Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Gerasimova, D.A. Ideological aspects of formation and implementation of the criminal law policy in the legal positions of the Renaissance thinkers.

Abstract: The goal of this article is to provide detailed analysis of the term “humanization of the criminal policy”, which is often used when characterizing the law and system of government of the European states in XVIII century. The author of this article studies the ideological sources for the formation of the key directions of the criminal law policy based on the current scientifi c approaches to the theory of legal policy and on the analysis of the works of the enlighteners in the sphere of criminal law. The author considers that the ideas of the reforms in the sphere of criminal law system, which were expressed by the thinkers of the Enlightenment epoch, are still important in the current legal reality, while they once have formed the basis for the scientifi c theory of criminal policy. The interpretation of the views of Charles Montesquieu and Cesare Beccaria from the point of view of key methods of implementation of the criminal policy has certain scientifi c value, and it allows the author to draw a conclusion that the ideas of penalization, de-penalization and differentiation of legal responsibility together with the forms of their implementation in the state policies of the European states in XVIII century provide for the humanization of the criminal law policy.


Keywords:

jurisprudence, morals, the Enlightenment epoch, the enlighteners, criminal policy, humanization, de-penalization, penalization, differentiation of criminal responsibility, history of legal teachings.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Vilenskii B.V. Sudebnaya reforma i kontrreforma v Rossii. Saratov: Privolzhskoe knizhnoe izdatel'stvo,
2. 1969. 400 s.
3. Vysochaishe utverzhdennoe mnenie Gosudarstvennogo soveta «O poryadke izdaniya Obshchego Nakaza sudebnym
4. ustanovleniyam i o distsiplinarnoi otvetstvennosti chinov sudebnogo vedomstva // PSZ RI. Sobr. III. T. V. ¹.
5. 2959.
6. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Kurskoi oblasti. F. 1. Op. 1. D. 1612.
7. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Orlovskoi oblasti. F. 580. St. 2. Op. 1. D. 1807.
8. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii. F. 109. Op. 3a. D. 210.
9. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii. F. 109. Op. 3a. D. 214.
10. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii. F. 109. Op. 3a. D. 237.
11. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii. F. 564. Op. 1. D. 528.
12. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii. F. 730. Op. 1. D. 1540.
13. Gosudarstvennyi arkhiv Rossiiskoi Federatsii. F. 730. Op. 1. D. 1541.
14. Deyatel'nost' Gosudarstvennogo soveta za vremya tsarstvovaniya Gosudarya Imperatora Aleksandra Aleksandrovicha.
15. 1 marta 1881 g. – 20 oktyabrya 1894 g. SPb.: Gosudarstvennaya tipografiya, 1900. 161 s.
16. Zhurnal soedinennykh departamentov zakonov i grazhdanskii del Gosudarstvennogo soveta o preobrazovanii
17. sudebnoi chasti v Rossii. SPb., 1862. 37 8 s.
18. Koni A. F. Mirovye sud'i // Sobranie sochinenii. T. 1. M., 1966. S. 288-330.
19. Lazarenko A. N. Ocherk osnovnykh nachal sudoustroistva Rossii i glavneishikh zapadnoevropeiskikh gosudarstv
20. za pyat'desyat let // Sudebnye ustavy 20 noyabrya 1864 g. za pyat'desyat let. T. 1. Pg., 1914. S. 401-489.
21. Lebedev K.N. Zapiski // Russkii arkhiv. 1911. ¹5. S.132-160.
22. Lonskaya S.V. Mirovaya yustitsiya v Rossii. Kaliningrad, 2000. 215 s.
23. Murav'ev N.V. O sudebnoi sluzhbe. M.: Tip. A.I. Mamontova i Ko, 1886. 58 s.
24. Nemytina M.V. Sud v Rossii: vtoraya polovina XIX – nachalo XX vv. Saratov: SYuI MVD RF, 1999. 256 s.
25. Otdel rukopisei Rossiiskoi gosudarstvennoi biblioteki. F. 230. ¹4394. Ed.khr.3.
26. Otdel rukopisei Rossiiskoi natsional'noi biblioteki. F. 600. D. 1490.
27. Otdel rukopisei Rossiiskoi natsional'noi biblioteki. F. 600. D. 1506.
28. Polovtsev A. A. Dnevnik gosudarstvennogo sekretarya: v 2 tt. T.1. M.: ZAO Tsentrpoligraf, 2005. 605 s.
29. Pustoroslev P. P. Pyatidesyatiletie nesmenyaemosti sudei v Rossiiskoi imperii. Yur'ev: tipografiya K.
30. Mattisena, 1915. 102 s.
31. Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi istoricheskii arkhiv. F. 1287. Op. 27. D. 863.
32. Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi istoricheskii arkhiv. F.1405. Op. 65. D. 3462.
33. Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi istoricheskii arkhiv. F. 1405. Op. 539. D. 28.
34. Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi istoricheskii arkhiv. F. 1405. Op. 539. D. 29.
35. Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi istoricheskii arkhiv. F. 1405. Op. 539. D. 603.
36. Ryzhov D. S. Vysshee distsiplinarnoe prisutstvie Pravitel'stvuyushchego Senata kak organ nadzora za sudebnymi
37. uchrezhdeniyami v poreformennoi Rossii // Pravo i politika. 2007. ¹9. S.110-114.
38. Sluchevskii V.K. Iz pervykh let zhizni Sudebnykh ustavov // Zhurnal ministerstva yustitsii. 1914. ¹9.
39. S.181-233.
40. Sudebnye ustavy 20 noyabrya 1864 goda s izlozheniem rassuzhdenii, na koikh oni osnovany. Ch. III. SPb.: Izd-vo
41. Gos. kantselyarii, 1867. 567 s.
42. Tregubov S.N. Samostoyatel'nost' suda // Zhurnal ministerstva yustitsii. 1905. ¹5. S. 3-36.
43. Foinitskii I. Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. T. 1. SPb.: Al'fa, 1996. 552 s.
44. Shavrov A. V. Nadzor i distsiplinarnaya otvetstvennost' v sudebnom vedomstve poreformennoi Rossii (1864-
45. 1917) // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1985. ¹12. S. 100-105.
46. Shibanov A. S. Nesmenyaemost' sudei v Rossii (1864-1917 gg.). Dis. … kand. yur. nauk. Saratov, 2001. 181 s.