Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Poduzova Ekaterina Borisovna Framework contract in modern civil law

Abstract: The article is devoted to the definition, characteristic features and contents of the framework contract. The author analyzes the approaches of various scholars on these legal issues, and she also provides her position on definition and characteristic features of framework contract. The framework contract is a contract under which the parties agree to conclude the main contract (or several such contracts) in the future, and it should contain the clause on the term of its application, object of the main contract (contracts), some other conditions of the main contract (contracts). The essential conditions of the framework (organization) contract should include the clauses on its term of application, its object, and the object of the main contract (contracts). The author studies the correlation between the framework contract and the open-clause contract in the legislation and science of the Great Britain and the USA. The author then comes to a conclusion on the need to distinguish these lecgal constructions, when they are provided for in the Russian legislation.


Keywords:

jurisprudence, construction, framework, organization, main, contract, conditions, contents, distinguishing, legislation.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Belov V.A. Grazhdanskoe pravo: Obshchaya i osobennaya chasti. M., 2003. 960 s.
2. Braginskiy M.I., Vitryanskiy V.V. Dogovornoe pravo. Kniga pyataya, tom pervyy: Dogovory o zayme, bankovskom kredite i faktoringe. Dogovory, napravlennye na sozdanie kollektiv-nykh obrazovaniy. M., 2006 // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
3. Egorova M.A. Organizatsionnoe otnoshenie i organizatsionnye sdelki v grazhdansko-pravo-vom regulirovanii // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2011. ¹5. S. 10–21.
4. Efimova L. G. Ramochnye (organizatsionnye) dogovory. M., 2006. 104 s.
5. Ilyushina M.N. Osobennosti pravovoy prirody obyazatel'stvennykh otnosheniy s uchastiem pred-prinimateley v svete Kontseptsii sovershenstvovaniya grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva // Pred-prinimatel'skoe pravo. Prilozhenie «Biznes i pravo v Rossii i za rubezhom». 2010. ¹3.
6. Maleina M.N. Soglashenie o protsedure peregovorov (peregovornykh protsedurakh) // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2011. ¹5. S. 22–24.
7. Mozolin V.P. Obshchie polozheniya o dogovore. V: Mozolin V.P., Maslyaev A.I. Grazhdanskoe pravo. M., 2008. Ch. 1. 719 s.
8. Morozov S.Yu. Sistema transportnykh organizatsionnykh dogovorov: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2011. 501 s.
9. Poduzova E.B. Organizatsionnyy dogovor i ego vidy: dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2012. 237 s.
10. Safonova E.Yu. K voprosu razgranicheniya ponyatiy «organizatsionnyy» i «ramochnyy» dogovo-ry // Yuridicheskiy mir. 2011. ¹8.
11. Blackshaw I.S. Sports marketing agreements: legal, fiscal and practical aspects. The Hague, 2011. 536 p.
12. Creed J.M. Integrating preliminary agreements into the interference torts // Columbia Law Review. 2010. Vol. 110: 1253. P. 1253–1293.
13. Farnsworth A. Precontractual liability and preliminary agreements: fair dealing and failed negotiations // Columbia Law Review. 1987. Vol. 87. ¹2. P. 217–294.
14. Kostritsky J.P. Uncertainty, Reliance, Preliminary Negotiations and the Holdup Problem // SMU LAW REVIEW. 2008. Vol. 61. P. 1377–1440.
15. O’Sullivan J. & Hilliard J. The Law of Contract. New York, 2008. 492 p.
16. Schwartz A., Scott. R.E. Precontractual liability and preliminary agreements // Harvard Law Review. 2007. ¹1. P. 661–707