculiarities of architecture and location of consular buildings in the urban environment of the Russian city of Harbin in China. The methodology of architectural research includes a comprehensive architectural and urban planning and comparative analysis of architectural structures of a certain typological group of public buildings - consular buildings - in the context of the current historical urban environment, historical time, socio-political situation. Despite the currently quite extensive historiography of Harbin's architectural history, addressing this particular topic is not without relevance. The main thing is that through representative buildings of various countries, it is possible to record not only the key objects of the architectural panorama, but also the objective international status of Russian Harbin in the first third of the twentieth century. By focusing on one typological group, it is possible to identify its architectural features characteristic of all countries and the features of a certain chronological stage, which will constitute the theoretical value of the study. There is some scientific novelty in the study, but it is not great. A year ago, Urban Studies (2023-2) published an article by T. A. Smolyaninova on a similar, albeit broader, topic "Consular buildings as an image of foreign architecture in the cities of Northeast China." And this is not the only article by the specified author on this topic. The reviewed article sometimes repeats some sentences from previous articles. There is no T. A. Smolyaninova's article in the bibliography list. Unfortunately, the new names of the architects have not been established (there are no archives in the bibliography; the names of the architects are available in the AVPRI funds) The design drawings of the consulates were not found, and the author had to limit himself to analyzing exclusively the external architectural appearance from archival and modern photographs, full-scale surveys. As can be seen, the author did not set himself the goal of analyzing all the identified and preserved structures. The building of the German consulate in Harbin, which is extremely interesting in its architecture (according to the author, built in 1909), has not been stylistically analyzed, although it represents a rare example of German national romanticism in China, which allows us to speculate about the ways of penetration of European styles into China (in Zhang Huai Shen's book "Architecture of Harbin", it is indicated that In 1990, it was the management office of Harbin Polytechnic Institute). In conclusion, there are not enough conclusions of the architectural plan. There are comments on the style of presentation, for example: - in the "Russian" Harbin. The use of quotation marks is not required in this case, this is an ingrained phrase in emigrant studies; -the triangular pediment with columns of the Corinthian order of the main protruding volume and the dome on the right side of the volume create the impression of the neighborhood of several objects; -the multi-scale elements of the building are of visual interest; -projecting portal towers and bay windows, domes and tents are parts of buildings, not details; -incorrect use of the term "component", etc. examples of unsuccessful, inaccurate, incorrect expressions are technical errors: -author A. A. Lisitsyn (male. gender); -name of the structural unit: "Consular offices of different countries" -organized (typo?) and other shortcomings. It would not hurt to illustrate the location of consulates in Harbin on its master plan. Although the bibliography is presented satisfactorily in terms of volume (20 titles), it does not contain the main author, a historian dealing specifically with Russian missions abroad in the first third of the twentieth century, E. M. Mironova. I recommend the article for revision.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The author submitted his article "Consulates of different countries in Harbin in the first third of the 20th century" to the journal Urbanistics, which examines the architectural and socio-cultural features of the international representative offices of the city of Northeast China. The author proceeds in studying this issue from the fact that the modern stage of urban development in Northeast China began at the end of the XIX century and is associated with the beginning of the construction of the Chinese-Eastern Railway (CER) as the first railway line in the region. A feature of this development, the author notes the almost complete disregard for the established historical Chinese and Manchurian settlements, as a result of which new cities were built either on practically undeveloped sites or at some distance from the established national settlements. This approach allowed us to test new urban planning techniques. Thus, the city of Harbin was completely designed and built by Russian engineers during the construction of the Chinese-Eastern Railway (CER). In a short time, two main districts were formed in the city: the New City, where the main administrative offices and employee houses are located, and the Marina, a commercial and industrial district. The theoretical basis of the study was the works of such Russian researchers as Vivdych M.A., Lisitsyn A.A., Troitskaya T.Yu., Smolyaninova T.A. and others. The empirical base consists of archival documentary and cartographic materials, articles from periodicals. The materials studied helped the author to systematize information about the buildings where the consular offices were located, as well as about the time of their work and how and when the consulates appeared in Harbin. The methodological basis of the study was an integrated approach containing historical, socio-cultural, stylistic analysis, as well as content analysis of various journalistic sources and cartographic materials. The purpose of this study is to analyze the stylistic architectural features of the buildings of foreign consulates and their socio-cultural functions. Analyzing the degree of scientific elaboration of the problem, the author notes a sufficient number of domestic scientific works devoted to the architecture of Manchurian cities. The scientific novelty of this study was the description and analysis of the consulates of Harbin. The author defines the appearance and interaction of consulates and diplomatic missions in Harbin and the development of economic and political relations, especially in the context of the construction of the Russian Railway in China. The diplomatic presence in Harbin is an important part of the historical context. Harbin city has become a center of intercultural communication due to favorable conditions for the development and conduct of business activities. The influx of a diverse population led to the formation of various national diasporas, which brought part of their culture to the rapidly developing new city, which was reflected in the architectural and historical heritage. Consulates, as a rule, became the center of the socio-cultural life of these diasporas. Based on the analysis, the author notes that at the beginning of the twentieth century, there were 19 consulates general, consulates and representative offices of various countries in Russian Harbin, as well as two diplomatic bureaus and a military mission of Japan. During the research, the author discovered 30 consular facilities, including one unrealized project of the consular complex. The choice of location was determined not only by its strategic position in the urban structure, but also by the degree of emotional impact. Attention was also paid to the decoration of buildings, the author traced the desire to emphasize the national identity of representative offices with the help of decorative architectural elements. In conclusion, the author presents the conclusions of the study, including all the key provisions of the presented material. It seems that the author in his material touched upon relevant and interesting issues for modern socio-humanitarian knowledge, choosing a topic for analysis, consideration of which in scientific research discourse will entail certain changes in the established approaches and directions of analysis of the problem addressed in the presented article. The results obtained allow us to assert that the study of the influence of intercultural interactions, political and economic factors on the formation of the urban environment is of undoubted theoretical and practical cultural interest and can serve as a source of further research. The material presented in the work has a clear, logically structured structure that contributes to a more complete assimilation of the material. An adequate choice of methodological base also contributes to this. The text of the article is designed in a scientific style, but needs correction, as it contains spelling errors. The bibliographic list consists of 34 sources, including foreign ones, which seems sufficient for generalization and analysis of scientific discourse on the studied problem. However, the author needs to make a list in accordance with GOST and the requirements of the editorial board. It can be said that the author fulfilled his goal, obtained certain scientific results, and showed knowledge of the studied issues. It should be stated that the article may be of interest to readers and deserves to be published in a reputable scientific publication after the specified flaw has been eliminated.

