Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Culture and Art
Reference:

Polyphony in D. Shostakovich's a cappella choral work

Koshkareva Natalya Vladimirovna

PhD in Art History

Professor, Head of the Department of Conducting an Academic Chorus, State Musical and Pedagogical Institute named after M. M. Ippolitov-Ivanov

109147 Marksistskaya street, Moscow, 109147 Russian Federation

nkoshkarevav.@gmail.com
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0625.2024.7.71072

EDN:

YMRUTG

Received:

19-06-2024


Published:

19-07-2024


Abstract: The purpose of this article is to identify the role of polyphony in choral a cappella music of Russian compositional writing of the twentieth century. The subject of the study is the a cappella choral work of Dmitry Shostakovich. The object of the research is to consider the polyphonic techniques in the works "Ten poems of revolutionary poets", "Two treatments of Russian folk songs for unaccompanied choir", "Fidelity". The author examines in detail the polyphonic means in the choral heritage of the great Russian composer. Special attention is paid to polyphonic methods in a cappella choral works. The author states that D. Shostakovich's polyphony is distinguished by its depth and semantic concentration. The appeal to imitation, sub-vocal and contrasting polyphony in D. Shostakovich's a cappella choral compositions is characterized by an individual approach to solving a creative idea.  The methodology consists in the synthesis of research methods, including musicology, poetics and choral studies. On the basis of this synthesis, the parameters of the musical composition are revealed: the analyzed genre specifics and polyphonic means, the features of choral writing. The main conclusion of the research is the paradigm of a deep stylistic synthesis of secular and spiritual principles in the works of D. Shostakovich. This position has become a determining factor for polyphony as the dominant principle of the composer's musical thinking. Attention is focused on the need to study the polyphony associated with the genre and style features of choral compositions for unaccompanied choir due not only to the general artistic and historical potential of choral culture in general, but also especially to its great importance in modern musical art. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that for the first time polyphony in the works of D. Shostakovich is analyzed from the standpoint of musicology and choral studies. The author's special contribution to the disclosure of the topic is the study of the works "Ten poems by revolutionary poets", "Two arrangements of Russian folk songs for unaccompanied choir", "Fidelity", which had not previously been the object of special research.


Keywords:

Dmitry Dmitrievich Shostakovich, choral art, verses of revolutionary poets, Russian folk songs, Fidelity, choral polyphony, subvocal polyphony, imitative polyphony, contrasting polyphony, creative method

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

Russian compositional work of the second half of the twentieth century presents a wide panorama of artistic trends and musical styles. This period testifies to the great interest of Russian composers and performers in polyphony. The global impact of polyphony on the system of musical means is a general trend of the era. In choral music, a cappella polyphony performs at all compositional levels: genre, form, writing technique. Composers create original artistic solutions based on numerous composition techniques that have arisen in Western European music (dodecaphony, pointillism, sonorica), combining them with national intonation systems. The technical and stylistic factor determining the essence of these changes was reflected in the form, structure, ways of embodying the poetic text and new timbre solutions, as "updating within the canon" (A. Aranovsky) [2]. In the works of the greatest masters N. Myaskovsky, G. Popov, D. Shostakovich, S. Prokofiev, polyphony appears in traditional melodic and intonation forms for Russian music, which receive a new embodiment.

In this perspective, the most important place belongs to the polyphony of D. Shostakovich (1906-1975), where the formation of grandiose symphonic concepts occurs through the cultivation of their initial impulses – "thematic grains". This applies not only to major works for symphony orchestra, musical theater, instrumental music, but also choral opuses. Although there are not so many compositions for the a cappella choir in the composer's legacy of D. Shostakovich, they have become a kind of chronicle of the era: "Ten poems based on the words of revolutionary poets of the late XIX and early XX centuries for unaccompanied mixed choir", Op. 88 (1951) Two arrangements of Russian folk songs, for unaccompanied choir, Op. 104 (1957) and "Fidelity", eight ballads based on the words of E. Dolmatovsky for unaccompanied male choir, Op. 136 (1970).

