
	Actual problems of Russian law Reference: Shulakov, A.A. Consequential method in international private law // Actual problems of Russian law. 2014. № 1. P. 100-108. URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=63804 Shulakov, A.A. Consequential method in international private law Abstract: The article concern analysis of the mechanism of application of the principle of the closest l ink i n a ccordance w ith t he “ damage c omparison” m ethod ( consequential m ethod) o ffered by the American scientist W. Baxter and codified in the Book IV of the Civil Code of Louisiana developed by S. Symeonides. In accordance with the consequential method any act (action or a document) should be evaluated exclusively by its consequences. Consequentialism in the international private law is expressed by choice of applicable law based on consequences of this choice on interests and values of the conflicting laws. The author evaluates the legal factors forming the closest link and substantiates the conclusion that consequential methodology in the international private law limits the autonomy of will and also accumulates both public order reservations (public order reservation and institution of super-imperative norms), and he provides the definition of the closest link. Keywords: close link, comparative damage, public interests, consequentialism, consequential method, conflict of law regulations, autonomy of will, conflict of laws norm, material norms. This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References 1. Artem'eva O. V. U istokov sovremennoy etiki dobrodeteli. Elektronnaya biblioteka Insti-tuta filosofii Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk (poslednee poseshchenie – 1 iyunya 2013 g.). 2. Asoskov A. V. Osnovy kollizionnogo prava.-M.: Infotropik Media, 2012. 3. Vol'f M. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo. M.: Inostrannaya literatura. 1948. 4. Get'man-Pavlova I. V. Nauka mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava: dozvolitel'nyy i zapreti-tel'nyy statuty v teorii Bartolo de Sassoferrato // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chast-noe pravo, 2008, №5. 5. Zvekov V. P. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo. : Uchebnik.-2-e izd., pererab. i dop.-M.: Yurist', 2004. 6. Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii, chasti tret'ey (postatey-nyy) (Vinogradova R. I., Dmitrieva G. K., Repin V. S.) / pod redaktsiey V. P. Mozolina // SPS Konsul'tant Plyus. 7. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: Inostrannoe zakonodatel'stvo /Predisl. A. L. Makovskogo; sost. i nauchn. red. A. N. Zhil'tsov, A. I. Muranov. – M.: «Statut», 2001. 8. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: ucheb. /otv. red. G. K. Dmitrieva. – 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M.: Prospekt, 2010. 9. Prokof'ev A. V. Chelovecheskaya priroda i sotsial'naya spravedlivost' v sovremennom etiche-skom aristotelianstve. Elektronnaya biblioteka Instituta filosofii Rossiyskoy Akade-mii Nauk (poslednee poseshchenie – 1 iyunya 2013 g.). 10. Tri Svyatitelya. Vasiliy Velikiy, Grigoriy Bogoslov, Ioann Zlatoust. M.: Pravoslavnoe bratstvo svyatogo apostola Ioanna Bogoslova, 2012. Literatura na inostrannykh yazykakh 11. Anscombe G. E. M. Modern moral philosophy // Philosophy 33. 124. 1958. R. 1–19. (poslednee poseshchenie – 1 iyunya 2013 g.) 12. A LAW DICTIONARY ADAPTED TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND OF THE SEVERAL STATES OF THE AMERICAN UNION (poslednee poseshchenie – 1 iyunya 2013 g.). 13. Baxter W. F. Choice of Law and the Federal System. Stanford Law Review. Vol. 16, No. 1 (Dec., 1963). 14. College of Law: Faculty: Symeon C. Symeonides \| Willamette University. (poslednee poseshchenie – 1 iyunya 2013 g.). 15. Erin Ann O’Hara and Larry E. Ribstein. 9600 Conflict of Laws and Choice of Law. George Mason University School of Law. 1999. (poslednee poseshchenie – 1 iyunya 2013 g.) 16. Glossary of Conflict of Laws. Prof. William Tetley. McGill Law Faculty (poslednee poseshchenie – 1 iyunya 2013 g.). 17. Holger Spamann. Choice of Law in a Federal System and an Internal Market. 2001. (poslednee po-seshchenie – 1 iyunya 2013 g.) 18. Nygh P. E. The reasonable expectation of parties as a guide to the choice of law in contract and in tort // Collected courses of the Hague Academy of international law. Dordrecht et ctr.: Nighoff, 1995.-T. 251. 19. Passler R. G. Comparative Impairment: Louisiana’s New Methodology for Resolving Conflicts of Law // Louisiana Law Review. Vol. 52, № 2. 1991 (poslednee poseshchenie – 1 iyunya 2013 g.). 20. Symeon C. Symeonides. The Conflicts Book of the Louisiana Civil Code: Civilian, American, or Original? [To be published in 83 Tulane Law Review (2009)] (poslednee poseshchenie – 1 iyunya 2013 g.). 21. Symeon C. Symeonides. Private International Law at the End of the 20th Century: Progress or Regress?: XV International Congress of Comparative Law. P. 37 (poslednee poseshchenie – 1 iyunya 2013 g.). 22. Symeon C. Symeonides. Louisiana Conflicts Law: Two «Surprises»// Louisiana Law Review. V. 54 .№ 3. January 1994 (poslednee poseshchenie – 1 iyunya 2013 g.). 23. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (poslednee poseshchenie – 1 iyunya 2013 g.). 24. Visher F. General Course on Private International Law // Collected courses of the Hague Academy of international law,-Dordrecht et ctr.: Nighoff, 1992-(I). – T.232

Journals

Books

Shulakov, A.A. Consequential method in international private law