Third Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the research in the article submitted for publication in the journal Urbanistics, as the author conditionally indicated in the title ("Consulates of different countries in Harbin in the first third of the XX century"), is a set of historical buildings in Harbin, where consular offices of different countries were located in the first third of the XX century. Although the author does not specify the object of his attention separately, from the characteristics of the degree of study of the topic of interest to the author, it can be concluded that the object of research is the historical architecture of Harbin in the first third of the XX century. The author emphasized that in addition to scientific literature, he analyzed a certain volume of newspapers and published reference books of the time he was interested in. The materials studied, according to the author, allowed him to establish "that 19 consulates general, consulates and representative offices of various countries, as well as two diplomatic bureaus and the military mission of Japan, functioned in Russian Harbin," and in total — 30 historical consular facilities, "including one unrealized project of the consular complex," which are far from all have survived to the present day, and the remaining ones are not all protected as architectural monuments and need further study, including historical and cultural expertise, with the aim of possible conservation, restoration and other works to ensure their safety. According to the reviewer, the author touches upon one of the urgent problems of preserving the Russian architectural heritage abroad and, of course, this topic needs further research. The author has carefully restored the historical panorama of the location of the buildings of the consular offices in Harbin and the main features of the architectural style of most of them. The analysis allowed the author to conclude that most consular offices were located in the New Town area, which was distinguished not only by representative buildings, but also by a more developed infrastructure, which was important for symbolizing political dominance not only architectural solutions of buildings, but also "a well-chosen location for consulates", due to the "strategic position in the urban structure" and the "degree of emotional impact". The author also drew attention to the fact that the architecture of the consular buildings "shows a desire to emphasize the national identity" of the consulate. However, this opinion is expressed somewhat paradoxically in the conclusions by the author: "If we analyze the consular buildings, we can see that there is a desire to emphasize national identity in their architecture," as if the analysis did not precede the conclusion. According to the reviewer, this statement should be formulated in the conclusion more specifically, without the subjunctive mood. In general, the results obtained by the author are of scientific value. Thus, the subject of the study was considered by the author at a theoretical level sufficient for publication in a reputable scientific journal, but the reviewer has some comments regarding design flaws: 1) it is necessary to bring the design of footnotes to the literature in square brackets in the text to the general standard required by the editorial board; 2) the editorial board also recommends adhering to a strict standard for the use of dates (see editorial requirements: https://nbpublish.com/e_urb/info_106.html ); 3) it is necessary to bring the style of descriptions of sources and literature in the bibliography to a single standard (see recommended by the editorial board of GOST), in including: the names of archives of unpublished sources are described completely without abbreviations, the descriptions of abstracts and dissertations have the rules for abbreviating descriptions established by GOST. The research methodology is subordinated to the purpose of systematization of information about buildings where consular offices were located. Accordingly, the author carried out a thematic and cross-selection of published and unpublished sources, attribution of preserved historical buildings and the location of those that have not been preserved. The author's methodological complex is relevant to the cognitive tasks being solved. The results obtained by the author are beyond doubt. The author justifies the relevance of the chosen topic by saying that "the city of Harbin was designed and built by Russian engineers during the construction of the Chinese-Eastern Railway (CER)," therefore, the preserved historical architecture of the consular buildings is important for preserving the Russian architectural heritage abroad. The scientific novelty of the presented research, which consists in clarifying the panorama of the historical development of consular buildings and their partial attribution, deserves theoretical attention. The style of the text is generally scientific (with the exception of the design flaws noted above). The structure of the article reflects the logic of presenting the results of scientific research. The bibliography sufficiently reveals the problematic field of research, but its design needs a little revision, taking into account the requirements of the editorial board and GOST. The appeal to the opponents is quite correct and, given the empirical nature of the study, can be considered sufficient, although the author avoids sharp theoretical discussions. The article is certainly of interest to the readership of the journal "Urbanistics" and after a little revision can be recommended for publication.