Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Idrisov, I.T., Idrisov, N.T. On correlation of the terms «forced labor» and «slave labor» and some problems of qualification and use of slave labor

Abstract: In modern Russia the role of labor-based punishments is currently growing. This fact can be explained by the general tendency of greater application of alternative types of punishments not concerning deprivation of freedom (imprisonment), as well as by the greater representation of labor-based punishments within the system of punishments. In order to establish and apply this type of punishment one needs to study the issues of lawfulness of forced labor and limits to its application. Defining the criteria for distinguishing forced labor and slave labor, as well as similar social matters, is necessary in order to duly qualify the crime of use of slave labor (Art. 127.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). The authors of the article distinguish between the legislatively allowed and prohibited forced labor. The state has no right to use forced labor with elements of slave labor or to force to work. Enslavement of a person and use of the slave work of a person, who cannot refuse to perform the work (service) without risk to his natural rights, presupposes forced labor. The problem of correlation of forced labor and slavery was also brought to the attention of the researchers due to the new type of punishment in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which is compulsory labor. This punishment may be regarded as a modification of slave labor.


Keywords:

jurisprudence, punishment, forced, labor, correlation, obligatory, slave, crime, qualification, slavery.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Alenina I.V. O ponyatii «sfera deystviya trudovogo prava» // Problemy pravovogo reguli-rovaniya trudovykh otnosheniy. Ch. 1. Sbornik materialov nauchnoy konferentsii. — Omsk: Om-skiy gos. un-t, 2004. — S. 13.
2. Gardey M.V., Epifanov B.V. Problemy kvalifikatsii ispol'zovaniya rabskogo truda v Rossii // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. — 2011. — ¹2 (50). — S. 45.
3. Gromov S.V. Nekotorye voprosy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy — torgovlya lyud'mi i ispol'-zovanie rabskogo truda // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. — 2005. — ¹3. — S. 57.
4. Kibal'nik A.I., Solomonenko I.A. Novye prestupleniya protiv lichnoy svobody // Rossiy-skaya yustitsiya. — 2004. — ¹4. — S. 45.
5. Kotel'nikova E.A., Shumikhin V.G. Razgranichenie nasil'stvennykh i nenasil'stvennykh pre-stupleniy protiv polovoy svobody i polovoy neprikosnovennosti // Izvestiya vuzov. Pra-vovedenie. — 2008. — ¹5. — S. 23.
6. Kruglikov L.L. Ugolovno-pravovye sredstva protivodeystviya rabotorgovle i smezhnym s ney formam // Prestupnost' i ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo: realii, tendentsii, vzaimovli-yanie. — Saratov, 2004. — 300 s.
7. Krylova N.E. K voprosu o garmonizatsii i gumanizatsii ugolovnogo zakona // Ugolovnoe pra-vo. — 2011. — ¹6. — S. 33.
8. Mezhdunarodnye akty o pravakh cheloveka. Sbornik dokumentov. — M., 2000.
9. Smirnov D.A. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya kategoriya «prinuditel'nyy trud» i ee implementa-tsiya v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve // Vestnik YarGU. Seriya Gumanitarnye nauki. — 2012. — ¹1 (19). — S. 79-81.
10. Khabarov A.V. Ugolovnoe pravo RF. Osobennaya chast'. Ch. 1. — Tyumen', 2005. — 360 s