Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1919,   Articles in work: 328 Declined articles: 648 
Library

Back to contents

Trends and management
Reference:

Digital depersonalization of scientific results as an unaccounted risk of modernization of the system of scientific management in the Russian Federation
Yanik Andrey Aleksandrovich

PhD in Technical Science

Andrey A. Yanik
 
Leading Researcher, the Institute of Socio-Political Research, the Russian Academy of Sciences
 

119333, Russia, Gorod federal'nogo znacheniya Moskva, g. Moscow, ul. Fotievoi, 6, korp.1, of. 1

cpi_2002_1@yahoo.co.uk
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0730.2019.4.31916

Review date:

08-01-2020


Publish date:

22-01-2020


Abstract.

This work explores number of unaccounted risks that immerge in the course of modernization of state management of scientific development in Russia, under the influence of a complex of circumstances of various origin. It is demonstrated that stimulation of transfer of scientific results into international citation systems, allowing solution of the current tasks of measurement and assessment of the efficiency of scientific work, is one of the links in the chain of greater process – annexation of countries to the global added value chains in the area of production and use of knowledge. Broader context reveals that digital depersonalization of scientific results in combination with the impossibility of legal protection of the ideas, theories and discoveries contained in the articles, can potentially establish a country in within the less profitable segment of the chain with maximal transaction costs. Objective downside to the multidimensional view of the global context, in which the reform of Russian science is taking place, is that it does not allow forecasting full spectrum of possible consequences at the early stages. It would seem that constant analysis of the multilevel effects, caused by the current management practice, is necessary not only for improving the quality of local solutions, but also for correction of strategies.