Monographs by L. Mikheeva [10], S. Khentova [18], K. Meyer [9], L. Hakobyan [1], separate articles by V. Protopopov [12], Yu. Kholopov [18, 19] are devoted to the general characteristics of D. Shostakovich's work. Polyphony as a creative method in the major works of D. Shostakovich was studied by N. Gerasimova-Persianskaya [3], I. Kuznetsov [8]. The analysis of 24 preludes and fugues by D. Shostakovich is presented in the monograph by A. Dolzhansky [6].

However, the inexhaustible depth and vivid individuality of polyphony in D. Shostakovich's a cappella choral music has not yet found proper understanding in scientific works, this determines the relevance of the chosen topic. The novelty of the study lies in the fact that it offers a different interpretation of D. Shostakovich's choral legacy from the existing ones. The object of our research will be compositions for unaccompanied choir. The purpose of the study is to determine the stylistic features of D. Shostakovich's polyphonic writing in works for unaccompanied choir. The methodology is based on the synthesis of historical-biographical and musical-stylistic analysis techniques. In this regard, it should be noted that the solution of the tasks set required the study of theoretical works on various issues of polyphony: T. Muller [11], V. Fraenov [17], S. Skrebkov [15], N. Simakova [13, 14], I. Kuznetsov [7, 16].

Let's turn to the cycle "Ten poems on the words of revolutionary poets" (1951) by D. Shostakovich. It is based on the texts of poets of the late XIX — early XX century: L. Radin, E. Tarasov, A. Gmyrev, A. Kotz, V. Tan-Bogoraz (from W. Whitman). The composer confessed his sincere enthusiasm for the project, as this was his first experience in the field of music for unaccompanied choir (with the exception of small choral episodes from film music).

The appeal to the revolutionary theme was not accidental. In 1948, D. Shostakovich, along with some other Soviet composers, was accused of "formalism". This did not force the composer to abandon his creative principles, but it was absolutely impossible to ignore such accusations in the USSR. D. Shostakovich had to make efforts to rehabilitate himself in the eyes of the authorities. To this end, Dmitry Dmitrievich creates an oratorio based on the poems of Evgeny Dolmatovsky "Song of the Forests", which tells about the creation of forest belts – a very relevant topic for that time, music for films, the ideological orientation of which could not be doubted ("The Fall of Berlin", "Young Guard"). The work on choral works on a revolutionary theme was in the same vein.

The composer told about the history of the creation of the cycle: "In the process of working on music for historical revolutionary films, I studied revolutionary songs a lot and carefully, which resulted in my Ten poems for chorus based on poems by revolutionary poets of the late XIX and early XX centuries <...> Poems are perhaps my first experience in the field of music for unaccompanied choir, except for small choral episodes from film music. I'm going to continue this experience in the future. I am genuinely passionate about working for choirs. The State Choir of Russian Song will be the first performer of my new works. In-depth, subtle work on each poem by this wonderful team and its leader A. Sveshnikov gives me a lot of valuable things as an author" [21, p. 2].

Behind the revolutionary texts in the "Ten Poems" lies a complex multiparameter stylistic synthesis. Three genre-style archetypes are clearly traced: Russian revolutionary song, Orthodox tradition and Western European spiritual music. This global approach to synthesis was made possible by the use of polyphony at all levels of composition: from technical to conceptual.

In the choral texture of the cycle, the melodic principle of the connection of voices became the most important, which led to an increased role of non-limiting forms of polyphony. In individual poems (or any sections of the form) focused on the Orthodox tradition (meaning parts: No. 2 "One of many", No. 3 "Outside", No. 7 "The belated volleys stopped", No. 8 "They won", No. 9 "May Song), a sub-vocal is used polyphony, coming from the synthesis of the intonation relief of the Russian revolutionary song and the ornate peasant folk melos. The voices in the choral texture sometimes converge in unison, then form a dense polyphonic fabric (due to divisi in choral parts). In some cases, the principle of "concertina" arises (G. Grigorieva's term) [4, p. 20], where the solo choral part and the rest of the voices are correlated in the general sound.

