Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Actual problems of Russian law
Reference:

Suleymanov Bigruzi Bukharinovich Court within the system of state power (methodological aspects)

Abstract: Judicial power Is not only one of the branches of the state power, or part of the state mechanism, it is also a reliable guarantee of the human rights and freedoms. An independent court is a part of the legal state and civil society. However, the attitude towards judicial power was not always positive. Even the forefathers of the concept of separation of powers (John Locke, Charles Montesquieu) underestimated the role and value of the court. The analysis shows that the powers of an independent court were recognized by the Fathers of the American Constitution. For them an efficient government system was a practical necessity, since a new state was formed based on the new social values. One should mention that the Russian legal system contained various attitudes to court. It was the Judicial Reform of 1864, which finally managed to somewhat change the attitude to the courts. However, in early XX century the well-known historical events got the judicial branch under the control of the party nomenclature. In our opinion the Russian society does not yet recognize the inalienable value of the court.


Keywords:

jurisprudence, state, power, judicial power, civil society, legislative branch, separation of power, legal system, rights and freedoms, legal conscience.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Avak'yan S.A. Konstitutsiyu nado ne popravlyat', a menyat' // Rossiyskaya Federatsiya segodnya. 1999. ¹5. S. 32–34.
2. Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M., 1990.
3. Gobbs T. Sochineniya: v 2 t. T. 2. M., 1991.
4. Zaichenko G.I. Lokk. M.,1988.
5. Kolokolov N.A. Sudebnaya reforma: nekotorye problemy kriminologii sudoustroystva i ugolovnogo protsessa. Kursk, 2000.
6. Lokk Dzh. Dva traktata o pravlenii M., 1988. T. 3.
7. Marchenko M.N. Sovremennye interpretatsii teorii razdeleniya vlastey // Razdelenie vla-stey: ucheb. posob. / pod red. M.N. Marchenko. M., 2004.
8. Nersesyants V.S. Kontseptsiya razdeleniya vlastey: konstitutsionnaya model' i deystvitel'-nost' // Gosudarstvenno-pravovoe razvitie. M., 1998.
9. Lokk Dzh. Dva traktata o pravlenii. M., 1988. T. 3.
10. Lykoshin A.S. Sudoustroystvo // Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' Brokzauza i Efrona. SPb., 1901. T. 63. S. 945-948.
11. Montesk'e Sh.L. O Dukhe zakonov // Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M., 1955.
12. Reykers B.S. Ukreplenie sudebnoy vlasti — odno iz vazhneyshikh usloviy razvitiya rossiy-skoy gosudarstvennosti v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Gosudarstvenno-pravovoe razvitie. M., 1998.
13. Poznyshev S.V. Elementarnyy uchebnik russkogo ugolovnogo protsessa. M., 1913.
14. Pravovye sistemy stran mira / pod red. A.Ya. Sukhareva. M., 2001.
15. Terekhov V.I. Stanovlenie i razvitee kontseptsii razdeleniya vlastey // Razdelenie vlastey: ucheb. posob. / pod red. M.N. Marchenko. M., 2004.
16. Federalist. Politicheskoe esse A. Gamil'tona, Dzh. Medisona i Dzh. Dzheya / per. s ang. M., 1993.
17. Chirkin V.E. Gosudarstvovedenie. M., 1999