Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

History magazine - researches
Reference:

The role of boarding houses in the urban housing system funds of Moscow at the turn of the XIX–XX centuries

Orchakova Larisa Gennadievna

ORCID: 0000-0001-9559-9930

Doctor of History

Professor; Department of History; Moscow City University

129226, Russia, Moscow, Agricultural ave., 4, 3413

OrchakovaLG@mgpu.ru
Ilmiev Roman Imranovich

ORCID: 0009-0007-8714-7580

Postgraduate student; Department of History of the Institute of Humanities; Moscow City Pedagogical University

129347, Russia, Moscow, Prokhodchikov str., 1, sq. 84

ilmievri@mgpu.ru

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0609.2024.4.71172

EDN:

WWXPWM

Received:

01-07-2024


Published:

08-07-2024


Abstract: The subject of this study is apartment buildings in Moscow during the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries, and their significance in the context of the urbanization and industrialization of the city. The research aims to investigate the architectural features, functional characteristics, and socio-economic impact of these apartment buildings on the urban landscape. Special attention is paid to the quantitative and qualitative growth of these structures, as well as their contribution to addressing the issue of housing shortages in light of rapid urban population expansion. The focus of the study is on apartment buildings in Moscow during this period. The article examines specific examples of these buildings, their architectural design, construction stages, ownership, and occupancy. Attention is given to analyzing how these buildings were integrated into the city's infrastructure and influenced Moscow's appearance. The research employs diachronic, statistical, and chronological methods. The novelty of this study lies in its exploration of the previously understudied history of apartment houses in Moscow from a financial, economic, and social perspective. Apartment buildings played a significant role in Moscow's urban life. On the one hand, they provided housing for different segments of the population, making housing more accessible and helping to solve the problem of housing shortages. It was common to rent a room or apartment. On the other hand, apartment buildings became not only a social, but also an economic phenomenon. They were attractive for investing capital and contributed to their proliferation. The success of constructing such buildings led to the formation of joint-stock companies that focused on building apartments. These companies invested in real estate projects, expecting to generate significant profits from renting out apartments. The emergence of these companies indicates that the residential real estate market was a lucrative business.


Keywords:

Moscow, Moscow studies, the history of Moscow, boarding houses, households, homeowners, urbanization, architecture, entrepreneurs, merchants

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

The nineteenth century in Russian history was marked by several important processes, such as the industrial revolution, high rates of industrialization, associated urbanization and social transformation. The number of cities has steadily grown, as has the population in them. The Statistical Department established under the Ministry of Internal Affairs began to collect systematic statistics on cities, towns and their populations. By the end of the reign of Alexander I, it is indicated that there are 533 full–time cities in the Russian Empire, 102 minor cities (Full-time cities are operating administrative centers. Small towns and settlements that were formerly official cities, then lost this status, but retained urban privileges for their urban inhabitants) [3, pp. 35-44] and 51 towns and villages with a population of 3,564,457 "male and female" people [33]. The population of Moscow by this period was 246,494 people of both sexes [33]. By the middle of the century, namely in 1856, there were 678 cities (of which: 28 cities – large, 295 – medium and 355 – small) (We believe that in Russia it is possible to recognize, relative to the population, large cities – those in which the number of inhabitants is above 25 thousand souls of both sexes; medium - sized cities with a population of 5 to 25 thousand souls; small – cities with less than 5 thousand inhabitants) [31, p. 298], 48 townships, 1312 towns [31, p. 250]. In total, 5,683,999 urban residents lived in them [31, p. 262]. There were already 368,765 people living in Moscow, an increase of 50% in the second quarter of the 19th century. By the end of the century, these figures had become even more impressive. The 1897 census recorded 16,604,086 people [24, p. 38] living in 876 cities [9, p. 2]. Moscow crossed the line of one million inhabitants (1,035,664 people), and by 1907 more than 1.3 million people lived in the city [32, pp. 9-10].

