Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Gavrilov, B.Y. Implementation of certain provisions of the Criminal Judicial Proceedings Charter in the modern pre-trial proceedings in Russia

Abstract: The article is devoted to the modern problems in the sphere of criminal procedural legislation and the possibilities for implementation into it of certain provisions of the Charter of Criminal Judicial Proceedings. The immediate object of studies includes the patterns of pre-trial procedure in the process of implementation of specific norms of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation at the stages of initiation of a criminal case and preliminary investigation, including the procedural rules for the initiation of a criminal case, refusal to initiate a criminal case, presentation of the accusation, procedural terms for the investigation, choice of the restraining measures towards the persons hiding from the preliminary investigation bodies, and those on federal wanted list, etc., as well as the propositions of the author on the improvement of criminal procedural legislation on these issues. The methodological basis for the study is substantiated with the dialectic cognition method of studying matters and processes in their mutual relation and connection. Its implementation is guaranteed by a complex of general and specific scientific research methods. The scientific novelty of the work is due to the fact that due to the changes introduced in 2007-2013 into the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the author offers his own analysis of the main procedural institutions, including initiation of the proceedings on a criminal case, presentation of an accusation, guaranteeing reasonability principles in criminal judicial proceedings, differentiation of procedural capability of prosecutor and head of the investigative bodies, etc.


Keywords:

initiation of a criminal case, refusal to initiate a criminal case, presenting an accusation, reasonable period for judicial proceedings, detention, procedural capabilities of the prosecutor, head of the investigative body, head of the inquiry division, limited inquiry, notification on suspicions.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Belkin A.R. UPK PF: nuzhny li peremeny? M.: Izd-vo «Norma», 2013. – 393 s.
2. Berezina L.V. Bykov V.M. Dokazyvanie v stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela po UPK RF. – Kazan', 2006.-256 S.
3. Gavrilov B.Ya. Latentnaya prestupnost': ponyatie, struktura, faktory latentnosti i mery po obespecheniyu dostovernosti ugolovnoy statistiki. Monografiya. M.: Prospekt, 2007. 120 s.
4. Gavrilov B.Ya. Sovremennaya ugolovnaya politika Rossii: tsifry i fakty. Monografiya – M:, 2008.-208 s.
5. Gir'ko S.I. Unifitsirovannoe dosudebnoe proizvodstvo: zerkal'noe otrazhenie vremeni reform. Perspektivy razvitiya ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prava i kriminalistiki (posvyashchaetsya N.V. Radutnoy): materialy 2-y mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (Moskva, 11-12 aprelya 2012 g.). M.: ID «Yurisprudentsiya», 2012. – S.183-187.
6. Gir'ko S.I. Proizvodstvo po ugolovnomu delu doznaniya v sokrashchennoy forme: prognozy i suzhdeniya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2013. ¹21. S. 2-5.
7. Gir'ko S.I. Model' sokrashchennogo dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam // Yuridicheskiy konsul'tant. 2008. ¹1.-S. 3-7.
8. Gulyaev A.P. Kontseptsiya reformirovaniya predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya prestupleniya // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2012. ¹ 11.-S. 2-4.
9. Gulyaev A.P. Tseli, zadachi i printsipy kak fundamental'nye polozheniya ugolovno-protsessual'nogo pava: po zakonu, teorii i praktike // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2012. ¹ 15.-S. 5-8.
10. Kal'nitskiy V.V., Murav'ev K.V. Zakonoproekt o sokrashchennom doznanii kontseptual'no eklektichen // Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Sovershenstvovanie deyatel'nosti pravookhranitel'nykh organov po bor'be s prestupnost'yu v sovremennykh usloviyakh». Vyp. 9. 2-3 noyabrya 2012 g. – S. 292-297.
11. Kovtun N.N. Doznanie v sokrashchennoy forme: kollizii i lakuny normativnogo regulirovaniya // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2013. ¹
12. -S. 47-49. 12. Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Problemy sovremennogo sostoyaniya i puti razvitiya organov predvaritel'nogo sledstviya (k 150-letiyu obrazovaniya v Rossii sledstvennogo apparata), 28-29 maya 2010 g. // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2010. ¹15.-S.2-48.
13. Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Pravovoe i kriminalisticheskoe obespechenie upravleniya organami rassledovaniya prestupleniy», 26 maya 2011 g. // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2011. ¹16. – S. 2-39.
14. Rossiyskoe zakonodatel'stvo Kh-KhKh vekov. T.8. Sudebnaya reforma. – M.: Yurid. lit., 1991. – 496 s.
15. Sementsov V.A. Sokrashchennaya forma rassledovaniya // Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Sovershenstvovanie deyatel'nosti pravookhranitel'nykh organov po bor'be s prestupnost'yu v sovremennykh usloviyakh». 2-3 noyabrya 2012 g. Vyp. 9. – S. 378-380.
16. Materialy kruglogo stola: Pred'yavlenie obvineniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve budet otmeneno? // Yuridicheskiy konsul'tant. 2010. ¹ 3. – S. 9-16.
17. Yanenko E. Razmyshleniya u paradnogo pod'ezda // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2002. ¹ 12.-S. 66-67.