Library
|
Your profile |
The union of criminalists and criminologists
Reference:
P.A. Smirnov (2013). The Detention and the First Inquiry of the Detainee Suspect according
to the Criminal Procedural Legislation of Russia and Germany. The union of criminalists and criminologists, 2, 120–123. https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=63694
P.A. Smirnov The Detention and the First Inquiry of the Detainee Suspect according to the Criminal Procedural Legislation of Russia and GermanyAbstract: the differences in the regime of the fi rst inquiry of the detainee within the legal procedure in Russia and Germany has, fi rst of all, two main aspects. First of all, it is the subject of the inquiry. Unlike to Russia, where this act is held by the investigator (inquiry offi cer), in Germany this act is held by the independent (judicial) institute of power, free of interdepartmental interests. Of course, it strengthen the notion of the inquiry at the analyzed level of the criminal procedural activity. Second, as it is seen, the term till the inquiry starts according to the Criminal Procedural Code of Germany could be practically twice longer, making 24 hours, then the time, provided by the Criminal Procedural Code of RF. Actually, that fact should be treated rather than an advantage, because the Russian term is not enough to get prepared either by the detainee or the investigator. It deals with the necessity to solve many organizational questions, causing important procedural consequences — participation of the attorney in the criminal case (it is the obligation of the investigator), coordination of the case theory (by the attorney), etc. the author detects some rather perspective directions of perfection of the criminal procedural legislation of the both countries. Keywords: detention, inquiry, the detainee, legal procedure, the Criminal Procedural Code of RF, the Criminal Procedural Code of the Republic of Germany
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. Veretennikov, I. A. Zaderzhanie podozrevaemogo kak kompleksnyy pravovoy institut: avtoref. dis.... kand. yurid. nauk / I. A. Veretennikov. — M., 2001.
2. Golovenkov, P. Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy kodeks Federativnoy Respubliki Germaniya. Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy i perevod teksta zakona / P. Golovenkov, N. Spitsa. — Izdatel'stvo UniversitatsverlagPotsdam, 2012. 3. Golovko, L. V. Teoreticheskie osnovy modernizatsii ucheniya o material'noy istine v ugolovnom protsesse / L. V. Golovko // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2012. ¹ 4 (5). 4. Zaytsev, O. A. K voprosu o svidetel'stvovanii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve / O. A. Zaytsev, U. F. Dzhagaev // Obshchestvo i pravo. 2013. ¹ 2 (44). 5. Orlov, Yu. K. Ustanovlenie istiny kak tsel' dokazyvaniya v ugolovnom protsesse / Yu. K. Orlov // Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal. 2012. ¹ 4 (5). 6. Roxin, C. Strafverfahrensrecht / C. Roxin. — Munchen, 1995 |