Keywords: Adaptive Governance, Performance evaluation, Intellectual Rights, Science Governance, Science Policy, Innovations, Science, Russia, Citation Index, Global Value Chain
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Gorts A. Znanie, stoimost' i kapital. K kritike ekonomiki znanii // Logos. 2007. № 4 (61). S. 5-63.
2.
Gorts A. Nematerial'noe. Znanie, stoimost' i kapital. M.: Izdatel'skii dom Gosudarstvennogo universiteta Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2010. - 208 s.
3.
Pol're B. Kognitivnyi kapitalizm na marshe // Politicheskii zhurnal. 2008. № 2. S. 66-72.
4.
Ocherk o nauchnom proletariate. Chast' 1 // Newsland. 27 dekabrya 2019 g. URL: https://newsland.com/user/4297817092/content/ocherk-o-nauchnom-proletariate-chast-1/6977373 (data obrashcheniya: 28.12.2019).
5.
Price D. J. de S. Little science, big science… and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986. – 301 p.
6.
Price D. J. de S. Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963. - 119 p.
7.
Weinberg A.M. Impact of Large-Scale Science on the United States // Science. 1961. Vol. 134, №3473. P. 161-164/
8.
Yanik A.A. Kosmicheskie programmy i problemy otsenki sotsietal'nogo vozdeistviya proektov Big Science // Issledovaniya kosmosa. 2017. № 3. S. 216-227.
9.
Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research / Eds. P. Galison, B. Hevly. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1992. – 392 p/
10.
Edgerton D. The ‘Haldane Principle’ and other invented traditions in science policy // UK Universities Partnership «History & Policy» Policy Paper. 2009. July 2.
11.
Yanik A. A., Popova S. M. Otsenochnye metody v upravlenii gosudarstvennym sektorom nauki: opyt Soedinennogo Korolevstva // Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik (Elektronnyi zhurnal). 2014. № 45. S. 110-147.
12.
Garfield E. Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas // Science. 1955. Vol. 122. № 3159. P. 108–111.
13.
Acquisition of the Thomson Reuters Intellectual Property and Science Business by Onex and Baring Asia Completed // Cision PR Newswire. 2016. October 3.
14.
Nalimov V.V., Mul'chenko Z.M. Naukometriya. Izuchenie razvitiya nauki kak informatsionnogo protsessa. M.: Nauka, 1969. – 192 s/
15.
Nalimov V.V. Kolichestvennye metody issledovaniya protsessa razvitiya nauki // Voprosy filosofii. 1966. № 12. S. 38–47.
16.
Prikaz Ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 12 dekabrya 2016 g. № 1586 (red. ot 12.02.2018) URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_216187/3b8fbcccbb347b5cbe7153fb6da495af10fe2263/ (data obrashcheniya: 12.12.2019).
17.
Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 7 maya 2012 g. № 599 «O merakh po realizatsii gosudarstvennoi politiki v oblasti obrazovaniya i nauki» // SZ RF, 2012. № 19. St. 2336/
18.
Minobrnauki predlagaet izmenit' trebovaniya dlya polucheniya uchenykh stepenei // TASS. 2019. 2 aprelya; Rossiiskim uchenym pridetsya bol'she publikovat'sya v zarubezhnykh nauchnykh zhurnalakh // Novosti Ministerstva nauki i vysshego obrazovaniya RF. 2019. 18 yanvarya.
19.
Mochalov A. N. Osobennosti napisaniya statei po yuridicheskim naukam, ili pochemu bol'shinstvo publikatsii rossiiskikh pravovedov ne interesno mezhdunarodnoi auditorii // Nauchnoe izdanie mezhdunarodnogo urovnya – 2018: redaktsionnaya politika, otkrytyi dostup, nauchnye kommunikatsii: materialy 7-i mezhdunarod. nauch.-prakt. konf., Moskva, 24–27 aprelya 2018 g. M.: OOO «Vashe tsifrovoe izdatel'stvo», 2018. S. 115–123.
20.
Schmoch U. The Informative Value of International University Rankings: Some Methodological Remarks // Incentives and Performance: Governance of Research Organizations / Welpe, I.M., Wollersheim, J., Ringelhan, S., Osterloh, M. (Eds.). Springer, 2015. Pp. 141-154.
21.
W3C Strategic Highlights. October 2018. URL: https://www.w3.org/2018/10/w3c-highlights/ (data obrashcheniya: 12.12.2019).
22.
GOST R 7.0.10-2010 (ISO 15836:2003). Sistema standartov po informatsii, bibliotechnomu i izdatel'skomu delu. “Nabor elementov metadannykh «Dublinskoe yadro»”. Utverzhden i vveden v deistvie prikazom Federal'nogo agentstva po tekhnicheskomu regulirovaniyu i metrologii ot 9 noyabrya 2010 g. № 347-st. URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200084835 (data obrashcheniya: 12.12.2019).
23.
GOST R ISO 26324-2015. Sistema standartov po informatsii, bibliotechnomu i izdatel'skomu delu. «Sistema diskretnykh identifikatorov ob''ekta». Utverzhden i vveden v deistvie prikazom Federal'nogo agentstva po tekhnicheskomu regulirovaniyu i metrologii ot 11 noyabrya 2015 g. № 1750-st. URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200126925 (data obrashcheniya: 12.12.2019).