By the beginning of the 20th century, not only the quantitative characteristics of cities had changed. The city, while remaining an administrative, commercial and cultural center, becomes the center of industrial development. Moscow is also becoming a major railway transport hub. If we take into account the traditional architecture of the second capital (these are low-rise buildings, and in the XVIII century urban estates became the face of the city), then of course overpopulation and lack of housing becomes an age-old problem in Moscow. Apartment buildings, which have been massively built in Moscow since the 1890s, become one of the solutions to this issue and at the turn of the XIX-XX centuries determine the appearance of the city.

In Russian historiography, the problems of urban development and their functioning have been studied primarily by Medievalists. Among them are M. M. Kovalevsky [15; 16], A. K. Dzhivelegov [12], D. M. Petrushevsky [25], Ya. A. Levitsky [18; 19], A. L. Yastrebitskaya [36] and many others.

Studies of the urbanization of Russia in modern times attracted the attention of researchers both before the revolution and in the Soviet period, such as M. G. Dikanskaya [13], I. H. Ozerov [23], V. V. Svyatlovsky [29], V. V. Vanchugov [5]. A special emphasis on the study of urban architecture in this period was made by G. V. Baranovsky [2], E. I. Kirichenko [28] and M. V. Nashchokina [20; 21; 22]. D. M. Demidovich [11], E. K. Yukhneva [35], as well as a number of other researchers focused on the study of apartment buildings directly. However, their research concerns apartment buildings in St. Petersburg, while the history of the development of apartment buildings in Moscow and other Russian cities has not been given substantive attention. Often in generalizing works we find only a mention.

In this article, the authors, analyzing documents, statistical reports, periodical publications and other sources, aim to study apartment buildings in Moscow at the turn of the XIX–XX centuries as a landmark phenomenon of the industrialization process in Russia, as well as to identify the main trends in the development of the urban housing stock in Moscow during this historical period through an analysis of the structure and functions apartment buildings, as well as their impact on the socio-economic development of the city.

The research is based on diachronic, statistical and chronological methods.

The diachronic method allows us to look at the changes and development of apartment buildings over time, tracing their historical evolution and influence on the appearance of Moscow. The statistical method is used to analyze the collected data on apartment buildings, including their number, number of floors, etc. The chronological method helps to organize information about the construction and development of apartment buildings, which in turn allows you to see their role in the urbanization of Moscow and identify key stages in their development.

Thus, the use of these methods allows us to obtain a comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the phenomenon under study.

By 1917, there were over 800 apartment buildings in Moscow [6]. There were several reasons for their construction, but two of the most significant ones can be named:

1. An increase in the urban population. At the beginning of the XX century, Moscow was one of the largest cities of the Russian Empire and its population continued to grow actively, which caused the problem of housing shortage. In this context, the construction of apartment buildings has become one of the options for its solution;

2. The economic and social state of Moscow at the turn of the XIX-XX centuries. In the late XIX – early XX centuries. Moscow is becoming a major industrial and commercial center. During this period, there were more than 750 factories and plants within its borders, the total number of commercial and industrial establishments was more than 33.5 thousand units. 18 railway lines were moving away from Moscow, and the overall productivity of the city was increasing.

In this regard, the issue of investing in urban infrastructure, including the construction of apartment buildings, is becoming one of the most interesting for the growth of merchant capital, one of the priorities of Russian industrialists and entrepreneurs [17, pp. 129-221]. A contemporary of the era, Russian economist and historian Vladimir Svyatlovsky wrote about this period: "Soon the urban population turned out to be inadequate to the number of available premises, and despite periods of construction fever, our cities, which already did not satisfy the natural population growth, completely failed to accommodate the new masses of the alien population. Furnished rooms and hotels that appeared in many places did not help either." [29, p. 2].

The shortage of places to live in Moscow persisted even after the revolution and the civil war. So, Mikhail Bulgakov noted: "Let's agree once and for all: housing is the main stone of human life. Let's take it as an axiom: a person cannot exist without a home. Now, in addition to this, I inform everyone living in Berlin, Paris, London and other places – there are no apartments in Moscow" (Bulgakov M. A. Moscow of the 20s). Historians studying antiquity identified the lack of housing as one of the cornerstone problems already in Ancient Rome. Within the boundaries of the ancient metropolis, an attempt was made to rethink the expansion of cities not in breadth, but upwards – a new type of real estate came to replace small private houses (households) – apartment buildings – insula (from the Latin "island") [27, pp. 57-58]. These can be called prototypes of future apartment buildings. The fall of the Western Roman Empire and the Great Migration of Peoples in the early Middle Ages led to a halt in the construction and improvement of cities, deterioration of sanitary and hygienic standards and cultural decline. Residential development now depended on both the legacy of a bygone era and the geographical component. A new wave of urban regeneration was already taking place during the High Middle Ages, when cities became primarily commercial and craft centers. These are mostly low-rise buildings.