The function of the bourdon, characteristic of folk singing, is performed by sustained sounds in individual voices of a mixed choir. So, in the central episode No. 6 "The Ninth of January", the pure fifth (d-a), which arises vertically between the bass and tenor parts, is the foundation for the lamentation in the viola part (in the words "Goy you, our king father!", c. 42). In No. 7, "Belated volleys have ceased", the mournful epitaph "with honor to the fallen brothers" sounds against the background of the bourdon fifth (gis-dis).

The techniques of imitation polyphony are found in the poems: No. 4 "At a meeting during the shipment", No. 5 "Executed", No. 6 "The Ninth of January". So in No. 5 "Executed" there is a four-voice fugato with a quarto-quinte ascending disposition of theme-response passages. The theme itself, written in a natural minor with the variability of the modal foundations, and the subsequent unrestrained counter-composition are associated in this case with folk song polyphony.

A similar enrichment of Western European imitation technique with Russian melodic intonations is found in No. 4 "At a meeting during shipment":

· accurate imitation, in which, from the point of view of the ratio of vocalization and singing with the text, the usual order of development is violated. Usually in choral music, the musical theme is initially presented with words, and imitations either repeat individual words or phrases, or sound vocalized. Here, the propost sounds like vocalization in a textured "background" (in the bass and soprano parts), and only then, as a rispost, a theme with words arises (in the tenor part). This technique can be compared with the motto technique in early Renaissance writings. The appearance of the cantus firmus or cantus floridus in the tenor was preceded by their separate intonations in other voices of the texture.

· simultaneous sounding of ascending and descending three—tone intonation in octave duplications: basses, alto baritones, sopranos (one bar to c.29);

· imitation of a micromotiv (descending trichord) in different rhythmic patterns: basses and sopranos — like a theme in magnification (half with a dot, quarter with a dot), tenor — eighth (c.32).

In the climax of the poem "The Ninth of January", D. Shostakovich uses contrasting polyphony (polyphony of layers) – the chord structure of the presentation of male voices is contrasted with imitations in the soprano and alto parts.

An interesting example of combining quasi-canonical technique with the verse—variation principle is found in the final issue of "Song" (c. 96 - c. 104). Initially, the theme is presented in female voices ("Fly our song") like Kant: the sopranos and the first violas move in parallel thirds, they are rhythmically contrasted by the part of the second violas. The introduction of the tenors in combination with the soprano part gives the effect of a proportional canon due to their intonation commonality (trichord h-c-d) and rhythmic discrepancy (movement of eighths and quarters in the upper voice and quarters and halves in tenors).

The form described above is only the "theme" of the verse-variation cycle (four verses). While preserving the "canonical" exposition, D. Shostakovich uses a vertically moving counterpoint (in the third and fourth verses, the "theme in magnification" is entrusted to the violas and sopranos). In derivative compounds, due to the complex tonal plan (Ges-dur, es-moll, G-dur, H-dur, Ges-dur), rather tart consonances are formed, composed in a stream of constant motion[1].

The premiere of "Ten Poems" took place on October 10, 1951. In the crowded Great Hall of the Moscow Conservatory, they were performed by the State Choir of Russian Song and the Boys Choir of the Moscow Choral School under the direction of the outstanding choirmaster A.V. Sveshnikov. He received the score at the end of March, but it took a long time to learn it. According to the memoirs of A. Sveshnikov, the forty-minute work was done brilliantly, but intonation is very difficult, it had to be learned not to sing, but to pronounce. At the rehearsal of the choir "The Ninth of January", the delicate D. Shostakovich, stopping the choir at the words "Bare your heads!", asked: "Shout them out! Scream your heart out!" [5]. This poem became the center of the concert: it was then often sung separately, as a dramatic scene. The premiere was a real great success, D. Shostakovich's choral poems quickly became repertory, gained popularity among listeners, and in 1952 "Ten Poems" were awarded the Stalin Prize. After the death of A. Sveshnikov, the cycle was practically forgotten. The revival of the "Ten Poems" based on the words of revolutionary poets of the late XIX and early XX centuries performed by the Chamber Choir of the Moscow Conservatory conducted by Boris Tevlin in 1999 and recorded on CD in 2005 is evidence of the viability of this page of D. Shostakovich's work.

