Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Burmagin, S.V. Separation between prosecution and judiciary in the criminal judicial proceedings in Russia: from the judicial reform of 1864 to the current situation

Abstract: The article concerns the history of solutions of the conceptual issue of separating prosecution and judiciary, distinguishing the competences of the criminal investigation bodies and the court starting from the judicial reform of 1864. Special attention is paid to the functional formation of judicial proceedings under the current Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. Special attention is paid to the functional separation of the criminal court from prosecution as a party based on dispositive judicial proceedings according to the current Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. The author notes the causes for the practical deviance of the courts from the dispositive matters, making the court part of accusatory activity. The author provides critical evaluation of the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of July 2, 2013 and legislative initiatives for restoration of the institution for the return of the case for additional investigation, and obliging the court to establish the “objective truth” and fill the gaps in the preliminary investigation. The study is based upon the dialectic, historical, comparative legal and formal legal cognition methods, allowing to uncover the patterns in the transformation of the correlation of competences of the prosecutor and the court in the criminal process. The conclusion is drawn that the separation of prosecutor and judiciary is the reflection of separation of powers in the criminal judicial proceedings. Initiative of the court to return the case to the prosecutor for strengthening the accusation and making the court fill the gaps of preliminary investigation during the trial violate the separation of procedural functions between judiciary and prosecution, causing their competences to mix. The proposed amendments into the Criminal Procedural Law of the Russian Federation contradict to the competitive elements in the criminal judicial proceedings and return it into the framework of the prosecutorial criminal process.


Keywords:

fairness of criminal justice, impartiality of the court, independence of the court, return of the case to the prosecutor, procedural functions, criminal court, prosecutorial power, criminal judicial proceedings, separation of powers, adversarial judicial proceedings.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Trisheva A.A. i Reshetova N.Yu. «Vozrashchenie sudom ugolovnogo dela prokuroru: praktika i novaya pozitsiya KS RF» // Ugolovnyy protsess.-2013.-¹ 11.-S. 10-19.
2. Sudebnye Ustavy 20 noyabrya 1864 goda s izlozheniem rassuzhdeniy, na koikh oni osnovany. Chast' pervaya.-SPb: Izdanie Gosudarstvennoy Kantselyarii, 1866.-690 s.
3. Savitskiy V. M. Ugolovnyy protsess Rossii na novom vitke demokratizatsii // Gosudarstvo i pravo.-1994.-¹ 6.-S. 96-107.
4. Stetsovskiy Yu. I. Sudebnaya vlast' : uchebnoe posobie. M., 1999. 400 s.
5. Rozin N. N. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. Posobie k lektsiyam.-Petrograd: Izdanie Yuridicheskogo knizhnogo sklada «PRAVO», 1916.-598 s.
6. Rossiyskoe zakonodatel'stvo X-XX vv : v 9 t. T.8. Sudebnaya reforma / Pod obshch. red. O. I. Chistyakova.-M.: Yurid. lit., 1991.-496 s.
7. Nikonov M.A. Perekvalifikatsiya in devaforem // Ugolovnyy protsess.-2013.-¹
8. -S. 42-49. 11.Murav'ev K.V. Sud kak organ, ispravlyayushchiy oshibki v primenenii zakona // Ugolovnyy protsess.-2013.-¹ 11.-S. 50-55.
9. Kovtun N.N. Sudy fema // Ugolovnyy protsess.-2013.-¹ 11.
10. Kutafin O. E., Lebedev V. M., Semigin G.Yu. Sudebnaya vlast' v Rossii: istoriya, dokumenty : V 6 t. T. III.-M.: Mysl', 2003.-829 s.
11. Mikhaylovskiy I. V. Osnovnye printsipy organizatsii ugolovnogo suda: Ugolovno-politicheskoe issledovanie.-Tomsk: Parovaya tipo-litografiya P. I. Makushina,1905.-336 s.
12. Kal'nitskiy V.V., Kuryakhova T.V. Sushchestvo i poryadok realizatsii pozitsii Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF po voprosu o vozvrashchenii dela prokuroru dlya usileniya obvineniya-URL : http://www.iuaj.net/node/1409 (data obrashcheniya: 20.01.2014).
13. Dukhovskoy M. V. Russkiy ugolovnyy protsess.-M.: Sklad izdaniya v knizhnom sklade M. V. Klyukina, 1910.-448 s.
14. Dikarev I.S. Ugolovnyy protsess: «tikhaya revolyutsiya» smenilas' reaktsiey // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 5, Yurisprudentsiya.-2013.-¹ 3.-S.98-103.
15. Dzhanshiev G. A. Osnovy sudebnoy reformy (k 25-letiyu novogo suda). Istoriko-yuridicheskie etyudy.-M.: Tipografiya M. P. Shchepkina, 1891.-364 s.
16. Gessen I. V. Sudebnaya reforma.-SPb.: Knigoizdatel'stvo P. P. Gershunina i K°, 1905.-267 s.
17. Aleksandrov A.S., Lapatnikov M.V. Sud na osud, a ne na rossud // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo.-2-13.-¹ 4.-S. 6-12.