Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:
Belokrylova E.A.
On the Role and Significance of the Methodology of
Comparative Law in the Implementation of
Modern Ecological and Legal Research
// Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law.
2015. ¹ 1.
P. 83-88.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=66691
Belokrylova E.A. On the Role and Significance of the Methodology of
Comparative Law in the Implementation of
Modern Ecological and Legal Research
Abstract:
In the present article the author reveals the high academic value of the method of comparative law, as well
as the necessity of its application in the study of a wide range of environmental relations. The main emphasis is on the
methodological aspects of comparative legal analysis not only as a private-scientific method, but also as a science. The
works of leading domestic and foreign legal scholars who have made a significant contribution to the development
of modern comparative law are analyzed. Well-founded conclusions about the need for comparative legal model for
the study of modern environmental law as the youngest and fastest growing industries in the Russian law are made.
The basic performance levels of comparative law – international and national are studied. Macro and micro levels of
practice-application usage patterns of comparative studies in the field of modern environmental law and legislation
are pointed out.The need to examine the environmental and natural resource foreign law and legislation, which is intended to both cognitive
and empirical components is underlined. Certain techniques of organizing and conducting of comparative legal studies
are offered. Formed on the large-scale academic pursuits modern comparative paradigm allows us to conclude that
the current comparative law is a fundamental basis for a wide range of ecological and legal studies lying in different planes
of legal knowledge, a broad cross-sectoral nature of which is confirmed by the study of the characteristics of individual
legal families, systems and branches of law, as well as their institutions.
Keywords:
comparative law, methodology, techniques, private scientific methods, environmental law, environmental legislation, comparative studies, scientific trends, ecological and legal science, scientific paradigm, a comparative legal method.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here
.
References
1. Lafitskiy V.I. Universal'nye zakony razvitiya prava // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2014. ¹ 5. S. 827–831.
2. Lafitskiy V.I. Urovni sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. – 2009. – ¹ 1. – S. 94-107.
3. Marchenko M.N. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie: uchebnik-2-e izd, pererab. i dop. M.: Prospekt. 2014.
4. Rabel' E. Zadachi i neobkhodimost' sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. Perevod s nemetskogo pod nauchnoy redaktsiey d.yu.n., prof. B.M. Gongalo. Ekaterinburg: Rossiyskaya shkola chastnogo prava (Ural'skoe ob'edinenie). 2000.
5. Saidov A.Kh. Sravnitel'noe grazhdanskoe pravo: kak nauka i uchebnaya distsiplina // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonoda-tel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. Pervyy vypusk (¹8). 2007.
6. Saidov A.Kh. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie (osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti): Uch-k / Otv. red. V.A. Tuma-nov . 2-e izd., dop. i pererab. M.: Yurist. 2009.
7. Saidov A.Kh. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie i zakonotvorchestvo // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i pravo-vedeniya. 2006. ¹1.
8. Saidov A.Kh. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie i zakonotvorchestvo // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravni-tel'nogo pravovedeniya. – 2006. – ¹ 1. – S. 16-22.
9. Tikhomirov Yu.A. Dinamika pravovykh sistem v usloviyakh intergratsii gosudarstv // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonoda-tel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2014. ¹ 4. S. 706–713.
10. Tikhomirov Yu.A. Kurs sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. M.: Izdatel'stvo NORMA. 1996.
11. Khalabudenko O.A. Voprosy metodologii sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya: ot funktsionalizma k konstruktsii i de-konstruktsii // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2013. ¹ 4. S, 653–663.
12. Tsvaygert K., Ketts Kh. Vvedenie v sravnitel'noe pravovedenie v sfere chastnogo prava. V 2-kh tomakh. Tom I. Osnovy: Per. s nem. M.: Mezhdunar. otnosheniya. 2000.
13. Ancel M. Utilité et méthodes du droit comparé. Neuchâtel. Ed́ itions Ides et Calendes. 1971.
14. Bogdan M. Concise Introduction to Comparative Law. Groningen : Europa Law Publishing. 2013.
15. De Cruz, Peter. Comparative Law in a Changing World. London-New York: Routledge-Cavendish Publishing. 2010.
16. Ebert K. H. Rechtsvergleichung. Einfùhrung in die Grundlagen. Bern, 1978.
17. Ekaterna A. Belokrylova. The Legal Problems of Nanotechnology Environmental Safety Provision in the Russian Federation: The Foreign Country’s Experience: Nanotechnology Law&Business, Volume 8 (3) // Full text: http://www.nanolabweb. com/index.cfm/action/main.default.viewArticle/articleID/370/CFID/5288619/CFTOKEN/82435659/index.html (data ob-rashcheniya 03.12.2014).
18. Hug Walter. The History of Comparative Law. Harvard Law Review Assoc., 1932 // Full text: http://www.sp.units.it/ Docenti%20Materiali/SCARCIGLIA/HUG,%20history%20of%20comparative%20law.pdf (data obrashcheniya 03.12.2014).
19. Kamba W. Comparative law: A theoretical framework // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1974. Vol. 23(3).
20. Rheinstein M. Comparative Law – it’s function, methods and usage // Arkansas Law Review & Bar Association Journal. Vol. 22. 1968.
21. Ruiter D. W. Legal Institutions. (Law and Philosophy Library). Spingler. 2001.
22. Stone F. The end to be served by comparative law // Tulane Law Review. 1951. Vol. 25.
23. Zweigert K., Kötz H. An Introduction to Comparative Law: The framework. North-Holland Publishing Company. 1977
| 
Eng
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
