Читать статью 'Проблемы сохранения международно-правового статуса озера Байкал в свете анализа практики исключения объектов из Списка всемирного наследия (часть 1)' в журнале Право и политика на сайте nbpublish.com
Рус Eng Перевести статью
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

Problems of preserving the international legal status of Lake Baikal in the light of the analysis of the practice of excluding objects from the World Heritage List (Part 1)

Kolobov Roman Yurievich

PhD in Law

Associate Professor of the Department of International Law and Comparative Jurisprudence of the Irkutsk State University Law Institute; Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law of the East Siberian Branch of the Russian State University of Justice; Head of the Fundamental Research Department of the Research Institute of Legal Protection of Lake Baikal of Irkutsk State University

664035; Russia, Irkutskaya oblast', g. Irkutsk, ul. Ivana Franko; 23a

roman.kolobov@gmail.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Ditsevich Yaroslava Borisovna

PhD in Law

Associate Professor, Department of Prosecutorial Oversight in Participation of the Prosecutor in Consideration of Civil and Arbitration Affairs, Irkutsk Law Insitute (branch) of the University of Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation

664035, Russia, Irkutskaya oblast', g. Irkutsk, ul. Shevtsova, 1

yaroslavadi@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Ganeva Ekaterina Olegovna

PhD in Law

Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law of the Irkutsk State University Law Institute, Coordinator of the Youth Research Center of the Research Institute of Legal Protection of Lake Baikal of Irkutsk State University

664082, Russia, Irkutskaya oblast', g. Irkutsk, ul. Ulan-Batorskaya, 10

kareva10@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Shornikov Dmitrii Vladimirovich

PhD in Law

Associate Professor, Head of the Department of International Law and Comparative Law of the Irkutsk State University Law Institute

664082, Russia, Irkutskaya oblast', g. Irkutsk, ul. Ulan-Batorskaya, 10

abirvalg35@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2022.6.38174

Review date:

29-05-2022


Publish date:

11-06-2022


Abstract: This research is the first part of the article, in which, based on the analysis of historical precedents, a study of the procedure for excluding UNESCO World Heritage sites from the corresponding World Heritage List is conducted. The authors highlight common problems in the protection of World Heritage sites, the interpolation of which in relation to such a World Natural heritage site as Lake Baikal creates prospects for preventing the occurrence of the most negative consequences. A detailed analysis of the difficulties in the conservation of World Heritage sites, which lead to the exclusion of objects from the World Heritage List, based on world experience, is proposed. In the work, one of the problems of preserving World Heritage sites, which served, in particular, as the main reason for the exclusion from the List of such an object as the Arabian Antelope Reserve, is called insufficient certainty, as well as insufficient clarity in establishing the boundaries of World Heritage sites. The authors substantiate this thesis and draw a conclusion about the importance of strict compliance by the participating countries with the norms formed in the main relevant international documents. In addition, it is noted that the exclusion of an object from the UNESCO World Heritage List may lead to the appearance of non-compliance of the object with the criteria of outstanding universal value.


Keywords: world heritage, arabian antelope reserve, environmental crime, environmental offenses, world heritage site, biological diversity, environmental protection, outstanding universal value, World Heritage List, UNESCO World Heritage Site
This article is automatically translated. You can find full text of article in Russian here.


References
1.
Konvenciya ob ohrane vsemirnogo kul'turnogo i prirodnogo naslediya [Convention for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (Paris, 16 November 1972)] // Sbornik mezhdunarodnyh dogovorov SSSR [USSR Treaty Collection], Issue XLIV, Moscow, 1990, pp. 496-506.
2.
Nasledie v opasnosti: YUNESKO i Minprirody sporyat o statuse Bajkala [Heritage in danger: UNESCO and the Ministry of Natural Resources argue about the status of Lake Baikal]. – URL: https://ulan.mk.ru/social/2021/08/13/nasledie-v-opasnosti-yunesko-i-minprirody-sporyat-o-statuse-baykala.html (accessed: 09 Maj 2022).
3.
YUNESKO mozhet vygnat' Bajkal iz spiska ob"ektov vsemirnogo naslediya [UNESCO may expel Baikal from the list of World Heritage sites]. – URL: https://www.babr24.com/irk/?IDE=215506 (accessed: 09 Maj 2022).
4.
URL: https://tayga.info/151962 (accessed: 09 Maj 2022).
5.
Zabavko R. A. Aktual'nye voprosy ohrany okruzhayushchej prirodnoj sredy i prirodnyh resursov v Rossii: otdel'nye itogi Goda ekologii v Rossii [Current issues of environmental protection and natural resources protection in Russia: some results of the Year of Ecology in Russia]// Voprosy rossijskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava [Questions of Russian and International Law], 2019, No 1В, pр. 309-316.
6.
Operational Guidelines for the World Heritage Committee. – URL: https://whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide77a.pdf (accessed: 09 Maj 2022).
7.
Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. – URL: https://whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide80.pdf (accessed: 09 Maj 2022).
8.
Decision 32 COM
9.
Discussion on Outstanding Universal Value. –URL: https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/1739 (accessed: 09 Maj 2022). 9.Decision 43 COM 8. Nomination Process. – URL: https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/7354 (accessed: 09 Maj 2022).
10.
World Heritage Nomination-Iucn Summary. 654: Jiddat Al Harasis and Adjoining Areas (Sultanate of Oman). – URL: https://whc.unesco.org/document/153962 (accessed: 09 Maj 2022).
11.
Decision CONF 003 XI. Inscription: Arabian Oryx Sanctuary (Oman). – URL: https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/3192/ (accessed: 09 Maj 2022).
12.
Decision CONF 204 IV.B.36. Arabian Oryx Sanctuary (Oman). URL: https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5711 (accessed: 09 Maj 2022).
13.
V emirate Abu-Dabi budet sozdan pervyj zapovednik aravijskih oriksov [The first reserve of Arabian oryx will be created in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi]. – URL: https://www.emirates.su/news/1187675560.shtml (accessed: 09 Maj 2022).
14.
Decision CONF 204 IV.B.30. Arabian Oryx Sanctuary (Oman). – URL: https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5578 (accessed: 09 Maj 2022).
15.
Decision CONF 201 VI.20. Arabian Oryx Sanctuary (Oman). – URL: https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/5477 (accessed: 09 Maj 2022).
16.
Decision 28 COM 15B.8. Arabian Oryx Sanctuary (Oman). – URL: https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/180 (accessed: 09 Maj 2022).
17.
Decision 30 COM 7B.10. State of Conservation (Arabian Oryx Sanctuary). – URL: https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/1093 (accessed: 09 Maj 2022).
18.
COM. World Heritage Committee Thirty first Session Christchurch, New Zealand 23 June – 2 July 2007. – URL: https://whc.unesco.org/archive/2007/whc07-31com-7be.pdf (accessed: 09 Maj 2022).
19.
Decision 31 COM 7B.11. State of conservation of World Heritage properties-Arabian Oryx Sanctuary. URL: https://whc.unesco.org/en/decisions/1392 (accessed: 09 Maj 2022).