After "Ten poems based on the words of revolutionary poets of the late XIX and early XX centuries for unaccompanied mixed choir", the composer turned to the a cappella choir twice more. In the fifties, D. Shostakovich showed the most complete interest in folklore. In 1950, while working on the music for the film "Belinsky", the composer studied a collection of songs recorded by F. Rubtsov and created choirs close to folk songs. In 1951, ten arrangements of Russian folk songs for choir and piano were written, and in 1957, two more arrangements. There are also arrangements of fourteen Russian folk songs created by Shostakovich for flute and piano; the autograph is kept in the Central Library (f. 2048, op. 2, unit ch. 23; without the opus number, the time of writing is unknown). The continued interest in song folklore is evidenced by the fact that in 1959, the composer, having familiarized himself with the collection of Russian folk songs, V. Odoevsky, selected 50 songs for processing (the idea was not realized).

In 1957, he created "Two arrangements of Russian folk songs for Unaccompanied choir" (Op. 104), which included "Venuli Winds" and "How to Make Me Younger". The treatments used songs recorded in the Novgorod and Kuibyshev regions. Transcripts of these tunes will be published later: "Venuli winds" — in the collection "Russian folk songs of the Volga region" (Moscow, 1959, No. 95); "How I am younger" — in the collection "Traditional Folklore of the Novgorod region" (L., 1979, No. 168). The work was first performed on November 24, 1957 in Moscow in the Great Hall of the Conservatory by the USSR State Academic Russian Choir.

"Venuli winds" is a long‑drawn song of the northern Pomors, part of the circle of ritual songs performed during the pre-wedding week. The pre—wedding week is a period especially richly saturated with wedding song lyrics and various small (often mismatched in different areas) ceremonial and household details performed due to local traditions. One of the details noted during the pre-wedding week in almost all areas of old Russia were the bride's parties, where young people gathered and where special lyrical "wedding" choruses were performed, very often improvisational in nature and had no options in other areas.

The lyrical wedding song (as opposed to the preacher) was always performed by the choir. There are no solo songs in the traditional Russian wedding ceremony. A lyrical wedding song is a broad, polyphonic and generalizing reflection of the ceremony in its main thematic refractions. The poetic speech of the song flows smoothly and contains separate plot motifs and situations. The intonation of the song is calm, the style of presentation is objective, logical and based on descriptive and narrative elements.

Working with the musical and textual primary source, D. Shostakovich sought to preserve its original appearance as much as possible in terms of pitch and structure. With the free and wide development of the melody, the verbal text strictly regulates the musical phrase. The rhythmic structure of the wedding song is also quite clear. The choral performance surrounds the main melody with undertones and creates a rich, elegant festive sound. Since the origins of the ritual song are an incantation formula, the lines of the wedding song are often repeated twice, as if for greater persuasiveness and strength of the "spell".

In this treatment, D. Shostakovich emphasized the high culture of polyphonic singing of the Russian people, its dominant principle ‑ all voices sing a version of one melody. The melody develops simultaneously with the verse and interacts closely with it.

"As I am younger, younger" is a non-ceremonial, frequent song (without chanting, tongue twister). Those motifs that make the characters sad in a long song, and in a ballad make up a dramatic plot, are interpreted in a frequent song as a joke (discord between husband and wife, etc.).

