Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

International relations
Reference:

Dashichev, V.I. Mission impossible of the Soviet foreign policy

Abstract: This article is devoted to the analytic note, presented to the Secretary General of the CPSU Central Committee Y.V. Andropov. The sharp confrontation between the Soviet Union and the coalition of the Western states in the late 1970s made the Soviet leaders face a number of matters in the sphere of improvement of the Soviet foreign policy. The attack on the Western positions posed a huge pressure on material and moral resources of the state, overstepping its real abilities. In order to guarantee the Communist Messiah expansion and wage the “Cold War” the USSR spent 15 to 30 percent of the GDP (compared to 5 per cent of GDP for the USA). It threatened to undermine the economic fundamentals of the state. The Soviet government violated the fundamental foreign policy principle, as formulated by von Clausewitz, providing that the established foreign political goals should strictly conform with the material resources and international situation. However, instead of easing the tension in the relations with the West, and lowering the pressure on the economies of the Soviet Union and its partners in the Warsaw Treaty Organization, in the 1970s the Kremlin chose to intensify the tension.


Keywords:

international relations, politics, the USSR, geo-policy, Andropov, diplomacy, ideology, security, values.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Asoskov A.V., Kucher A.N., Yadykin A.I. Deistvitel'ny li asimmetrichnye soglasheniya o poryadke razresheniya sporov po rossiiskomu pravu soglasno Postanovleniyu Prezidiuma VAS RF po delu Soni Eriksson (http://www.debevoise.com).
2. Barbe Zh., Rosher P. Optsionnye ogovorki o sposobakh razresheniya sporov: analiz s tochki zreniya frantsuzskogo i angliiskogo prava // Vestnik mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha. 2011. ¹ 1.
3. Belomestnova N., Trusova E. VAS priznal «assimetrichnye» al'ternativnye arbitrazhnye ogo-vorki nedeistvitel'nymi (http://www.gblplaw.ru/news/legal/72563/).
4. Guseva V., Moshennikov Ya. VAS RF ne podderzhal al'ternativnye (assimetrichnye) arbitrazhnye soglasheniya (http://www.dlapiper.com/ru/global/publications/detail.aspx?pub=7567).
5. Egorov A.V. Assimetrichnye ogovorki o razreshenii sporov sudebnaya praktika zamenyaet na sim-metrichnye // Vestnik mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha. 2012. ¹ 2.
6. Ishchuk I., Samoilov M. Optsionnaya ogovorka v praktike VAS RF // Legal Insight. 2012. ¹ 9(15).
7. Kakoletskii A., Novachek P. Novyi pol'skii Zakon ob arbitrazhe // Mezhdunarodnyi kommercheskii arbitrazh. 2007. ¹ 4.
8. Kalinin M., Khvalei V. VAS RF priznal nedeistvitel'noi disparitetnuyu arbitrazhnuyu ogovorku (http://www.bakermckenzie.com/ru-RU/ALRussiaSupremeArbitrazhCourtRulesJun12).
9. Panov A. Odnostoronnie (optsional'nye) prorogatsionnye soglasheniya nedeistvitel'ny ne tol'ko v Rossii (http://zakon.ru/blogs/odnostoronnie_opcionalnye_prorogacionnye_soglasheniya_ nedejstvitelny_ne_tolko_v_rossii/4207).
10. Pleshanova O. «Bystree i za men'shie den'gi»//Mog proigrat' Berezovskii Abramovichu v rossiiskom sude (http://zakon.ru/blogs/bystree_i_za_menshie_dengi__mog_proigrat_berezovskij_ abramovichu_v_rossijskom_sude/4975).
11. Praktika Mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazhnogo suda pri TPP RF za 2001-2002 gg. / Sost. Rozenberg M.G. M.: Statut, 2004.
12. Khodykin R.M. Gibridnye ogovorki o rassmotrenii spora // Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2012. ¹ 11.
13. Ancel M.-E., Marion L., Wynaendts L. Refl ections on one-sided jurisdiction clauses in international litigation (about Rothschild decision, French Cour de cassation, 26 September 2012) (http://ssrn.com/ abstract=2258419).
14. Berard M., Dingley J. Unilateral option clauses in arbitration: a survey as to their effectiveness (http://www. cliffordchance.com/publicationviews/publications/2013/02/unilateral_optionclausesinarbitration.html).
15. Berard M., Dingley J. Unilateral option clauses in arbitration: an international overview (http://uk.practicallaw. com/7-535-3743).
16. Bevan A. Optional arbitration agreements: the English position (http://www.cdr-news.com/categories/ expert-views/optional-arbitration-agreements-the-english-position).
17. Blaszczak L., Ludwik M. Sadownictwo polubowne (Arbitraz). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, 2007.a
18. Born G. B. International Commercial Arbitration. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009.
19. Browne O., Clifford P. Avoiding pitfalls in drafting and using unilateral option clauses (http://www. lw.com/thoughtLeadership/IA-News-in-Brief-Unilateral-Option-Clauses).
20. Cuniberti G. Bulgarian Court Strikes Down One Way Jurisdiction Clause (http://confl ictofl aws.net/2012/ bulgarian-court-strikes-down-one-way-jurisdiction-clause/).
21. Dewar J. International Project Finance: Law and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
22. Drahozal C.R. Nonmutual Agreements to Arbitrate // Journal of Corporation Law. University of Iowa College of Law. 2002.
23. Duranske B.T. Virtual law. American Bar Association, 2008.
24. Erecinski T., Ciszewski J., Weitz K. Kodeks postepowania cywilnego. Komentarz. Czesc czwarta – Przepisy z zakresu miedzynarodowego postepowania cywilnego. Czesc piata-Sad polubowny (arbitrazowy). Warszawa: LexisNexis, 2009.
25. Erecinski T., Weitz K. Sad arbitrazowy. Warszawa: LexisNexis, 2008.
26. Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman On International Commercial Arbitration / Edited by Gaillard E. and Savage J.: The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1999.
27. Horton D. Unconscionability wars // Northwestern University Law Review. 2012. Vol. 106 Issue 1.
28. Jentz G.A., Miller R.L. Business Law Today: Comprehensive Edition.
29. Morek R. Mediacja i arbitraz. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck, 2006.
30. Perrella C. Italy: Italian Supreme Court Considers Unilateral Jurisdiction Clauses (http://www.mondaq. com/x/231358/arbitration+dispute+resolution/italian+supreme).
31. Pryles M.C. Dispute Resolution in Asia. Kluwer Law International, 2006.
32. Rossman V.R., Moskin M. Commercial Contracts: Strategies for Drafting and Negotiating. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2013.
33. M. Tomaszewski. Skutecznosc ochrony prawnej przed sadami polubownymi. Doswiadczenia polskie // PS. 2006, ¹ 1