In the article "A house in a medieval city through the eyes of a Parisian artisan of the XIII century," Doctor of Historical Sciences E. N. Kirillov notes that craft and trade regulations allow you to see the life of a medieval city through the eyes of their inhabitants. He also mentions that from the point of view of the concepts "house" and "workshop" are synonymous: they were small single-storey houses [14, pp. 408-415]. Over time, cities again faced a shortage of space, but it is still too early to talk about the mass construction of public housing in this period [8, p. 158]. But even in this state, renting out rooms and apartments was a common phenomenon of the European medieval city.

There was a different historical experience in Russia. One of the characteristic urban phenomena was Gostiny Dvor, which was a two-story building with galleries and an inner courtyard. Shops, offices and warehouses were located on the ground floors, and the upper floors were rented out for housing or used as hotels for visiting merchants. The courtyard served as a place for unloading goods. To date, a number of gostiny dvors have been preserved in Moscow, among them the courtyard erected in the 1790s-1830s. located on Ilyinka Street, house 4 (Fig. 1), as well as the Krasheninnikov house, built in the 1810s-1830s and located at 17 Pokrovka Street. The profitable houses that appeared in the XVIII century, primarily in St. Petersburg, were borrowed from the West.

At the same time, as England, France and Germany become the locomotives of the development of the capitalist mode of production, cities become industrial centers and hired labor rushes there, the rapid growth of multi-storey construction for rent, i.e. apartment buildings, begins. The boom in such construction can be attributed to the middle of the XVIII century. It is also important to note that the construction itself is becoming the subject of business development.

Изображение выглядит как строительство, на открытом воздухе, небо, монохромный  Автоматически созданное описание

Fig. 1. View from the Exchange to Gostiny Dvor and the apartment building of the Troitskiy farmstead. 1887. The author of the photo: Nikolay Naydenov (1834-1905).

The first conditional apartment building in Moscow was designed by the famous architect Matvey Kazakov for the merchant of the 1st guild Ivan Khryashchev in the last third of the XVIII century. Now the address of this house is 10-12 Ilyinka Street. It saw a domestic tradition, an updated version of Gostiny dvor (Fig. 2). The house was intended for small and medium-sized merchants: there were shops on the ground floors, and apartments on the upper floors.

Изображение выглядит как зарисовка, строительство, Правительственное здание  Автоматически созданное описание

Fig. 2. Khryashchev's house on Ilyinka. The facade and the section. Source: Albums of M. F. Kazakov's particular structures.

Khryashchev's house was designed in the classical style, consisted of two- and three-storey blocks located around the perimeter of the site, thus creating an inner courtyard. The main facade of the building was symmetrical and austere, divided into three levels, with each level decorated in a single style. On the first level of the facade there were large arched windows, which were "supported" by massive pilasters. The second and third levels of the facade had rectangular windows. The roof of the building had no additional decorative elements, which corresponds to the strict style of classicism. Due to the clear symmetry, simplicity and rigor of the lines, as well as the absence of excessive decorativeness, the house looked majestic and monumental [1]. In the late 1880s, under the guidance of architect Roman Klein, the building was rebuilt [4, p. 36].

Until the second half of the 19th century, many land plots in Moscow were not full-fledged possessions. This is due to the fact that a significant part of these sites were actually empty. The reason was that people who had funds preferred to invest them in land and expected to receive income from its subsequent sale or lease. This practice was widespread because land was considered a reliable and promising asset that could grow significantly in value over time. However, in the late XIX – early XX centuries. Moscow was gripped by a real construction fever. During this period, the city rapidly developed and modernized, which led to the active construction of residential and public buildings, as well as industrial infrastructure.

