Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Minina, A.I. The objective arbitrability in legislation, doctrine and arbitration practice in Russia

Abstract: The article concerns the definition of objective arbitrability. Based upon the provisions of the federal law the author provides a detailed evaluation of objective arbitrability, such as civil law nature of the dispute, presence of a foreign element in the disputed relations. The author studies the term “commercial enterprise of a party”. She formulates conclusions on arbitrability and non-arbitrability of certain categories of disputes, in particular, the disputes regarding immovable property in the territory of the Russian Federation or the titles to it; property disputes regarding use of subsoil resources; disputes between the participants of stock exchange bidding and their contracting parties; disputes on the authentic market or other price of evaluated object; disputes between suppliers and buyers regarding conclusion, amendment, termination and performance under the state contracts for supply of agricultural products, raw materials and foodstuffs for the state needs; disputes on compensation of harm; disputes between the state and investor based upon the agreement for the production sharing, copyright disputes. The author provides examples from the practice of the state arbitration courts, the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation. Special attention is paid to the disputes regarding legislation on bankruptcy, taxes, corporate disputes, conclusions on arbitrability and non-arbitrability based on the provisions of the Russian doctrine as well as the propositions of the practicing lawyers. The author offers to use the presumption of arbitrability of disputes as a general rule for objective arbitrability.


Keywords:

objective arbitrability, objective arbitrability, international commercial arbitration, arbitrability of disputes, arbitrability of dispute, dispute resolution, corporate disputes, fiscal disputes, insolvency disputes, International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Fe


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Vinogradova E.A. Voprosy treteyskogo razbiratel'stva v «pakete» zakonoproektov o sudeb-noy reforme // Treteyskiy sud. 2001. ¹ 3/4.
2. Zhil'tsov A.N. Osparivanie resheniy mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh arbitrazhey. Mezhduna-rodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh: sovremennye problemy i resheniya. Pod red. A.S. Komaro-va; MKAS pri TPP RF. M.: Statut, 2007.
3. Kanashevskiy V.A. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: Uchebnik. Izd. 2-e, dop. – M.: Mezhdunar. ot-nosheniya, 2009.
4. Karabel'nikov B.R., Makovskiy A.L. Arbitrabil'nost' sporov: rossiyskiy podkhod // Mezh-dunarodnoe chastnoe pravo, zashchita kul'turnykh tsennostey, intellektual'naya sobstven-nost', unifikatsiya prava; BWV, 2004.
5. Komarov A.S. Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh i gosudarstvennyy sud // Zakon. 2003. ¹ 2.
6. Kommentariy k Zakonu Rossiyskoy Federatsii «O mezhdunarodnom kommercheskom arbitra-zhe»: postateynyy, nauchno-prakticheskiy. Pod red. A.C. Komarova, S.N. Lebedeva, V.A. Musina. SPb.: ANO «Redaktsiya zhurnala «Treteyskiy sud», 2007.
7. Konventsiya Organizatsii Ob'edinennykh Natsiy o priznanii i privedenii v ispolnenie inostrannykh arbitrazhnykh resheniy 1958 g. // Vestnik VAS RF. 1993. ¹ 8.
8. Korporativnyy yurist. Arbitrabel'nost' korporativnykh sporov. URL: http://www.clj.ru/ publications/11/872/ (Data obrashcheniya 11/02/2013).
9. Kostin A.A. Pacta sunt servanda v aspekte arbitrazhnogo soglasheniya // Aktual'nye voprosy mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha. Otv. red. A.S. Komarov. M., 2002.
10. Krokhalev S.V. Kategoriya publichnogo poryadka v mezhdunarodnom grazhdanskom protsesse. Sravnitel'noe issledovanie na osnove pravovykh sistem Rossii i Frantsii: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2005.
11. Kurbatov R.A. K voprosu o razreshenii sporov pri realizatsii soglasheniy o razdele produk-tsii // Rossiyskiy sud'ya. 2005. ¹ 9.
12. Lebedev S.N. Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo v oblasti kommercheskogo arbitrazha. M., 1979.
13. Mata O.V. Arbitrazhnoe soglashenie i razreshenie sporov v mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh arbitrazhnykh sudakh. M., 2004.
14. Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh: sovremennye problemy i resheniya: Sbornik statey k 80-letiyu Mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazhnogo suda pri Torgovo-pro-myshlennoy palate Rossiyskoy Federatsii / pod red. A.A. Kostina; MKAS pri TPP RF. – M.: Statut, 2012.
15. Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh: uchebnik / B.R. Karabel'nikov. – M.: Infotropik Media: b. i., 2012.
16. Muranov A.I. Interv'yu dlya zhurnala «Zakon». URL: http://www.tpprf-arb.ru/ru/component/ docman/doc_details/51 (Data obrashcheniya 11.02.2012).
17. Musin V.A. O vzaimootnosheniyakh arbitrazhnykh i treteyskikh sudov // Arbitrazhnye spory. 2004. ¹ 1 (25).
18. Nigmatullina D. Arbitrabel'nost' korporativnykh sporov. URL: http://www.arbitrations. ru/?i=news/item&id=245 (Data obrashcheniya 11.02.2013).
19. Petrov M.V. Institut osparivaniya resheniy treteyskikh sudov: rol' norm APK // Tretey-skiy sud. 2004. ¹ 4 (34).
20. Praktika MKAS pri TPP RF za 2007-2008 gg. M., 2010.
21. Skvortsov O.Yu. Kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu «O treteyskikh sudakh v Rossiyskoy Fe-deratsii»: nauchno-prakticheskiy. Omega-L, 2003 g.
22. Skvortsov O.Yu. Treteyskiy sud. Arbitrabel'nost' sporov // Yurist i bukhgalter. 2004. ¹ 2 (15).
23. Skvortsov O.Yu. Treteyskoe razbiratel'stvo predprinimatel'skikh sporov v Rossii: proble-my, tendentsii, perspektivy. M.: Volters Kluver, 2005.
24. Sologub O. P. Usvoenie inoyazychnykh strukturnykh elementov v russkom yazyke. Nauka. Uni-versitet. 2002. Materialy Tret'ey nauchnoy konferentsii. Novosibirsk, 2002.
25. Usoskin S. Arbitrabel'nost': aktsii smenili nedvizhimost'. URL: http://zakon.ru/Blogs/ arbitrabelnost_akcii_smenili_nedvizhimost/1808 (Data obrashcheniya 11.02.2013).
26. Khvaley V. Arbitrazh – arbitry sami reshayut. Podlezhit li vopros razresheniyu v arbitrazh-nom poryadke // Treteyskiy sud. 2003. ¹ 4 (28).
27. Khvaley V. Kak ubit' arbitrazhnoe soglashenie // Treteyskiy sud. 2003. ¹ 5 (29).
28. Shaulko O. Arbitrazh ne prinimaet. URL: http://www.cetra.com.ua/files/tugaya_01.PDF (Data obrashcheniya 11.02.2012)