Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Yakovlev V.A. To the new outlook of the question on dialectics

Abstract: The subject of this research is the understanding of dialectics as a universality of the critical interpretational rationalism. The main stages of the establishment of a new dialectical method in the history of philosophy are being examined. Special attention is given to the Hegelian and the Marxist theories of dialectics. The author determines the essential cluster of the elements (core) of dialectics, which remains throughout the entire history of its development. The scientific novelty consists in the following statement: the linear dialectics of the XIX century is currently opposed to the nonlinear dialectics, the essence of which lies in the hermeneutic movement for the purpose of resolution of the contradictions between the part and the whole, private and public, secondary and primary. The object is being viewed alternately in different contexts, and the mind sort of executes a “shuttle” movement from the object to one “horizon”, from the latter to another “horizon”, and then back to the object.  Unlike the linear scheme (thesis – antithesis – synthesis), the new understanding of dialectics first and foremost consists in the ability to fit an object into various, and most often opposite (contrary), conceptual contexts, which confront each other as binary oppositions.


Keywords:

contradiction, rationalism, hermeneutic, semantic contexts, oppositions, binarity, dialectics, method, laws, culture


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Evolutionary epistemology, rationality and the sociology of knowledge / Ed. by Radnitsky 0., Bartley W.W. III.-La Salle (III.)j Open court, 1988.-XIV, 475 p.
2. Interv'yu s akademikom V.L. Ginzburgom / METAFIZIKA. VEK XXI. AL''MANAKh. VYP. 3. Nauka, filosofiya, religiya. 2010. S. 26
3. Grekhem L.R. Estestvoznanie, filosofiya i nauki o chelovecheskom povedenii v Sovetskom Soyuze. Per. s angl. — M.: Politizdat, 1991. S. 9-56.
4. PetukhovS.V. Geneticheskii kod i proektsionnye operatory matrichnogo genotipa / Metafizika, 2014, ¹ 1 (11). C. 54.
5. Chaikovskii Yu.V. Nevostrebovannyi sintez. Ob evolyutsionnykh vzglyadakh K. Poppera // Voprosy filosofii. 1995. ¹ 12. S. 50—54.
6. Popper K. Darvinizm kak metafizicheskaya issledovatel'skaya programma. // Voprosy filosofii. 1995. ¹ 12. S. 39—49.
7. Gegel' G.V.F. Raboty razlichnykh let: V 2 t. T.2, M., 1970. S. 541.
8. Gegel' G.V.F. Soch. M., 1929. T. l. C. 133.
9. Sm.: Edinstvo nauchnogo znaniya. M., 1988. S. 280-285.
10. Popper K. Chto takoe dialektika? // Voprosy filosofii. 1995. ¹ 1. S. 118-138.
11. Il'enkov E.V. Dialektika i germenevtika // Sovremennye zarubezhnye kontseptsii dialektiki. Kriticheskie ocherki. M.: 1987. S. 133-163.
12. Vazyulin V. A. Logika «Kapitala» K. Marksa M. 1968. S. 33-78.
13. Il'enkov E. V., Dialektika abstraktnogo i konkretnogo v «Kapitale» Marksa. M. 1960. S. 34-89.
14. Materializm i empiriokrititsizm v Rossii i za rubezhom. Novye materialy. M., 1990. S. 7-68.
15. Kedrov B.M. K izucheniyu knigi V.I.Lenina «Materializm i empiriokrititsizm». M., 1973. S. 85-167.
16. Makarov A.D. O proizvedenii Fridrikha Engel'sa «Anti-Dyuring M., 1951. S. 7-49.
17. Kedrov B.M. O «Dialektike prirody» Engel'sa. M., 1973. S. 81-112.
18. Suvorov L.N., Voprosy dialektiki v «Filosofskikh tetradyakh» V.I. Lenina. M., 1960. S. 35-78.
19. Sm: st. Dialektika / Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya. 1983. S. 158.
20. Yakovlev V.A. Informatsionnaya programma novoi epistemologii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. — 2015.-¹ 10.-S.1460-1470.
21. Yakovlev V. A. Informatsionnoe edinstvo bytiya: soznanie, zhizn', materiya // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. — 2013.-¹ 10.-S.1-57
22. Oizerman T.I. Dialekticheskii materializm / Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya v 4 t. / In-t filosofii Rossiiskoi akad. nauk; Gl. red. V. S. Stepin. — 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. — M.: Mysl', 2010. T. 1. S. 657.
23. Lenin V.I. Materializm i empiriokrititsizm. Poln. sobr. soch., t. 18. S. 131.
24. Marks K., Engel's F. Soch., t. 23. S. 22.
25. Lenin V.I. K voprosu o dialektike. Poln. sobr. soch., t. 29. S. 316 – 322.
26. Sovremennye teorii poznaniya. M.,INION RAN, 1992. S. 9-87.
27. Evolyutsionnaya epistemologiya: problemy, perspektivy. M., 1996. S. 7-15.
28. Merkulov I.P. Kognitivnaya evolyutsiya. M., 1998. S.10-45.
29. Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov SP. Intuitsiya kak samodostraivanie // Voprosy filosofii. 1994. ¹ 2. S. 112.
30. Sartr Zh.P. Problema metoda. M. 1994. S. 22-43.
31. Riker P. Konflikt interpretatsii. M., 1995. S. 54-77.
32. Gadamer Kh.-G. Istina i metod. M., 1988. S. 351.
33. Menskii M.B. Intuitsiya i kvantovyi podkhod k teorii soznaniya. / Voprosy filosofii. 2015. ¹ 4. S. 64-74.