These words are confirmed by data on the increase in the number of apartments in Moscow in the period from 1871 to 1902 (Table 1.).

Table 1. Increase in the number of apartments in Moscow [30, p. 3; 7, p. 14]

Year

Number of apartments, units.

Absolute increase, units.

Relative increase, %

1871

46 843

1882

83 100

36 257

177

1898/1899

112 949

29 849

136

1902

130 741

17 792

116

Construction was especially intensive in the 1880s and 1900s, when Moscow was experiencing significant economic growth and population growth. The role of apartment buildings during this period became very significant.

Apartment buildings were multi-family apartment buildings built to generate income from renting apartments. Most often in Moscow, such houses were 4-6-storey buildings. It should be noted that by 1902 the Moscow possessions, especially in the central part of the city, were built up quite densely, and therefore higher and higher apartment buildings began to appear, while outside the Kamer-Collegiate Shaft they still grew in breadth and did not exceed 3-4 floors [7, p. 19].

The differences began with the very type of apartment building. Elite apartment buildings, or manor-type houses, were built in Moscow for wealthy tenants, as a rule they were large officials, entrepreneurs and other prominent figures. These houses had spacious apartments with high ceilings, expensive finishes and modern amenities at that time, such as an elevator, running water, heating and a telephone. As an example, we can mention the Apartment Building of the insurance company "Russia" (Sretensky Boulevard, 6/1) and the House of Pertsova (Kursovoy Lane, 1).

Apartment buildings for the "middle class" were built for privileged officials, merchants, small entrepreneurs and intellectuals. The apartments in such houses were less luxurious, but still comfortable and with certain amenities. Examples of such houses can be found on Arbat and Prechistenka: the Bocharov apartment building (Gogolevsky Boulevard, 21, p. 1) and Zavarsky's house (Potapovsky lane, 10).

The last on the list are houses with furnished and bed-and-breakfast apartments. These options were the most popular types of housing at that time, as evidenced by data on empty apartments in Moscow in 1902 [7, p. 45], artisans, domestic servants, students and workers usually settled in them. As an example, let's give the house of cheap apartments named after G. G. Solodovnikov (Gilyarovsky Street, 57, 65c1), as well as the Nirnsee house (Bolshoy Gnezdnikovsky Lane, 10).

It is worth noting that at first apartment buildings were built for representatives of the same class, but over time this also changed – nobles, civil servants, bankers and the working class could live side by side in one house. Thus, there was a practice in Moscow when the first floors of apartment buildings were usually occupied by shops, shops, salons and offices. Apartments for employees of banks, insurance companies and creative intelligentsia were located on the second floors. At the beginning of the century, these apartments were already equipped with some amenities such as running water and sewerage. They included from 3 to 4 rooms, and the rent ranged from 50 to 100 rubles per month. The most expensive and prestigious were the third floors, where there were "lordly apartments" consisting of 5-15 rooms. The rent of such apartments exceeded 120-140 rubles/month. In addition to the usual amenities, these apartments could be equipped with artesian wells, fireplaces, ventilation, private bathrooms and good furniture. Above the third floors there were cheap 1-2 room apartments, furnished rooms and bunk apartments. The cost of renting the first was about 10 rubles/month, and bed-and-bunk apartments were rented for 5 rubles / month.

Investing in apartment buildings became popular among merchants, who saw them as a new source of income. Such houses, also called "speculative", brought merchants maximum profit from renting out housing, often to the detriment of the comfort of residents and sanitary conditions [29, pp. 11-17]. However, despite this, the rental housing market has flourished. At that time, investing money in real estate was one of the most profitable and relatively safe ways to increase capital; in addition, it also met the social demand for housing for the population. An absolutely common way to save and even increase capital for wealthy citizens was to buy up land plots for subsequent construction on them to build new houses for rent. It should be noted at once that such an investment was beneficial to the city, with the help of which the city budget was replenished. Among them were not only representatives of the merchant class, but also the nobility. Industrialists, the church, architects and engineers, priests and even peasants became investors and owners of apartment buildings.