In this treatment of a Russian folk song, the composer tends to the Glinkin type of textured variations on an unchanging melody. In a couplet-variation form (eight couplets), in which the theme is presented repeatedly with changes in texture, harmony, the ratio of contrapuntal voices, timbre (instrumentation). The methods of metrorhythmic variation of contrapuntal voices (emphasizing strong lobes, syncopation) are most actively shown.

The arrangements of folk songs keep the melody and harmonization unchanged. In the choral texture of both treatments, D. Shostakovich demonstrated the artistic potential of sub-vocality and variation, so characteristic of Russian songwriting.

Russian Russian folk song, the life-giving juices of which nourish the Russian professional musical culture, is characterized by the richness and variety of natural modes, which provide inexhaustible opportunities for the creative imagination of the composer, allow him to find new and new harmonic means within the limits of ladotonal thinking" [21, p. 3]. Shostakovich emphasized the importance of folk art for the development of Russian music: "Russian folk song, the life-giving juices of which nourish the Russian professional musical culture, is characterized by the richness and variety of natural modes, which give inexhaustible opportunities for the creative imagination of the composer, allow him to find new and new harmonic means within the limits of ladotonal thinking" [21, p. 3].

In 1970, on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the birth of V.I. Lenin (completed on February 13, 1970 in Repin, in the House of Composers' Creativity), eight ballads were written to the words of E. Dolmatovsky for the unaccompanied male choir "Fidelity" (Op. 136). In many ways, this cycle inherits the principles of the "Ten Poems": intonation nature, polyphonization of chord tissue. However, compared to the poems, the ballads are less symphonized, and the suite principle is more refracted in them. The role of polyphony is also modest: separate imitations are used, there is no complex counterpoint and contrasting polyphony.

It is noteworthy that the tenor part is set out not in the usual treble key for a modern musician, but in a tenor key [20] – symbolically emphasizing the connection of times, the constant of timeless, universal values. In April 1970, the composer wrote about the cycle of ballads to the poet E. Dolmatovsky: "Fidelity has been defended by me. I am happy and proud to have written such an essay" [21, p. 8]. The premiere performance of the ballads took place in Tallinn (concert hall "Estonia") by the Men's Choir of the Estonian SSR under the direction of G. Ernesaks.

Summing up, we emphasize that a characteristic feature of Russian music of the second half of the twentieth century was the basing of linear melodic forms on individual intonation compositional systems. In this perspective, D. Shostakovich's a cappella choral legacy occupies a special position. The artistic consciousness of the composer is universal. A deep synthesis of the secular and the spiritual takes place in him. This position has become a determining factor for polyphony as the dominant principle of the composer's musical thinking. Polyphony became "the basis of the internal processes of symphonism and drama, linking contrasting and conflicting elements into a single whole, creating the artistic appearance of the composition" [8, p. 168].

The global impact of polyphony on the system of musical means, which is noted by all researchers in D. Shostakovich, is a general trend of the time. N. Gerasimova‑Persian, in particular, writes: "Finally, we can talk about polyphony of a "higher order" ("metapolyphony"), about the counterpoint of two spheres: so to speak, the "outer" is the sphere of action, and the "inner" is the sphere of thought." [3, pp. 262-263].

The study of D. Shostakovich's individual polyphonic style, which arose on the basis of a peculiar correlation of traditional and innovative expressive means and techniques, seems very promising. Here, the connection with the polyphony of the Russian drawl song, with the legacy of the principles of "baroque" polyphony, as well as the use of contrasting polyphony (in particular, the polyphony of layers) acquires special importance as a continuity of the traditions of Russian composers of the XIX century, first of all – M. Mussorgsky.

It is difficult to overestimate the importance of D. Shostakovich's musical heritage. It is the most important milestone in the development of Russian art of the twentieth century. D. Shostakovich's work has formed a new canon of "modern academic music" in the post-Soviet space. The scale of D. Shostakovich's personality determines the idea that any composition by the master of Russian music is so multifaceted that it is undoubtedly promising in scientific and practical terms. This fully applies to compositions for the a cappella choir.

