Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Panokin, A.M. Limited inquiry

Abstract: The article contains analysis of the topical issues of the novel institution of criminal procedural law: limited inquiry. The author analyzes the correlations the periods for examination of the information on the committed crime in limited inquiry, general inquiry and preliminary investigation. The author also studies the changes in the legal regulation of the types of preliminary investigation in 2002-2013. The article contains evaluation of grounds and procedures for the limited inquiry as well as the circumstances precluding application of this type of inquiry. The author studies specific features of the information (claim) of a crime, and evaluation of the plea of the suspect for limited inquiry. Much attention is paid to the specific features of proof in limited inquiry and judicial proceedings in a criminal case, when the inquiry was limited. The author makes a conclusion that the norms on limited inquiry are not constitutional, since they do not correspond with the principle of presumption of innocence, do not provide for comprehensive, full and objective investigation of a crime, considerably limit the procedural rights and possibilities of the suspect and his defense, inevitably violating human rights in the process of limited inquiry.


Keywords:

preliminary inquiry, inquiry, preliminary investigation, information of a crime, period for investigation, criminal procedural form, presumption of innocence, participation of defense, specific features of proof, specific features of judicial proceedings.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Abushakhmin B. Nazad, k «tsaritse»//Novaya advokatskaya gazeta. 2013. ¹ 15. S. 12-13.
2. Dolya E. A. Osobennosti dokazyvaniya pri proizvodstve doznaniya v sokrashchennoy forme//Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2013. ¹ 6. S. 43-46.
3. Kal'nitskiy V., Murav'ev K., Voronov D. Kontseptsiya doznaniya v sokrashchennoy forme: dostizheniya i voprosy sovershenstvovaniya//Ugolovnoe pravo. 2013. ¹ 3. S. 81-85.
4. Makhmutov M. V. Zakon o doznanii v sokrashchennoy forme i reforma stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela//Zakonnost'. 2013. ¹ 7. S. 39-43.
5. Panokin A. M. Differentsiatsiya protsessual'noy formy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve//Lex Russica. Nauchnye trudy Moskovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii imeni O. E. Kutafina. 2010. ¹ 3 (may). S. 652-659.