The first true apartment house in terms of functionality and purpose in Moscow was the Golitsyna — Batyushkova apartment house (24 Bolshaya Nikitskaya Street), built in the early 40s of the XIX century and preserved to the present day. The four-storey house was built by architect and founder of the Moscow Architectural Society Mikhail Dorimedontovich Bykovsky (1801-1885) by order of Princess A. P. Golitsyna. Golitsyna's apartment building was similar to Gostiny Dvor in that shops and offices were located on the ground floors. It was a 4-storey building in height, made in the Art Nouveau style.

In 1873, the ownership of Golitsyna was bought by the historian, ethnographer and speaker of the Moscow City Duma Pompey Nikolaevich Batyushkov (1811-1892).

Among the first apartment buildings should be mentioned the apartment houses of the merchant of the 1st guild, honorary citizen of Moscow Vasily Medyntsev (Pokrovsky Boulevard, house 6/20 – Khokhlovsky Lane, house 20/6), Ivan Ivanovich Karzinkin (Stoleshnikov Lane, house 11) and the apartment complex of Konon Nikonovich Golofteev (Bolshaya Dmitrovka, house 10/2 — Dmitrovsky Lane, house 2/10). All of them were built according to the project of Karneev (Korneev) Vasily Nikolaevich (1831-1895). The last two were for merchants of the first guild Konon Nikonovich Golofteev (1822-1896) and Ivan Ivanovich Karzinkin (1822-1889).

Since the 80s of the XIX century, the construction of apartment buildings in Moscow has become widespread [26].

In 1912, the famous Moscow architect Ernst Karlovich Niernsee (1873-1934) built the Babanin apartment house (Klimentovsky Lane, house 6) by order of merchant Mikhail Ivanovich Babanin. The uniqueness of the house lies in the fact that at that time it was one of the tallest buildings in Moscow. Its height is 8 floors.

In 1913, according to the project of the no less famous Moscow architect Valentin Evgenyevich Dubovsky (1877-1931), the Filatov apartment building (3/14c1 Ostozhenka Street) was built for Anna Timofeevna Filatova, the wife of Yakov Mikhailovich Filatov, a merchant and trustee of the Moscow Old Believer community of the Rogozhsky Cemetery. Due to its architectural feature – a bell-shaped tent, the house was nicknamed "The House under the glass".

The fact that apartment buildings were built on the capital of the merchants and the nobility is quite logical. But the Russian Orthodox Church was also engaged in the construction of this type of housing. On the territory of Moscow, monasteries, farmsteads, and parishes of the Moscow Diocese owned a significant part of the land holdings. According to the Synod (1890), only the monasteries of Moscow owned 1,393 tithes of land (about 15.2 square kilometers) (Balashova T.V. On the question of the economy of Moscow monasteries in the second half of the XIX – early XX century (on the example of the Spaso-Andronikov Monastery) // IX International Conference – Lomonosov-2002). For understanding, the area of Moscow during this period was 71.4 square kilometers. Having no funds of their own for construction, the churchmen leased land for the construction of profitable houses on them. Thus, indirectly, they became co-investors in their construction. In 1874, by order of the Holy Synod, the first Moscow skyscraper was erected on monastic land – the apartment building of the Trinity courtyard (5/2 Ilyinka Street). The architect was Peter Petrovich Skomoroshenko (1825-1888). The house had an unprecedented height for that time – 5 floors [35, p. 93].

Often, architects and engineers acted not only as authors of the project and technical equipment of buildings (elevators, sewerage, electrification, etc. technical innovations), but as investors, erecting their own apartment buildings, in which they themselves settled. In 1900, the Moscow architect Boris Nikolaevich Shnaubert (1852-1917), famous for the construction of the "Confectionery Mansion" of the Apricots (this house is depicted on the logo of the confectionery concern "Babaevsky"), as well as the Tsvetkov mansion, begins the construction of his own four-storey apartment building (Architect B. N. Shnaubert's own apartment building, Khokhlovsky Lane, house 3c1) on a personal project. After his death, in 1917, the house was inherited by his children, but it was not in their management for long, because after the revolution, the new government turned the house into a hostel.

