Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Ambartsumyan S.G. Information technologies within law: history, issues, opportunities

Abstract: The subject of this research is the use of information technologies within law. The article reviews the early stages of the conception of legal cybernetics, and presents the key problems and opportunities for future development of this branch of science. It examines both, the more simple forms of use of information technologies within law (for example, within the justice in order to simplify the paperwork process between the parties in a court proceeding), as well as the more complex issues (such as use of information technologies in making legally significant decisions, including court ruling). A special attention is given to the importance of development of such relevant problem as implementation of artificial intelligence within law. The author concludes that despite the current difficulties in development of legal cybernetics and information technologies within law, a considerable amount of progress has already been made, and the opportunities for further implementation of these technologies are rather great. The modern trend of the social development dictates the necessity to apply the information technologies into the law as into any other area of everyday life.


Keywords:

Law, legal cybernetics, information technologies, artificial intelligence, logic, law enforcement, artificial intelligence, computer, internet, communication, automation.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Taruffo M. (1998) Judicial Decisions and Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 6, 311–324.
2. Fabri M.; Langbroek P.M. (2000) The Challenge of Change for Judicial Systems, Developing a Public Administration Perspective, IOS Press OHMSHA: Amsterdam, Washington.
3. Fabri M.; Langbroek P.M. (2000) The Challenge of Change for Judicial Systems, Developing a Public Administration Perspective, IOS Press OHMSHA: Amsterdam, Washington.
4. Susskind, R (1999) The Challenge of the Information Society: Application of Advanced Technologies in Civil Litigation and Other Procedures.
5. Carnevali, D; Di Cocco M.C. (2001) An Innovation Process Embedded in a Strict Institutional Setting: ICT in Italian Judicial System. in M. Fabri, F. Contini, Justice and Technology in Europe. How ICT is Changing the Judicial Buisiness. Amsterdam. Kluwer Law International.
6. Chris Reed, Douglas Walton and Fabrizio Mecagno, Argument diagramming in logic, law and artificial intelligence, The Knowledge Engineering Review, 2007,vol.22:1,87-109,Cambridge University Press
7. Ephraim Nissan, Artificial Intelligence and Formalisms for Legal Evidence: An Introduction, Applied Artificial Intelligence, 18:185-229, 2004.
8. Douglas Walton, Argumentation Method for Artificial Intelligence in Law,Springer,Berlin,2005,270p
9. Berth,E.M. and Krabbe,E.C.W.,1982, From Axiom to Dialogue, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, NewYork
10. Poshkyavichus V.A., Kiberneticheskiy podkhod k pravu, Voprosy kibernetiki. Vypusk 40. Pravovaya Kibernetika. AN SSSR, M., Sov. radio,1977,S.38
11. Kerimov D.A., O stanovlenii i zadachakh pravovoy kibernetiki, Voprosy kibernetiki. Vypusk 40. Pravovaya Kibernetika. AN SSSR, M., Sov. radio,1977,C.21