Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1856,   Articles in work: 390 Declined articles: 397 
Library

Back to contents

Sociodynamics
Reference:

Tastes in music and art in the context of self-determination of youth

Kozlovskii Vladimir Vyacheslavovich

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, the department of Sociology of Culture and Communication, Saint Petersburg State University

190005, Russia, g. Saint Petersburg, ul. Ul. 7-Ya krasnoarmeiskaya, 25/14

v.kozlovskiy@socinst.ru
Tkachuk Dar'ya Vladimirovna

Scientific Associate, Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, branch of the Federal Scientific Research Sociological Center, Saint Petersburg, Russia

190005,, Russia, Saint Petersburg, g. Saint Petersburg, ul. Ul. 7-Ya krasnoarmeiskaya, 25/14

tkachuk.daria@gmail.com

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7144.2020.10.34036

Review date:

05-10-2020


Publish date:

10-11-2020


Abstract: The subject of this research is analysis of the impact of tastes in music and art upon self-determination of youth. The key problem is to identify the specificity of formation of personal preferences of youth in the process of music consumption in the context of modern cultural industries. The scale and mechanisms of the impact of music as a sociocultural factor of socialization, identification, cultural demarcation and, most importantly, social differentiation and cultural diversity are insufficiently studied. The problem of studying sociocultural capacity of tastes in music and art consists in poor perception for the sociological research on cultural determination of the practices of within and outside the intergenerational semantic (symbolic) distinction and unity within the youth environment. The goal is to search the methods for formation and representation of tastes in culture, and namely, in music and art as the elements comprising semantic and value structure of identity of a young person.  The core of the strategies for creating semantic and value structure in the course of sociocultural socialization of a person are music and art patterns that manifest in Russian youth born between 1987 and 1997 in relation to various musical genres, practices, performers and those with different tastes in music and art. Music alongside tastes in music in the context of self-determination of youth fulfill a function of worldview, behavioral and ideological reference points, an instrument for postulating new values, as well as reconsideration and of the established preferences, attitudes and patterns.


Keywords: cultural industries, Russian youth, value structure of personality, semantic structure of personality, personal self-determination, musical and artistic tastes, cultural patterns, music, identity, strategies of self-determination
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Sotsiologiya molodezhi. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar' / Otv. red. Yu.A. Zubok, V.I. Chuprov.-M.: Academia, 2008. 606 s.
2.
Zubok Yu.A., Chuprov V.I. Sovremennaya sotsiologiya molodezhi: izmenyayushchayasya real'nost' i novye teoreticheskie podkhody // Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya. 2017. 15. s. 12-48.
3.
Adorno T.V. Izbrannoe: Sotsiologiya muzyki. M.; SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 1998. 445 s.
4.
Bourdieu P. Distinction. A social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge Classics, 2010. 607 p.
5.
Peterson R.A., Kern R. Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore // American Sociological Review, 1996, 5 (1), Pp. 900-907.
6.
Gomart, E., & Hennion, A. (1999). A Sociology of Attachment: Music Amateurs, Drug Users. The Sociological Review, 47(1_suppl). Pp. 220247. [Electronic resource] doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.1999.tb03490.
7.
Hennion, A. (2007). Those Things That Hold Us Together: Taste and Sociology. Cultural Sociology, 1(1), pp. 97114. [Electronic resource] doi:10.1177/1749975507073923
8.
Bryson, B. (1996). Anything but heavy metal: Symbolic exclusion and musical dislikes. American sociological review, pp. 884-899.
9.
Lizardo, O., Skiles, S. (2015). Musical taste and patterns of symbolic exclusion in the United States 19932012: Generational dynamics of differentiation and continuity. Poetics, 53, pp. 9-21.
10.
Kollingvud Dzh. Printsipy iskusstva. / Sotsiologiya iskusstva. Khrestomatiya. Sost. Zhidkov V.S., Klyavina T.A. M.: Progress-traditsiya, 2010 g. 496 s.
11.
Borisova E.B. Molodezhnaya muzyka i sotsializiruyushchaya funktsiya SMI // Nauka televideniya. 2012. 9. [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/molodezhnaya-muzyka-i-sotsializiruyuschaya-funktsiya-smi (data obrashcheniya: 10.03.2020). s. 110-115.
12.
Leont'ev A.N. Deyatel'nost'. Soznanie. Lichnost'. 2-e izd. M.: Politizdat, 1977.-304 s.
13.
Kelli D. Teoriya lichnosti (teoriya lichnykh konstruktov). SPb.: Rech', 2000 . 249 s.
14.
Asmolov A.G. Psikhologiya lichnosti: kul'turno-istoricheskoe ponimanie razvitiya cheloveka. M.: Akademiya, Smysl, 2007. 528 c.
15.
Leont'ev D.A. Psikhologiya smysla: priroda, stroenie i dinamika smyslovoi real'nosti. 2-e, ispr. izd. M.: Smysl, 2003. 487 s.
16.
Pochtareva E.Yu. Tsennostno-smyslovaya sfera lichnosti: sushchnost', determinanty, mekhanizmy razvitiya // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. 2017. Vyp. 4. S. 563575.
17.
Shelekhova L.V., Panesh A.A. Struktura lichnostno-smyslovoi sfery // Kul'turnaya zhizn' Yuga Rossii. 5 (43). 2011. S. 34-37.
18.
DiMaggio, P., Useem M. The Arts in Education and Cultural Participation: The Social Role of Aesthetic Education and the Arts./ Journal of Aesthetic Education, vol. 14, no. 4, 1980. Pp. 5572.
19.
Kutsenko N.Yu. Gumanitarnaya kul'tura v protsesse sotsializatsii lichnosti // Vestnik KGU. 2008. 4. [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/gumanitarnaya-kultura-v-protsesse-sotsializatsii-lichnosti (data obrashcheniya: 30.03.2020).
20.
Kubyakin E.O. Sotsializatsiya rossiiskoi molodezhi v usloviyakh globalizatsii informatsionnogo prostranstva // Vlast'. 2011. 3. [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsializatsiya-rossiyskoy-molodezhi-v-usloviyah-globalizatsii-informatsionnogo-prostranstva (data obrashcheniya: 02.03.2020).
21.
Gromakov A.I. Rok-muzyka kak keis muzykal'noi sotsializatsii // Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. 2014. 1. [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/rok-muzyka-kak-keys-muzykalnoy-sotsializatsii (data obrashcheniya: 11.03.2020).
22.
Lamont M., Pendergrass S., Pachucki M. Symbolic boundaries //International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. 2001. V.
23.
Pp. 15341-47. 23. Khezmondalsh D. Kul'turnye industrii M.: Izdatel'skii dom VShE, 2014. 456 s.
24.
Martynenko N. Spetsifika iskusstva i ego sotsializiruyushchnee vozdeistvie na lichnost' // Voprosy kul'turologii, 10, 2007. s. 47-50.
25.
Lewis G. H. (1975) Cultural socialization and the development of taste cultures and culture classes in American popular music: Existing evidence and proposed research directions, Popular Music and Society, 4:4. pp. 226-241, [Electronic resource] DOI:10.1080/03007767508591089