Šóń Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Savin, V.T. On the issue of independency and material responsibility of the parties to a labor contract as a type of legal responsibility

Abstract: The article includes analysis of the necessity of study of material responsibility in the sphere of labor law and its place within the system of legal responsibility in Russian law as a whole. It includes analysis of various points of view of legal scholars, including those specializing in labor law. Some of such scholars single out material responsibility of employees and employers as independent types of legal responsibility, while other scholars view it as a part of civil law, disciplinary or labor law responsibility, which leads to its assimilation within the above-mentioned types of responsibility. Therefore, to some extent all of those scholars fail to recognize material responsibility as an independent type of legal responsibility, which may have negative influence upon the legal practice in this sphere. The article contains detailed basis for distinguishing material responsibility under the norms of labor law from other types of legal responsibility, and criticism of abovementioned approaches to this type of responsibility. Based on the above, the author comes to a conclusion that material responsibility of the parties to the labor contract is bilateral, it has general and specific characteristic features, and it should be regarded as a complete, indivisible legal category within labor law, and as an independent type of responsibility in Russian law.


Keywords:

jurisprudence, legal responsibility, material responsibility, disciplinary responsibility, civil law responsibility, labor law responsibility, employer, employee, labor contract, institution.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Anisimov L.N., Anisimov A.L. Trudovye otnosheniya i material'naya otvetstvennost'. — M.: Eksmo, 2005. — 496 s.
2. Bednyakova N.V. Pravovye problemy material'noy otvetstvennosti rabotodatelya: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2006.
3. Bratus' S.N. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' i zakonnost'. — M.: Gorodets-Izdat., 2001. — 208 s.
4. Vengerov A.B. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik. — M.: Yurisprudentsiya, 2000. — 528 s.
5. Geykhman V.L., Dmitrieva I.K. Trudovoe pravo: uchebnik dlya vuzov. — M.: ID Yurayt, 2011. — 523 s.
6. Gusov K.N., Poletaev Yu.N. Otvetstvennost' po rossiyskomu trudovomu pravu. — M.: Prospekt, 2008. — 272 s.
7. Gusov K.N., Poletaev Yu.N. Otvetstvennost' po rossiyskomu trudovomu pravu. — M.: Prospekt, 2011. — 272 s.
8. Dozortsev A.V. Imushchestvennaya otvetstvennost' voennosluzhashchikh za ushcherb, prichinennyy vo-yskovoy chasti // Trudy Voenno-yuridicheskoy akademii. —1949. — Vyp.
9. — s. 84–93. 9. Drachuk M.A. K voprosu o samostoyatel'nosti instituta material'noy otvetstvennosti rabot-nika i ego sootnoshenii s distsiplinoy truda // Pravovedenie. — 2008. — ¹ 1. — s. 101–114.
10. Karinskiy S.S. Material'naya otvetstvennost' rabochikh i sluzhashchikh po sovetskomu trudovo-mu pravu. — M.: Gosyurizdat, 1955. — 201 s.
11. Karpenko O.I. Distsiplinarnaya otvetstvennost' rabotnika v trudovom prave: ponyatie i vidy: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2003.
12. Kiselev I.Ya., Lushnikov A.M. Trudovoe pravo Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran. Mezhdunarodnye normy truda. — M.: Eksmo, 2008. — 608 s.
13. Klenov E.A., Malov V.G. Material'naya otvetstvennost' rabochikh i sluzhashchikh na predpriyatii. — M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1968. — 152 s.
14. Kovalev V.A. Otvetstvennost' v trudovom prave: teoreticheskie aspekty: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2012.
15. Kommentariy k Trudovomu kodeksu RF / pod red. Yu.P. Orlovskogo. — M.: «Kontrakt», «Infra-M», 2002. — 959 s.
16. Kuznetsov Yu.A. Trudopravovaya otvetstvennost': ponyatie; vidy: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — Perm', 2005.
17. Livshits R.Z. Otvetstvennost' za povrezhdenie zdorov'ya rabochikh i sluzhashchikh v sovetskom prave // Sov. gosudarstvo i pravo. — 1964. — ¹ 5. — s. 105–112.