In 1912, the already mentioned Ernst Niernsee buys a plot of land from a certain A. I. Bystrova, on which he builds an even taller house than the one that was erected for the merchant Mikhail Babanin. The height of the new building is 9 floors. A second, so-called "Cloudcutter" appeared in Moscow, known as the "Nirnsee House" (Bolshoy Gnezdnikovsky Lane, 10). It was in one of the apartments of this house that the architect himself settled. The rest of the apartments began to be rented out. Their area was small – about 40 square meters. meters. The house was aimed at the middle class, who did not have the means to pay for housing in more elite houses.

In this row, it is worth noting the apartment buildings of Ivan Timofeevich Baryutin (1868-1928) (located on Meshchanskaya Street, has not been preserved) and Vasily Ivanovich Myasnikov (1861-1929) (4 Bolshoy Kozikhinsky Lane).

Without a doubt, industrial entrepreneurs were the leaders in the construction of commercial housing. For them, this became a separate direction in their "business". And following the general trends, monopolization is taking place in this business. By the beginning of the 20th century, joint-stock companies were becoming important players in the housing market, for which the construction and operation of apartment buildings was already the main activity.

In 1898, Savva Ivanovich Mamontov (1841-1918), a Russian entrepreneur, a representative of the Mamontov merchant dynasty, formed the "Northern House-Building Society", which directed its efforts to erect mansions for wealthy citizens.

A year later, the Russian banker Yakov Andreevich Rekk founded the Moscow Trade and Construction Joint Stock Company. Obviously, Reck saw the potential of the idea and even developed it – the society began to build not only mansions, but also apartment buildings. In addition, after some time, Reck even bought out Mamontov's company. The same joint-stock company built a number of its own apartment buildings (13 Milyutinsky Lane, Architect: S. V. Sherwood; 4/3 Myasnitsky Proezd. Architects: V. F. Valkot, I. G., Kondratenko), Isakov's apartment building (28 L. N. Kekushev, Prechistenka Street, Moscow) and a number of other buildings.

Insurance companies also acted as builders of apartment buildings, which thus sought to increase their income. Among such companies, one can single out the oldest pre–revolutionary company founded by decree of Alexander III in 1881 - the Insurance Company Rossiya. The most famous project of the company was the complex of buildings (apartment buildings) of the insurance company "Russia", erected in 1899-1902 by three architects – Otto Wilhelmovich von Dessin (1863-1918), Nikolai Mikhailovich Proskurnin (1863-1942) and Viktor Andreevich Velichkin (1863-1921).

The rapid growth of apartment buildings in Moscow at the turn of the XIX–XX centuries was closely related to the development of industry. Industrialization contributed to a rapid increase in the number of jobs, which, in turn, caused an influx of people to the city. People arriving in Moscow in search of work needed a roof over their heads, and apartment buildings became the solution to this problem. Such houses, which were multi-storey buildings with apartments for rent, became an integral part of urban life and a vivid sign of the development of capitalism in Russia. Their appearance and spread testified to the significant social and economic changes taking place in the society of that time.

The apartment buildings reflected the cultural and architectural trends of their time, making a significant contribution to shaping the image of Moscow. The architecture of the apartment buildings was very diverse: from eclecticism to modernity, which made it possible to diversify the urban landscape and give it a unique character. In addition, they have become not only an important element in shaping the architectural appearance of Moscow, but also a historical phenomenon, a marker of urbanization. Under the influence of these changes, Moscow was turning into a major industrial and cultural center of the country.

Apartment buildings played a dual role in the urban life of Moscow. On the one hand, their important social component was that they provided housing for various segments of the population, making it accessible to the wider masses and solving the problem of housing shortage. It was normal to rent a bed or an apartment. On the other hand, apartment buildings have become not only a social but also an economic phenomenon. They represented an attractive object for investing capital, contributing to their multiplication. The financial success of the construction of such houses led to the emergence of joint-stock companies, the main activity of which was the construction of apartment buildings. These companies invested in construction, expecting to make a significant profit from renting apartments. Thus, the very fact of the emergence of such societies indicates that the sphere of residential commercial real estate was a profitable business.