References
1. Akopyan, L.O. (2004). Dmitry Shostakovich: experience in the phenomenology of creativity: monograph. St. Petersburg: Dmitry Bulanin. 473.
2. Aranovsky, M.G. (1979). Symphonic quests: The problem of the symphony genre in Soviet music 1960–1975: Research essays. Leningrad: Soviet composer. Leningrad department. 287.
3. Gerasimova-Persidskaya, N.A. (1985). Polyphonic thinking of Shostakovich in the cultural and historical aspect. Materials of the International Symposium dedicated to Dmitry Shostakovich. Cologne, 262 268.
4. Grigorieva, G.V. (1991). Russian choral music of the 70–80s. Moscow. 80.
5. Ten poems based on the words of revolutionary poets of the late 19th and early 20th centuries for unaccompanied mixed choir, op. 88 (1951). Chamber choir of the Moscow Conservatory. Artistic director and conductor – Boris Tevlin. (2006). Annotation. Moscow: Tonstudio FSUE «Kinoconcern Mosfilm».
6. Dolzhansk, A.N. (1970). 24 preludes and fugues by D. Shostakovich. Leningrad: Soviet composer. 258.
7. Kuznetsov, I.K. (2012). Polyphony in Russian music of the twentieth century. Issue 1. Moscow.: Publishing house «DEKA-VS». 421.
8. Kuznetsov, I.K. (2012). Polyphony of D. Shostakovich. Polyphony in Russian music of the twentieth century. Issue 1. Moscow: Publishing house «DEKA-VS». 130 168.
9. Meyer, K. (2019). Shostakovich: Life. Creation. Time. AST. 576.
10. Mikheeva, L.V. (1997). The Life of Dmitry Shostakovich. Moscow: Terra. 366.
11. Muller, T.F. (1989). Polyphony: a textbook for musicology departments of music universities. Moscow: Music. 333.
12. Protopopo, V.V. (1983). On the principles of formation in Shostakovich. Protopopov V. Selected studies and articles. Ñomp. N. Sokolov. Moscow: Soviet Composer, 75-98.
13. Simakova, N.A. (2002). Strict style counterpoint and fugue. History, theory, practice. Part 1. Counterpoint of strict style as an artistic tradition and academic discipline. Moscow: Publishing House «Composer». 528.
14. Simakova, N.A. (2007). Strict style counterpoint and fugue. History, theory, practice. Part 2. Fugue: its logic and poetics. Moscow: Publishing House «Composer». 800.
15. Skrebkov, S.S. (2023). Analysis of musical works: a textbook for secondary vocational education. 2nd ed., rev. and additional. Moscow: Yurayt Publishing House. 302.
16. Theory of modern composition: textbook (2005). resp. ed. V.S. Tsenova. Moscow: Music. 616.
17. Fraenov, V.P. (2000). Textbook of polyphony: student for students of theoretical departments of music schools. Moscow: Music. 205.
18. Khentova, S.M. (1996). Shostakovich: life and work. In 2 volumes, 2nd ed. Moscow: Composer. 544.
19. Kholopov, Yu.N. (1997). Shostakovich's modes: structure and semantics. Dedicated to Shostakovich. Sat. articles for the 90th anniversary of the composer (1906-1966). Moscow, 433-460.
20. Chesnokov, P.G. (2023). Choir and its management: (original edition). Scientific edition of the text, introductory article and comments by N.Yu. Plotnikova. Moscow: Foundation for the Development of Orthodox Musical Culture «Life-Giving Source». 420.
21. Shostakovich, D.D. Collected works [in 42 volumes]. Volume. 34. Works for choir without accompaniment and with piano accompaniment. Moscow: Music. 232