18. Lushnikov A.M. Problemy obshchey chasti rossiyskogo trudovogo prava: nauchnoe nasledie, sovre-mennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy issledovaniy: avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. — M., 2004.
19. Marchenko M.N. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava. — M.: Prospekt, 2006. — 640 s.
20. Monastyrskiy E.A., Simorot Z.K. Kharakter norm, reguliruyushchikh vozmeshchenie ushcherba, prichinen-nogo zdorov'yu rabochikh i sluzhashchikh // Sov. gosudarstvo i pravo. — 1973. — ¹ 3. — s. 47–54.
21. Patrov V.V., Pyatov M.L. Material'naya otvetstvennost' rabotnikov organizatsii. — M.: Fi-nansy i statistika, 2001. — 176 s.
22. Peshkova O.A. Material'naya otvetstvennost' storon trudovykh otnosheniy: Teoriya i prakti-ka. — M.: Os'–89, 2007. — 256 s.
23. Poletaev Yu.N. Pravoporyadok i otvetstvennost' v trudovom prave. — M.: Prospekt, 2001. — 184 s.
24. Problemy obshchey teorii prava i gosudarstva: uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod obshch. red. V.S. Nerse-syantsa. — M.: NORMA–INFRA-M, 2001. — 832 s.
25. Pustozerova V.M., Solov'ev A.A. Material'naya otvetstvennost'. Prakticheskoe posobie. — M.: Prior, 1996. — 96 s.
26. Rossiyskoe trudovoe pravo: uchebnik dlya vuzov / otv. red. A.D. Zaykin. — M.: INFRA-M–NOR-MA, 1997. — 415 s.
27. Samoylov V.G. Distsiplinarnaya otvetstvennost' v trudovom prave: obshchaya i spetsial'naya: av-toref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. — M., 2006.
28. Smirnov V.T. O sootnoshenii material'noy otvetstvennosti rabochikh i sluzhashchikh po sovet-skomu trudovomu pravu i imushchestvennoy otvetstvennosti po grazhdanskomu pravu // Vest-nik LGU. — 1963. — ¹ 17. Vyp. 3. — s. 40-48.
29. Sovetskoe trudovoe pravo: uchebnik / pod red. A.S. Pashkova, O.V. Smirnova. — M.: Yuridiche-skaya literatura, 1982. — 504 s.
30. Stavisskiy P.R. Vzaimnaya material'naya otvetstvennost' sub'ektov trudovogo pravootno-sheniya // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. — 1974. — ¹ 11. — s. 62–66.
31. Syrovatskaya L.A. Material'naya otvetstvennost' rabochikh i sluzhashchikh po sovetskomu tru-dovomu pravu — odin iz vidov yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti // Trudy VYuZI. — 1966. — t. V. — s. 37-43.
32. Syrovatskaya L.A. Otvetstvennost' za narushenie trudovogo zakonodatel'stva. — M.: Yuridi-cheskaya literatura, 1990. — 176 s.
33. Syrovatskaya L.A. Trudovoe pravo: uchebnik. — M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1995. — 255 s.
34. Syrovatskaya L.A. Trudovoe pravo: uchebnik. — M.: Yurist, 1998. — 312 s.
35. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava / pod red. V.M. Korel'skogo i V.D. Perevalova. — M.: Infra-M — Norma, 2002. — 574 s.
36. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik / pod red. A.S. Pigolkina. — M.: Yurayt-Izdat, 2005. — 613 s.
37. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik / pod red. V.K. Babaeva. — M.: Yurist', 2005. — 592 s.
38. Timoshenko I.V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost': ucheb. posobie. — M., Rostov-n/D.: Fe-niks, 2004. — 162 s.
39. Tishchenkov I.A. O ponyatii material'noy otvetstvennosti rabochikh i sluzhashchikh po sovetsko-mu trudovomu pravu // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. — 1964. — ¹ 2. — s. 49–57.
40. Tolkunova V.N. Trudovoe pravo: kurs lektsiy. — M.: TK Velbi, 2003. — 320 s.
41. Trudovoe pravo Rossii: uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod red. S.Yu. Golovinoy, M.V. Molodtsova. — M.: Norma, 2009. — 704 s.
42. Trudovoe pravo Rossii: uchebnik / pod obshch. red. A.Ya. Ryzhenkova. — M.: Yurayt-Izdat, 2009. — 523 s.
43. Trudovoe pravo Rossii: uchebnik / pod red. S.P. Mavrina, E.B. Khokhlova. — M.: Yurist', 2003. — 560 s.
44. Trudovoe pravo: uchebnik / otv. red. O.V. Smirnov. — M.: Status LTD+, 1996. — 384 s.
45. Trudovoe pravo: uchebnik / pod red. O.V. Smirnova. — M.: Prospekt, 2000. — 512 s.
46. Khropanyuk V.N. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik. — M.: Interstil', Omega-L, 2006. — 382 s.
47. Chervonyuk V.I. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik. — M.: INFRA-M, 2006. — 704 s.
48. Yachmenev Yu.V. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' i ee vidy v sovremennoy uchebnoy literature: kriticheskiy analiz // Gosudarstvo i pravo. — 2002. — ¹ 8. — s. 90–98