Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:

A.S. Ispolinov Balancing Between the Freedom of Internal Market and Human Rights in the Judicial Practice of The EU

Abstract: This article deals with the evolution of the position of the Court of the EU in relation to human rights in the EU. In this case, the author dwells in detail on the cases examined by the EU Court of Justice, in which the Court solves the conflict between the basic economic freedoms of the internal market and human rights. The author concludes that the EU Court finds the compromise balance of conflicting interests in every case of conflict for fundamental market freedoms and human rights.

Keywords:

internal market, human rights, court practice, the EU Court of Justice, the basic economic freedoms, the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the European integration, EU law, the balance of interests, restrictions on freedom of the market.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services, OJ 1997 L 18.
2. Case 26/62 Van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen ECR [1963] 1. Sm. takzhe Case 6/64 Flamingo Costa v. ENEL [1964] ECR 586.
3. Case 29/69 Stauder v City of Ulm, [1969] ECR, para. 7.
4. Case 36/75 Roland Rutili v Ministre de l’intérieur [1975] ECR 1219.
5. Case 40/64 Sgarlata and others v. Commission of the EC [1965] ECR 215.
6. Case C-112/00 Eugen Schmidberger, Internationale Transporte und Planzüge v Austria [2003] ECR I-5659.
7. Case C-260/98 Elliniki Radiophonia Tileorassi Anonimi Etairia (ERT AE) v. Dimotiki Etairia Pliroforissis (DEP) and Sotirios Kouvelas [1991] ECR I-2925.
8. Case C-265/95 Commission v France [1997] ECR I-6959.
9. Case C-309/96 Annibaldi [1997] ECR I-7493.
10. Cases C-46 and 48/93 Brasserie du Pecheur SA v. Germany [1996] ECR I-1029.
11. Case Frontini v Ministerio delle Finanze, judgment of December 27, 1973, Guir. Const. 2401.
12. Sases 36-38/59 40/59 Greitling v High Authority of the ECSC [1960] ECR 859.
13. Case C-341/05 Laval un Partneri Ltd v Svenska Byggnadsarbetareförbundet, Svenska Byggnadsarbetareförbundets avd. 1, Byggettan, Svenska Elektrikerförbundet, Laval, 18 December 2007.
14. Case C-438/05 International Transport Workers’ Federation, Finnish Seamen’s Union v Viking Line ABP, OÜ Viking Line Eesti, Viking, 11 December 2007.
15. Case C-36/02 Omega Spielhallen—und Automatenaufstellungs—GmbH v Oberbürgermeisterin der Bundesstadt Bonn [2004] ECR I-9609.
16. Case 1/58 Stork & Cie v ECSC High Authority [1959] ECR 43.
17. Case No 11/70 Internationale Hanselsgesellschaft mbH v. Einfuhr-und Vorratsstelle fur Getreide und Futtermittel [1970] ECR, p.419, par. 7.
18. Case 4/ 73 Nold KG v. Commission [1974] ECR, p. 491, par. 13.
19. Case 5/88 Herbert Wachauf v. Bundesamt f ¨ur Ern¨ahrung und Forstwirtschaft, [1989] ECR 2609, par. 19.
20. Case C-6 and 9/90 Francovich and Bonifaci v. Italy [1991], ECR I-5357.
21. Charles F. Sabel and Oliver Gerstenberg “Constitutionalizing an Overlapping Consensus: The ECJ and the Emergence of a Coordinate Constitutional Order” // European Law Journal, Vol. 16, No. 5, September 2010, pp. 511–550.
22. Coppel J. and O’Neill, A. “The European Court of Justice: Taking rights seriously” (1995) 29 C.M.L.Rev, 669.
23. Doğan Y. “The Fundamental Rights Jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice: protection for human rights within the European legal order” //Ankara Law Review, Vol. 54 6, No. 1, pages 53-81,
24. Douglas-Scott S. “A tale of two courts: Luxembourg, Strasbourg and the growing European human rights acquis” // Common Market Law Review, vol 34, 2006, page 645.
25. Payandeh M. “Constitutional review of EU law after HONEYWELL: contextualizing the relationship between the German Constitutional Court and the EU Court of Justice. // Common Market Law Review vol. 48 9–38, 2011.
26. Rosas A. “Justice in Haste, Justice denied? The European Court of Justice and the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice” // Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, volume 11, 2008-2009, page 10.
27. Skouris V. “Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: The Challenge of Striking a Delicate Balance”, [2006] EBLR 229
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2025 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.