|
Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:
Yumashev Yu. M.
“The Development of the” European Idea
“after the First World War: from” Pan-Europe”
of R. Coudenhov — Kalergi to ‘Neo-Functionalism’
of E. Haas and Interstate Theory of Integration
of A. Moravchik
// Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law.
2012. ¹ 6.
P. 70-82.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=62018
Yumashev Yu. M. “The Development of the” European Idea
“after the First World War: from” Pan-Europe”
of R. Coudenhov — Kalergi to ‘Neo-Functionalism’
of E. Haas and Interstate Theory of Integration
of A. Moravchik
Abstract:
The article traces the evolution of the «European» idea from the First World War to the present day. The doctrinal
views and concepts of Coudenhov-Kalergi, A. Brian, W. Morgenthau, D. Mitrani, J. Monnet, E. Haas, A. Moravchik, and
others, determined the development of the modern European Union are analyzed.
Keywords:
The League of Nations, the European Union, «European» idea, the doctrine of European unification, R. Coudenhov-Kalergi, A. Brian, W. Morgenthau, D. Mitrani, J.Monnet, E. Haas, A. Moravcsik.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here
.
References
1. Teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy. Khrestomatiya / Red. P.A. Tsygankov. M., 2002. s. 72 i sl.
2. Mone Zh. «Real'nost' i politika». M., 2001.
3. Moravetskiy V. Funktsii mezhdunarodnoy organizatsii. M., 1976. s. 81.
4. The history of the idea of Europe (ed.by K.Wilson, J.van der Dussen). L., 1999. p. 99.
5. Chabot J.-L. “Aux origins intellectualles de L’Union europe’enne”. Grenoble, 2005. p. 43.
6. Morgenthau H. “In defense of national interest. A critical examination of American foreign policy”. N.-Y., 1951.
7. Louis J.-V. “L’ ordre juridique communautaire”. Bruxelles, Luxembourg, 1988. p. 12.
8. Moravcsic. Negotiating the Single Euripean Act // R. Keochane, S. Hoffman (eds), The new European Community, Boulder, 1991, p. 41 ff.
9. A.Moravcsic. Preferences and power in the European Community. A liberal Intergouvernmentalist Approach// Journal of Common Market Studies. ¹4. 1993. p. 473 ff.
10. The member-States of the European Union”. Eds. S. Bulmer, Ch. Lequesne. Oxford, 2005. p. 7.
11. Wiener TH. Diez, (eds.) “European Integration theory”. Oxford, 2005; H.-J. Lauth, R. Zimmerling, (Hrsg), “Die Europaeische Union. Theorien und Analysekonzepte”, Paderborn, 2005.
12. Chalmers D., Davies G., Monti G. (eds), “European Union Law”, Cambridge, 2010, p. 352 ff.
13. Lauth H.-J., Zimmerling R. op.cit., S. 179-180.
14. Oppermann Th., Classen Cl., Nettesheim M. “Europarecht”, Muenchen, 2011, S. 21 ff.; M. Herdegen, “Europarecht”, Muenchen, 2010. S. 68 ff.
15. Schmidt S., Schuenemann W., “Europaeische Union”, Baden-Baden, 2009. S. 36 ff.
16. Nohlen (Hrsg) D. “ Kleines Lexikon der Politik, 2002, Muenchen. S. 403
|
Eng
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
