
	Actual problems of Russian law Reference: Lyahova, M.A. Legal nature of the contract for the development of the built-up area // Actual problems of Russian law. 2014. № 5. P. 834-841. URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=64888 Lyahova, M.A. Legal nature of the contract for the development of the built-up area Abstract: The article concerns the legal nature and the list of fundamental conditions for the contract for the development of the built-ap areas according to the civil and city-planning legislation The conclusion is made that the contract for the development of the built-up area is an entrepreneurial one by its nature, while at the time of its conclusion and implementation there are public law elements due to the interdisciplinary connections between civil and city-planning branches of law. The entrepreneurial nature of this contract is due to the fact that parties to the contract receive mediated profit: part of the housing constructions may be transferred to the property of public law formation. As for the goals, the contract for the development of the built-up area is a causal one, it has limited application period, and it includes remuneration, since there is a cost for the right to conclude the contract and an obligation to pay the repurchase price. The contract for the development of the built-up area is an investment contract, and its legal nature allows to single out its entrepreneurial character. Keywords: development of a built-up area, construction, fundamental conditions for the contract, development contract, conclusion of a contract, open auction, planning project, developer, registering title to property, administration. This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References 1. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Osobennaya chast': Uchebnik / pod red. L.V. Inogamovoy-Khegay, A.I. Raroga, A.I. Chuchaeva. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: KONTRAKT, INFRA-M, 2009.-800 s. 2. Shvarts M.Z. K voprosu o fal'sifikatsii dokazatel'stv v arbitrazhnom protsesse // Arbitrazhnye spory. 2010. № 3. S. 79-92. 3. Skoblikov P.A. Arbitrazhnyy i ugolovnyy protsessy: kollizii v sfere dokazyvaniya i puti ikh preodoleniya.-M.: Norma, 2006.-143s. 4. Poteeva A., Koryukaeva T. Izoblichenie poddelki// EZh-Yurist. 2008. № 34. 5. Ryzhakov A.P. Postateynyy kommentariy k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus». 6. Kommentariy k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) / pod red. V.V. Yarkova. 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Infotropik Media, 2011.-1152s. 7. Grazhdanskiy protsess zarubezhnykh stran: ucheb.posobie /pod red. d–ra yurid. nauk A.G.Davtyan.-M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2008.-480 s. 8. Grazhdanskoe protsessual'noe pravo: Uchebnik / pod red. M.S. Shakaryan.-M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2004.-584 s. 9. Anokhin V.S. Voprosy fal'sifikatsii dokazatel'stv v arbitrazhnom protsesse // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2009. № 12. S. 7-14. 10. Bonner A.T. Problemy ustanovleniya istiny v grazhdanskom protsesse. Monografiya.-SPb.: Yuridicheskaya kniga, 2009.-832 s.

Journals

Books

Lyahova, M.A. Legal nature of the contract for the development of the built-up area