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the research in the article submitted for publication in the journal Culture and Art, as the author indicated in the title ("Polyphony in D. Shostakovich's a cappella choral work"), is polyphony, considered by the author as a warehouse (method of organization) of polyphony (in the object) in D. Shostakovich's a cappella choral work. The author clarified the corpus of a cappella choral works in the works of D. Shostakovich, defining the boundaries of the object of research, briefly revealed the degree of study of polyphony in the composer's total creative heritage, highlighting a cappella choral works as a poorly studied area of application of polyphonic techniques by the composer. The scarcity of completed opuses for a cappella choir in the legacy of D. Shostakovich ("Ten poems on the words of revolutionary poets of the late XIX and early XX centuries for unaccompanied mixed choir", Op. 88 (1951), Two arrangements of Russian folk songs, for unaccompanied choir, Op. 104 (1957) and "Fidelity", eight ballads to the words of E. Dolmatovsky for unaccompanied male choir, Op. 136 (1970)) it allowed the author to briefly highlight the entire designated object of attention. Although the small volume of the scientific article made it necessary to focus the author's attention only on the most significant stylistic features of D. Shostakovich's polyphonic writing, which does not fully correspond to the set (broadly formulated) goal ("to determine the stylistic features of D. Shostakovich's polyphonic writing" in works for unaccompanied choir). The reviewer notes that the article as a whole well problematizes the need to study D. Shostakovich's polyphonic style on the example of his works for unaccompanied choir, as evidenced by the author's final conclusion ("The study of D. Shostakovich's individual polyphonic style, which arose on the basis of a peculiar ratio of traditional and innovative expressive means and techniques, seems very promising"). The author pointed out three main sources of the basic techniques of the composer's polyphonic style ("the connection with the polyphony of the Russian drawl song, with the legacy of the principles of "baroque" polyphony, as well as the use of contrasting polyphony (in particular, the polyphony of layers) acquires special importance as a continuity of the traditions of Russian composers of the XIX century, primarily M. Mussorgsky"), noted the stylistic allusions of Shostakovich with the polyphonic thinking of M. I. Glinka and M. P. Mussorgsky, identified the key stylistic feature of the composer, expressed in basing linear melodic forms on an individual intonation system. Therefore, the reviewer recommends narrowing the research goal indicated by the author to the scale of the achieved result (for example, to identify the problem of studying the stylistic features of D. Shostakovich's polyphonic writing in works for unaccompanied choir), since it has not been achieved in the currently formulated version and continues to require deeper immersion of research attention into the material. Such a goal can be achieved solely by summarizing a complex set of empirical research material, rather than using a brief review of it, and is worthy, by and large, of a monograph, rather than a short scientific article. Thus, the subject of the study is considered at a theoretical level sufficient for publication in a scientific journal, although the high goal stated by the author has not been achieved and requires specification. The research methodology, as the author pointed out with reference to the work of P. G. Chesnokov, "is based on the interaction of two fields of musical science: musicology and choral studies," which, according to the author, "required the study of theoretical works on various issues of polyphony: T. Muller [11], V. Fraenov [17], S. Skrebkov [15], N. Simakova [13, 14], I. Kuznetsova [7, 16]"). The reviewer notes that musicology includes such a specific practice-oriented field as choral studies, therefore their equal "interaction" is a theoretical oxymoron. Pavel Grigoryevich Chesnokov, a famous Russian composer, author of widely performed spiritual compositions, speaking about the interaction of two fields of musical science, meant the relationship between theory and practice. This methodological principle is not implemented in the presented article. Therefore, its mention is redundant and does not relate to the implementation of the program of this particular study. In fact, the author implements the widely used principle of synthesis of techniques of historical-biographical and musical-stylistic analysis, which is characteristic of a comprehensive musicological approach (T. Muller, S. Skrebkov, L. Mazel, etc.). Thus, if the techniques of musical-stylistic analysis of empirical material are well-founded by the author with a list of researchers of polyphony, then a reference to the principles of subordination The musical theory of P. G. Chesnokov's practical problems of choral studies looks formal, thoughtless and accidental. The reviewer recommends that the author explain the methodological basis of his research to the reader more precisely. The author explains the relevance of the chosen topic by the fact that the stylistic features of D. Shostakovich's polyphonic writing in works for unaccompanied choir in comparison with studies of polyphony in other genres of the composer's work are poorly represented in scientific discourse. Having a certain special outlook, it is indeed possible to agree with the author's thesis, although it is poorly reasoned within the framework of assessing the degree of study of the chosen topic. The scientific novelty, which consists in a brief analysis of the author's empirical material and generalizing conclusions, deserves theoretical attention. The style of the text is generally scientific, only in one statement the reviewer found an accidental repetition of words ("... original artistic solutions based on the basis of the arisen ..."). The structure of the article reveals the logic of presenting the results of scientific research. The bibliography sufficiently reveals the problematic field of research, but the design of the description needs a little proofreading according to GOST. The appeal to the opponents is correct, although it is exclusively complementary (non-controversial) in nature. The article is of interest to the readership of the journal "Culture and Art", but needs a little revision, taking into account the comments of the reviewer.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