24.
Clarivate Analytics: «Leading provider of proprietary and comprehensive high value content, analytics, professional services and workflow solutions that enable users to discover, protect and commercialize their innovations». Barring Private Equity Asia. URL: http://www.bpeasia.com/private-equity/our-portfolio/(data obrashcheniya: 12.12.2019).
25.
Evstigneeva G.A. Natsional'naya i tsentralizovannaya podpiska na zarubezhnye indeksnye i polnotekstovye nauchnye resursy. 2018-2019. URL: benran.ru/SEM/sem_20_03_2019/prezent.ppt (data obrashcheniya: 12.12.2019).
26.
Clarivate Analytics Reports Third Quarter 2019 Results. URL: https://clarivate.com/news/clarivate-analytics-reports-third-quarter-2019-results/ (data obrashcheniya: 12.12.2019).
27.
Investor Relations // Clarivate Analytics. URL: http://ir.clarivate.com/(data obrashcheniya: 12.12.2019)/
28.
Salitskaya E.A. O probleme neokhranyaemogo soderzhaniya nauchnogo proizvedeniya, ili nuzhna li «sobstvennost'» na idei // Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. 2019. № 89 (10). S.1003-1011.
29.
Vsemirnaya konventsiya ob avtorskom prave (zaklyuchena v g. Zheneve 6 sentyabrya 1952 g.) (vmeste so «Statusom Vsemirnoi konventsii ob avtorskom prave (Zheneva, 6 sentyabrya 1952 g.)» (red. ot 26.04.2007)) // SP SSSR. 1973. № 24. St. 139.
30.
Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii (chast' chetvertaya) ot 18 dekabrya 2006 g. № 230-FZ (red. ot 23.05.2018) // SZ RF. 2006. № 52 (1 ch.). St. 5496.
31.
Zakon Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 9 iyulya 1993 g. № 5351-1 (red. ot 20.07.2004) «Ob avtorskom prave i smezhnykh pravakh» (utratil silu) // Vedomosti SND i VS RF.1993. № 32. St. 1242.
32.
Shtennikov V.N., Belyaeva I. A. Avtorskoe pravo i nauchnye proizvedeniya // Innovatsii. 2007. № 6. S. 82-85.
33.
Ivanova N.N., Valiullin R., Pivnev E. V., Lyapina I.A. Sovremennyi vzglyad na ob''ekty avtorskogo prava // Yuridicheskie nauki: problemy i perspektivy: materialy IV Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (g. Kazan', mai 2016 g.). Kazan': Buk, 2016. S. 170-172.
34.
GOST R 55385-2012. «Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Nauchnye proizvedeniya». Utverzhden i vveden v deistvie prikazom Federal'nogo agentstva po tekhnicheskomu regulirovaniyu i metrologii ot 27 dekabrya 2012 g. № 2086-st. URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200119669 (data obrashcheniya: 12.12.2019).
35.
Khokhlov A.R. Vo vsem mire idut ochen' ser'eznye izmeneniya v sfere izdaniya nauchnykh zhurnalov // Indicator.ru. 2019. 8 aprelya.
36.
Mirskikh I.Yu., Mingaleva Zh.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie prav na rezul'taty intellektual'noi deyatel'nosti v Rossii i za rubezhom // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. 2015. № 3 (29). S. 62-71.
37.
GOST R 58086-2018. «Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Raspredelenie intellektual'nykh prav mezhdu zakazchikom, ispolnitelem i avtorom na okhranyaemye rezul'taty intellektual'noi deyatel'nosti, sozdavaemye i/ili ispol'zuemye pri vypolnenii nauchno-issledovatel'skikh, opytno-konstruktorskikh, tekhnologicheskikh i proizvodstvennykh rabot». Utverzhden i vveden v deistvie prikazom Federal'nogo agentstva po tekhnicheskomu regulirovaniyu i metrologii ot 13 marta 2018 g. № 131-st. URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200158656 (data obrashcheniya: 12.12.2019).
38.
Slobodyan S.A. O priznakakh ob''ekta avtorskogo prava // Khozyaistvo i pravo (prilozhenie). 2009. № 7. S. 3-11. URL: http://www.hozpravo.ru/assets/files/pdf/2009-07-p.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.12.2019).
39.
Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice / Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom (Eds.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2006. – 382 p.
40.
Bouter L. Knowledge as a common good: the societal relevance of scientific research // Higher Education Management and Policy. 2010. Vol. 22. Issue 1. Pp. 119-133. URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-v22-art8-en (data obrashcheniya: 12.12.2019)/
41.
Medvedev S.A., Tomashov I.A. Znanie i obrazovanie kak global'nye obshchestvennye blaga // Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii: obrazovanie, nauka, novaya ekonomika. 2009. T. 4. Vyp. 2. S. 121-125.