References
1. Architectural albums of M. F. Kazakov. (1956). Moscow, Russia: State Publishing House of Literature on Construction and Architecture.
2. Baranovsky, G. V. (1902–1908). Architectural encyclopedia of the second half of the 19th century.
3. Belov, A. V. (2012). The network of cities and urban settlements of the Russian Empire under Paul I, 35-44. Proceedings of the Faculty of History of Saint Petersburg University.
4. Buseva-Davydova, I. L., et al. (1997). Moscow: An architectural guide. Moscow, Russia: Stroiizdat.
5. Vanchugov, V. V. (1997). Moscovosophy and Petersburgology. Philosophy of the city. Moscow, Russia: RIC Piligrim.
6. Volkodaeva, I. B., & Bogatova, S. S. (2015). Decor of facades of Moscow rental houses. In New trends in the development of humanities. Proceedings of the international scientific-practical conference, 6-10. Rostov-on-Don: Innovative Center for Education and Science Development.
7. Main preliminary data of the census of Moscow city on January 31, 1902. Issue 2: General results of the census of estates and apartments. Vacant apartments. (1902). Moscow, Russia: City Typography.
8. The city in medieval civilization of Western Europe. Vol. 1. The phenomenon of medieval urbanism. (1999). Moscow, Russia: Nauka.
9. Cities and settlements in districts with 2000 or more inhabitants. (1905). St. Petersburg: Steam Typo-Lithography of N.L. Nyrkin.
10. Damashke, A. V. (1904). Tasks of urban economy (V. Ya. Kanel, Trans.). Moscow: D. S. Gorshkov.
11. Demidovich, D. M. (2021). Income houses of St. Petersburg as a social phenomenon (1870s – early 20th century): Candidate of Historical Sciences dissertation. Moscow.
12. Dzhivelegov, A. K. (1902). Medieval cities in Western Europe. St. Petersburg: Brockhaus-Efron.
13. Dikansky, M. G. (1908). The housing problem and social experiments in its solution. St. Petersburg: Printing House of the St. Petersburg City Administration.
14. Kirillova, E. N. (2020). House in a medieval city through the eyes of a Parisian craftsman of the 13th century. Dialogue with Time, 73, 408-415.
15. Kovalevsky, M. M. (2010). Selected works: In 2 parts. Part 2. Moscow, Russia: ROSSPEN.
16. Kovalevsky, M. M. (1900). Economic structure of Russia. Moscow: Typography of P. P. Soykin.
17. Levanov, B. V., Orchakova, L. G., & Sanin, I. I. (2010). Russian patrons and philanthropists of the 19th-20th centuries. In History of Russian entrepreneurship (pp. 129-221). Moscow: Russian University of Friendship of Peoples.
18. Levitsky, Y. A. (1987). City and feudalism in England. Moscow, Russia: Nauka.
19. Levitsky, Y. A. (1960). Cities and urban crafts in England in the 10th-12th centuries. Moscow; Leningrad: Academy of Sciences of the USSR Publishing House.
20. Nashchokina, M. V. (2018). Time of style: On the history of Russian architecture from the late 19th to the early 20th century. St. Petersburg: Kolî Publishing House.
21. Nashchokina, M. V. (2003). Moscow Art Nouveau. Moscow: Giraffe.
22. Nashchokina, M. V. (2000). One hundred architects of Moscow Art Nouveau. Moscow: Giraffe.
23. Ozerov, I. Kh. (1906). Large cities, their tasks and means of administration. Moscow: Publication of the Society of I. D. Sytin.
24. First general census of the population of the Russian Empire in 1897. Vol. 2. Population of cities according to the census of January 28, 1897. (1897). St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Central Statistical Committee of the Ministry of Internal Affairs.
25. Petrushevsky, D. M. (1913). Essays from the history of medieval society and state. Moscow: Nauchnoe slovo.
26. RBC: Real estate. 2017. March 24th.
27Rome: Echo of imperial glory. (1997). Moscow: Terra Publishing Center.
28Russian architecture of the 1830s-1910s. (1982). Moscow: Iskusstvo.
29. Svyatlovskiy, V. V. (1898). The housing question. St. Petersburg: Typography of M. M. Stasyulevich.
30Moscow City and Provincial Statistical Committee. (1874). Statistical information about the residents of Moscow based on the census of December 12, 1871. Moscow.
31Statistical tables of the Russian Empire for the year 1856. (1858). St. Petersburg: Typography of the 2nd Division of His Imperial Majesty's Own Office.
32Statistical atlas of the city of Moscow. Territory, population composition, literacy, and occupations. (1911). Moscow: City Typography.
33Statistical depiction of cities and settlements of the Russian Empire for the year 1825. (1829). St. Petersburg: Ivan Glazunov's Typography.
34. Sytyin, P. V. (2011). From the history of Moscow streets. Moscow: AST.
35. Yukhnyova, E. D. (2019). St. Petersburg rental houses: Essays on the history of everyday life. Unknown facts and new details. Moscow: Centrpoligraf.
36. Yastrebitskaya, A. L. (1978). Western Europe in the 11th-13th centuries. Moscow: Iskusstvo.

Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The great reforms of Alexander II had such a great impact on the life of Russian society that historians distinguish the pre-reform and post-reform period in the history of Russia. Since the 1860s, there has been a rapid growth of cities and urban populations, the formation of industrial centers, and the desire to solve the housing issue. The growing housing crisis has led to the spread of the phenomenon of apartment buildings, which have taken a particularly prominent place in the capitals of St. Petersburg and Moscow. These circumstances determine the relevance of the article submitted for review, the subject of which is apartment buildings in the Moscow city housing stock system at the turn of the XIX–XX centuries. The author sets out to consider the changes and development of apartment buildings over time, tracing their historical evolution and influence on the appearance of Moscow, to identify the main trends in the development of the urban housing stock in Moscow during this historical period through an analysis of the structure and functions of apartment buildings, as well as to show their impact on the socio-economic development of the city. The work is based on the principles of analysis and synthesis, reliability, objectivity, the methodological basis of the research is a systematic approach, which is based on the consideration of the object as an integral complex of interrelated elements. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the very formulation of the topic: the author seeks to characterize the role of apartment buildings in the urban housing stock of Moscow at the turn of the XIX–XX centuries. Considering the bibliographic list of the article, as a positive point, we note its versatility: in total, the list of references includes 36 different sources and studies, which in itself indicates the amount of preparatory work that its author has done. From the sources attracted by the author, we note the data of the Population Census of 1897 and other published statistical data. Of the studies used, we will point to the works of D.M. Demidovich and M.V. Nashchokina, whose focus is on various aspects of studying the urban environment. Note that the bibliography of the article is important both from a scientific and educational point of view: after reading the text of the article, readers can turn to other materials on its topic. In general, in our opinion, the integrated use of various sources and research contributed to the solution of the tasks facing the author. The style of writing the article can be attributed to a scientific one, at the same time accessible to understanding not only to specialists, but also to a wide readership, to everyone who is interested in both urbanism in general and apartment buildings in particular. The appeal to the opponents is presented at the level of the collected information received by the author during the work on the topic of the article. The structure of the work is characterized by a certain logic and consistency, it can be distinguished by an introduction, the main part, and conclusion. At the beginning, the author determines the relevance of the topic, shows that the reasons for the construction of apartment buildings in Moscow were the increase in the urban population and the economic and social condition of Moscow at the turn of the XIX-XX centuries. The work notes that "the architecture of apartment buildings was very diverse: from eclecticism to modernity, which made it possible to diversify the urban landscape and give it a unique character." The author shows that apartment buildings "represented an attractive object for investing capital, contributing to their multiplication." In fact, as stated in the peer-reviewed article, "the financial success of the construction of such houses led to the emergence of joint-stock companies whose main activity was the construction of apartment buildings." The main conclusion of the article is that "apartment buildings reflected the cultural and architectural trends of their time, making a significant contribution to the formation of the image of Moscow," while at the turn of the XIX – XX centuries. "the residential commercial real estate sector was a profitable business." The article submitted for review is devoted to an urgent topic, will arouse readers' interest, is provided with 2 figures and a table, and its materials can be used both in lecture courses on the history of Russia and in various special courses. In general, in our opinion, the article can be recommended for publication in the journal "Historical Journal: Scientific research".