|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:
U. Klinke
Development of the Jurisdiction
of the Court of the European Union
// Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law.
2012. ¹ 6.
P. 57-69.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=62017
U. Klinke Development of the Jurisdiction of the Court of the European UnionAbstract: This article deals with the future evolution of the architecture of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the General Court (formerly known as Court of first instance) in connection with the increasing workload of the General Court and the forthcoming accession of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950. Proposals to reduce the congestion of General Court by increasing the number of judges of the General Court and by creating a specialized Trademark Court are analyzed. Problems in the relationship of the Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights, which will arise from the accession of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms are described. Keywords: European Court of Justice (ECJ), General Court, evolution of the architecture of the EU courts, judicial remedies, European Court of Human Rights.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. Protokol ¹8 k st. 6(2) Dogovora o prisoedinenii ES k EKPCh (OJ. 2010, C. 83/273); Deklaratsiya ¹2 k st. 6(2) DES (O.J.2008, C 115/337).
2. Reglament 40/94 o tovarnom znake Soobshchestva (O.J. 1994, L/11/1). Zamenen Reglamentom 207/2009 — O.J. L.78/1. 3. Reshenie Soveta ES 88/ 591 o sozdanii Suda 1-oy instantsii sm. O.J. 1988, L.319|1 4. Reglament 1906/2006 o registratsii, otsenke, dopuske i ogranichenii ispol'zovaniya khimicheskikh materialov (REACH). 5. Direktiva 2008/ 95 o sblizhenii pravovykh norm gosudarstv-chlenov, reguliruyushchikh tovarnye znaki — O.J. 2008, L. 299/25 6. House of Lords, European Union Committee, 14th Report of Session 2010-2011. The workload of the Court of Justice of the European Union, 2011, p. 18. 7. C-385/07 Der Gruene Punkt/ Commission (2009) 8. T-41/05 Alliance One International/ Kommission 9. T-38/05 Agroexpansion/Kommission 10. T-58/01 Solvay/ Kommission (2009) 11. C-110/10 P, Solvay/ Kommission (2011) 12. U. Klinke, “Le juge unique aupres du Trbunal de L’ Union Europeenne, R.A.E. 2010,467 13. Garcia-Valdecasas, “Le Tribunal de1-er instancedes Communautes Europeennes a la croisee des chemins, Concurrences”, Revue des droits de la concurrence”, RDLC,2008,1. 14. J. Sack, “ Zur kuenftigen europaeischen Gerichtsbarkeit nach Nizza”, EuZW,2001,77. 15. Sennekamp, “Alle Staatsgewalt geht vom Volke aus! Demokratieprinzip und Selbstverwaltung der Justiz” — NVwZ, 2010, 213. 16. Kokott, Devisopoulos, Henze, “Aktuelle Fragen des effektiven Rechtsschutzes durch die Gemeinschaftsgerichte”, EuGRZ 2008, 10, 15. 17. U. Everling, ‘Zur Fortbildung der Gerichtsbarkeit der Europaeischen Gemeinschaften nach Nizza”: in “Tradition und Weltoffenheit des Rechts” — Festschrift Steinberger, 2002, S.1103,1116. 18. Th. Schilling, “Der Beitritt der EU zur EMRK — Verhandlungen und Modalitaeten” — Humboldt Forum Recht, ¹8, 2011, S. 83 19. G. Meier. “Zur Einwirkung des EU-Rechts auf nationales Verfahrensrecht im Falle hoechstrichterlicher Vertragsverletzungen”, EuZW 1991, S.11 |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
