Читать статью 'Селективная модерация в условиях виртуальной публичной сферы' в журнале Социодинамика на сайте nbpublish.com
Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1891,   Articles in work: 358 Declined articles: 493 
Library

Back to contents

Sociodynamics
Reference:

Selective moderation in the conditions of virtual public sphere

Martyanov Denis

PhD in Politics

Assistant professor, the department of political institutions and applied political research, Saint Petersburg State University

191124, Russia, Sankt-Peterburg, g. Saint Petersburg, ul. Ul. Smol'nogo, 1/3, 7-i pod''ezd

dsmartyanov@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Martianova Natalia Aleksandrovna

PhD in Sociology

Docent, the department of History and Theory of Sociology, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia

191186, Russia, g. Saint Petersburg, ul. Naberezhnaya Reki Moiki, 48

nmart@bk.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7144.2019.12.31759

Review date:

15-12-2019


Publish date:

22-12-2019


Abstract.

A trend away from the traditional media and fall of the era of television augments power of the Internet as a factor of sociopolitical communication. The subject of this article is the selective moderation in the ideologized and institutional virtual communities of the social network “Vkontakte”. Special attention is given to the question of which of the two ideal types – “public sphere” or “echo-chamber” communication in the Russian social networks suits the most. The object of this study is the virtual public sphere. The authors examine such aspects as the conceptualization of public sphere, categories of counter-public spheres, echo-chambers and “safe spots”. The field experiment carried out in 115 virtual communities became the main method for this research. Supplementary became the methods of observation, discourse analysis and network, which allowed conducting classification of the selected resources. The scientific novelty consists in the description of specificity of moderation of virtual communities in accordance with the criteria of prevalent ideological discourse. The conclusion is made that the communication platform of the politicized communities in the social network “Vkontakte” is being moderated; however, in majority of case, such moderation does not imply total exclusion of the critically-oriented users from the discussion. At the same time, the selectiveness of moderation is evident, since blocking of critics is more noticeable than blocking of adepts of the communities.

Keywords: Internet governance, safe places, virtual community, moderation, ideological segregation, echo chamber, public sphere, selective moderation, Vkontakte, social networks
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Balashov A. N. . Pravovoe regulirovanie Internet-otnoshenii: osnovnye problemy i praktika realizatsii v Rossii // Srednerusskii vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk, 2016. № 11 (2). S. 113-118.
2.
Bodrunova S.S. Kontseptsiya publichnoi sfery i mediakraticheskaya teoriya: poisk tochek soprikosnoveniya // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noi antropologii. 2011. T. XIV. № 1(54). S. 110-132.
3.
Bykov I. A. Upravlenie Internetom kak odna iz problem sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii // Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS, T. 4, № 2, 2008, S. 164-174.
4.
Kurbaliiya I. Upravlenie Internetom / I. Kurbaliiya; Koordinatsionnyi tsentr natsional'nogo domena seti Internet. M., 2010. 208 s.
5.
Fu, K. (2013) Assessing Censorship on Microblogs in China: Discriminatory Keyword Analysis and the Real-Name Registration Policy. IEEE internet computing. Vol. 17. Issue 3. Pp. 42-50. DOI:10.1109/MIC.2013.28
6.
Gibson, A. (2019). Free Speech and Safe Spaces: How Moderation Policies Shape Online Discussion Spaces. Social Media + Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119832588
7.
Habermas J. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, 1996.
8.
Habermas J. The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedic Article // New German Critique. 1974. Vol. 3. P. 49.
9.
Harsin J. (2017). Trump l’Œil: Is Trump’s Post-truth Communication Translatable? Contemporary French and Francophone Studies. 21(5). Pp. 512–522.
10.
Hussam H., Maaz M, Fareed Z. Rishab N. (2019). To Act or React: Investigating Proactive Strategies For Online Community Moderation. // https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.11932
11.
Langvardt, K. (2018) Regulating Online Content Moderation. Georgetown Law Journal, June 2018, Vol. 106, Issue 5. p. 1353
12.
Negt O., Kluge A. (1993) Public sphere and experience : toward an analysis of the bourgeois and proletarian public sphere. Mineapolis. University of Minnesota Press.
13.
Suh K.-S., Lee, S., Suh, E.-K., Lee, H., Lee, J. (2018) Online Comment Moderation Policies for Deliberative Discussion–Seed Comments and Identifiability, Journal of the Association for Information Systems: Vol. 19: Iss. 3, Article 2. P. 182-208. // https://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol19/iss3/2
14.
Yun G. W., Park S,-Y, Holody K., Yoon K. S., Xie S. (2013) Selective Moderation, Selective Responding, and Balkanization of the Blogosphere: A Field Experiment, Media Psychology, 16:3, 295-317, DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2012.75946