The subject of the research in the presented article is polyphony in D. Shostakovich's a cappella choral work. The descriptive method, the historical method, the method of categorization, the method of analysis, the method of comparison, as well as the method of synthesis of "techniques of historical-biographical and musical-stylistic analysis" were used as the methodology of the subject area of research in this article. The relevance of the article is beyond doubt, since Russian musical creativity of the second half of the twentieth century demonstrates a huge range of different artistic trends and musical styles, which is most clearly manifested in the work of composers. It was during this period that Russian composers and performers showed the greatest interest in polyphony, and in choral music a cappella polyphony finds its manifestation at almost all compositional levels, and polyphony in choral music a cappella in the works of D. Shostakovich is insufficiently studied at present. The scientific novelty of the research lies in the detailed description and analysis of polyphony in D. Shostakovich's a cappella choral work and the author's interpretation of D. Shostakovich's choral heritage. The article is written in the language of scientific style with the competent use in the text of the study of the presentation of various positions of authoritative scientists to the problem under study and the application of scientific terminology and definitions characterizing the subject of research. The structure is designed taking into account the basic requirements for writing scientific articles, in the structure of this study such elements as the introductory part, the main part, the final part and the bibliography can be distinguished. The content of the article reflects its structure. Particularly valuable in the content of the study is the analysis and author's interpretation of D. Shostakovich's choral heritage, as well as the definition of "stylistic features of D. Shostakovich's polyphonic writing in works for unaccompanied choir." The bibliography contains 21 sources, including mainly non-periodical domestic publications. The article describes various positions and points of view of famous scientists on the work of D. Shostakovich and the understanding of polyphony in a cappella choral music, and also contains an appeal to well-known authoritative works and sources devoted to this topic. The presented study contains conclusions concerning the subject area of the study. In particular, it is noted that "the importance of D. Shostakovich's musical heritage cannot be overestimated. It is the most important milestone in the development of Russian art of the twentieth century. D. Shostakovich's work has formed a new canon of "modern academic music" in the post-Soviet space. The scale of D. Shostakovich's personality determines the idea that any composition by the master of Russian music is so multifaceted that it is undoubtedly promising in scientific and practical terms. This fully applies to compositions for the a cappella choir." The materials of this study are intended for a wide range of readers, they can be interesting and used by scientists for scientific purposes, teaching staff in the educational process, workers in the field of art and musical organizations, heads of choirs and musicology experts. As disadvantages of this study, it should be noted that it might be advisable to mark the term "a cappella" in the title and text of the article with quotation marks, since it is used in a foreign language. The article did not clearly define and highlight its structural elements with appropriate headings, such as introduction, relevance, research methodology, research results and discussion of results, conclusion, although they are undoubtedly traced in its content, however, they are not separately indicated by headings. When writing an article, it might be worth paying more attention to periodicals, as well as foreign sources, refer to them and include them in the bibliographic list. These shortcomings do not reduce the high scientific significance of the study itself, but rather relate to the design of the text of the article. It is recommended to publish the article.