Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Taxes and Taxation
Reference:

Frumina, S. V., Zhuravleva, T. A. Experience of Foreign States in Funding Scientific Research and Development

Abstract: The subject under research is the innovation activity of foreign states. The focus is made on the experience of foreign states in financial incitement of research and development including incitement of research and development by the means of taxation mechanisms. The analysis of application of tax incentives is carried out particularly for developed countries and developing countries. Particular attention is paid to the experience of the USA as a leader in the development of innovation activity. The USA experience demonstrates positive tendencies in innovation incitement and can be successfully implemented in the Russian economy. The research methodology includes the comparative analysis and logical interpretation of analysis data in a form of generalizations. The main results of the research are the following: description of peculiarities of the innovation activity funding in foreign states; conclusion that tax incentives of scientific research and development have their own peculiarities that do not depend on the level of the development of innovation-based economy; the authors show that each country implements their own set of rebates and preferences and the combination of the rebates and preferences used depends both on goals and targets of the incitement and a great number of factors and limitations.


Keywords:

research and developments, financial, expenses, federal expenditures, tax incentives, tax rebates, tax preferences, innovation activity, innovation-based economy, experience of foreign states.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. The President’s Plan for Science and Innovation. W., 2010.
2. Science, technology and innovation in Europe, 2013 edition.-European Union, 2013.
3. Schumpeter J. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical.
4. OECD. Main Science&Technological Indicators. 2010, September.
5. OECD estimates based on Research and Development Database, August 2011. Office of Science and Technology Policy. Executive Office of the President. 2010, Febr.
6. Investing in the Building Blocks of American Innovation. Federal R&D, Technology, and STEM Education in the 2011 Budget. W., Executive Office of the President.
7. Frolov I.E Innovatsii kak protsess dvizheniya kapitala i klyuchevoy faktor modernizatsii ekonomiki Rossii // Finansy i kredit. – 2013.-¹7 (535).
8. Analysis of the capitalist Process. N. Y.; L., 1939. 2 vols.
9. D. Guellec, B. Van Pottelsberghe. R&D and Productivity Growth: Panel Data Analysis of 16 OECD countries//OECD Economic Studies, No 33/II, 2001.
10. Markov V.V. Nalogovye l'goty kak sposob stimulirovaniya innovatsionnoy deyatel'nosti: otsenka tselesoobraznosti i byudzhetnoy rezul'tativnosti ikh primeneniya. Sankt-Peterburg, 2010 .
11. Gosudarstvo i biznes: strategiya vzaimodeystviya v ekonomike XXI v. (opyt SShA) / Otv. red. L.F. Lebedeva. M.: ISKRAN, 2012.
12. Ovcharov A.O. Raskhody na NIOKR kak indikator ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2014. - 3. - C. 432 - 437. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.3.11467.