Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Culture and Art
Reference:

Mikhailov, A. Yu. «Classical as the Russian» or «classical vs. Russian»: the problem for “nationalization “of the classicism and the formulation of a national style in architecture, Russia XVIII–XX centuries.

Abstract: in this article, using the methodology of architectural (V. Paperny, B. Vilkovsky) and Art Criticism (E. Panofsky) and in general humanities (Michel Foucault) attempt to examine classicism as an option for national style in Russia, whose formulation was one of the main tasks of the Russian authorities and architecture XVIII–XX centuries. The subject of this study is a process of “nationalization” of European classicism and building the basis for his version of national style. The focus of the author of various transformation/mutation associated with the use of the ideological and artistic classical heritage for formulating different versions of national style. This is accomplished using three periods of Russian history — the era of classicism as mainstream ideology and style of architecture: classicism (neoclassicism) 1770–1820, Neo-Classicism 1900–1910 and Soviet neoclassicism 1930–1950’s.


Keywords:

classicism, national style, Russian Archaic (Antiquity), neoclassicism, «romantic classicism», Soviet neoclassicism, national Romanism, Stalin’s Empire, «Gothic- Russian» style, pseudoGothic style, (neo) Naryshkin style.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Arkin D. E. Arkhitektura epokhi frantsuzskoy revolyutsii // Arkhitektura SSSR. 1934. ¹ 8. S. 60–68.
2. Arkin D. E. Klassitsizm i ampir v Moskve// Arkhitektura SSSR. 1935. ¹ 9. S. 82–89.
3. Arkhitektura stalinskoy epokhi. Opyt istoricheskogo osmysleniya / Sost. i otv. red. Yu. L. Kosenkova. M.: KomKniga, 2010. 496 s.
4. Borisova E., Sternin G. Russkiy neoklassitsizm. M.: Galart, 2002. 287 s.
5. Vishlenkova E. A. Vizual'noe narodovedenie imperii, ili «Uvidet' russkogo dano ne kazhdomu». M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2011. 384 s.
6. Vundram M. Palladio, 1508–1580. Zakony garmonii. M.: Art-rodnik, 2009. 95 s.
7. Gabrichevskiy A. Novoe oformlenie inter'erov istoricheskogo muzeya // Arkhitektura SSSR. 1938. ¹ 1. S. 75–79.
8. Evropeyskoe prosveshchenie i tsivilizatsiya Rossii. M.: Nauka, 2004. 356 s.
9. Ikonnikov A. V. Arkhitektura XX veka. Utopiya i real'nost': V 2 t. T. 1. M.: Progress-traditsiya, 2001. 655 s.
10. Il'in M. Russkaya natsional'naya arkhitektura i problemy russkogo stilya // Arkhitektura SSSR. 1945. ¹ 9. S. 31–33.
11. Kastel' R. «Problematizatsiya» kak sposob prochteniya istorii // Mishel' Fuko i Rossiya: Sb. st. SPb., 2001. S. 10–32.
12. Knabe G. S. Russkaya antichnost': Soderzhanie, rol' i sud'ba antichnogo naslediya v kul'ture Rossii. M.: Izd-vo RGGU, 2000. 238 s.
13. Kozhin N. A. Nekotorye cherty tvorchestva Bazhenova // Arkhitektura SSSR. 1937. ¹ 2. S. 12–17.
14. Kozhin N. A. Osnovy russkoy psevdogotiki XVIII v. M., 1927.
15. Kozhin N. A. Pamyatniki russkoy psevdogotiki sela Znamenki Tambovskoy gubernii. M., 1924.
16. Lisovskiy V. G. «Natsional'nyy stil'» v arkhitekture Rossii. M.: Sovpadenie, 2000. 416 s.
17. Nashchokina M. V. Antichnoe nasledie v russkoy arkhitekture Nikolaevskogo vremeni. Ego izuchenie i tvorcheskaya interpretatsiya. M.: Progress-traditsiya, 2011. 616 s.
18. Papernyy V. Kul'tura dva. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 1996. 382 s.
19. Pevzner N. Angliyskoe v angliyskim iskusstve. SPb.: Azbuka-klassika, 2004. 320 s.
20. Problemy natsional'noy arkhitektury sovetskogo vostoka // Arkhitektura SSSR. 1934. ¹ 8. S. 1–3.
21. Revzin G. I. Neoklassitsizm v russkoy arkhitekture nachala XX v. M., 1992. 168 s.
22. Sedov V. Neoklassika v moskovskoy arkhitekture 1920-kh gg. // Proekt klassika. 2006. ¹ 20. S. 163–177 (URL: http://www.projectclassica.ru/about/numbers/20_2006.htm).
23. Sokolova N. Problema stilya i khudozhestvennogo naslediya russkikh zodchikh // Arkhitektura SSSR. 1935. ¹ 6. S. 54–60.
24. Sdvizhkov D. Imperiya v napoleonovskom naryade: vospriyatie frantsuzskogo neoklassitsizma v Rossiyskoy imperii // Imperium inter pares: rol' transferov v istorii rossiyskoy imperii, 1700–1917. M., 2010. S. 67–104.
25. Turchin V. S. Aleksandr I i neoklassitsizm v Rossii. Stil' imperii ili imperiya kak stil'. M.: Zhiraf, 2001. 512 s.
26. Khmel'nitskiy D. Zodchiy Stalin. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2007. 304 s.
27. Fuko M. Arkheologiya znaniya. Kiev, 1994. 208 s.
28. Shchusev A. V. Arkhitektura sovetskogo vostoka // Arkhitektura SSSR. 1934. ¹ 8. S. 8–9