Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2065,   Articles in work: 293 Declined articles: 786 
Library

Back to contents

World Politics
Reference:

Ideology- and value-based factor in Turkic post-Soviet states
Avatkov Vladimir Alekseevich

PhD in Politics

Senior Scientific Associate, National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Docent, the department of International Relations, Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation; Professor, State Academic University for the Humanities

117997, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Profsoyuznaya, 23

avatkov.v@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8671.2019.4.31235

Review date:

02-11-2019


Review date:

02-11-2019


Publish date:

04-11-2019


Abstract.

The article is aimed at defining the ideology and value-based principles in Turkic post-Soviet states. Particularly, the author considers the states of Central Asia and Azerbaijan. The author proceeds from the fact that after the collapse of the USSR, these states initiated self-identification processes. Therefore, at the present moment, it is important to trace back the principles of the ideology- and value-based factor in the foreign policy of the states of Central Asia and Azerbaijan. The author gives special attention to the analysis of official documents reflecting the foreign policy course of the post-Soviet states containing the main ideas of national identity. Analyzing foreign policy documents of the states, the author emphasizes that, in basic terms, western-oriented narratives can be traced, transformed according to the national specificity of Turkic states.
Foreign policy ideology of the states is based on the aspiration to become more sovereign and independent of external influence.
It’s important to understand that Turkey has ideological influence on Turkic people of the post-Soviet political space, and it also affects the interrelations between Russia, Turkey, and Azerbaijan. The author also notes the significance of the Turkic factor in Russia’s foreign policy in the context of cooperation. 
 

Keywords: ideology, foreign policy concepts, foreign policy, national identity, post-soviet space, ideas, values, culture, traditions, international cooperation
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Zvyagel'skaya I. D. Islamskoe vozrozhdenie v Tsentral'noi Azii // Vostochnaya analitika. 2011. №6. S. 475–485.
2.
Abashin S. N. Islamskii vyzov idee natsii? Nekotorye soobrazheniya na primere Tsentral'noi Azii // Rossiya i musul'manskii mir. 2016. № 3 (285). S. 73–85.
3.
Kazantsev A. Mnogovektornost' vneshnei politiki i geopoliticheskaya neopredelennost' respublik Tsentral'noi Azii // Rossiya i musul'manskii mir. 2011. №10. S. 65–81.
4.
Laryuel' M. Vneshnyaya politika i identichnost' v Tsentral'noi Azii // Pro et Contra. 2013. S. 6–20.
5.
Plotnikov D. S. Konstruirovanie istoricheskogo proshlogo v gosudarstvakh Tsentral'noi Azii v kontekste vystraivaniya vzaimootnoshenii s Rossiei na sovremennom etape // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. 2016. №2. S. 156–167.
6.
Malysheva D. B. Politicheskie protsessy v postsovetskoi Tsentral'noi Azii // Kontury global'nykh transformatsii: politika, ekonomika, pravo. T. 11. № 3. C. 36–52.
7.
Mirzazade L. Tseli vneshnei politiki Azerbaidzhana // Sovremennye gumanitarnye issledovaniya. 2010. № 3. S. 90–95.
8.
Kontseptsiya natsional'noi bezopasnosti Azerbaidzhanskoi respubliki ot 23 maya 2007 g. № 2198 // National security concept of the Republic of Azerbaijan.URL: http://eurasian-defence.ru/?q=node/30535 (data obrashcheniya: 23.05.2007)
9.
Mamed''yarov E. Vneshnepoliticheskaya strategiya Azerbaidzhana osnovana na natsional'nykh interesakh i sootvetstvuet vyzovam vremeni // Politika. 2017. № 5 (89). S.16–25.
10.
Nazarbaev N.A. Strategiya stanovleniya i razvitiya Kazakhstana kak suverennogo gosudarstva 1992 g. URL: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=30006969#pos=7;-55
11.
Faizova R. S. Ideya evraziistva v politike Respubliki Kazakhstan: teoriya i praktika // Mir (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie). 2011. № 7. S. 42–45.
12.
Nursultan Nazarbaev rasskazal o svoem videnii Evraziiskogo soyuza. URL: http://nsi-press.ru/2011/10/nursultan-nazarbaev-rasskazal-o-svoem-videnii-evrazijjskogo-soyuza/ (data obrashcheniya: 26.10.2011)
13.
Kontseptsiya stanovleniya istoricheskogo soznaniya v Respublike Kazakhstan // Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung. URL: http://daz.asia/ru/kontseptsiya-stanovleniya-istoricheskogo/ (data obrashcheniya: 12.12.2013)
14.
Koval'skaya S. I. Rol' pervogo prezidenta v razrabotke kontseptsii po formirovaniyu istoricheskogo samosoznaniya natsii. Izd-vo Karagandinskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2016. 116 s.
15.
O Kontseptsii vneshnei politiki Respubliki Kazakhstan na 2014-2020 g. Ukaz Prezidenta Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 21 yanvarya 2014 goda № 741. URL: http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/U1400000741 (data obrashcheniya: 21.01.2014)
16.
Dorozhkin Yu. N., Igbaev R. B. Tendentsii retraditsionalizatsii v sovremennoi politicheskoi sisteme respubliki Kazakhstan // Vestnik VEGU. 2009. №4 (42) 29. S. 111–120.
17.
Strategiya deistvii po pyati prioritetnym napravleniyam razvitiya Respubliki Uzbekistan v 2017-2021 g. URL: http://strategy.regulation.gov.uz/ru/document/2
18.
Ubaidulaeva R. A. Dukhovno-nravstvennye tsennosti grazhdan Uzbekistana // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2010. № 1. C. 47–57.
19.
OON prinyala Rezolyutsiyu «2021 god – Mezhdunarodnyi god mira i doveriya», initsiirovannaya Prezidentom Turkmenistana. URL: https://arzuw.news/10887/oon-prinyala-rezolyuciyu-2021-god-mezhdunarodnyy-god-mira-i-doveriya-iniciirovannaya-prezidentom-turkmenistana.html (data obrashcheniya: 17.09.2019)
20.
Kalimova S. Kh. Dialog kul'tur v integratsionnykh protsessakh v Tsentral'noi Azii // Vestnik KRSU. 2017. T. 17. № 11. 161 s.
21.
Kontseptsiya vneshnei politiki Kyrgyzskoi Respubliki. URL: Rezhim dostupa: http://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/act/view/ru-ru/430045 (data obrashcheniya: 11.03.2019)
22.
Bostonkulova M. T. Kontseptsiya vneshnei politiki i politicheskaya bezopasnost' // Izvestiya VUZov Kyrgyzstana. 2015. №4. S. 207–209.
23.
Aknazarova A. A. Natsional'naya ideologiya Kyrgyzstana v kontakte evraziiskoi integratsii // Vestnik KRSU. 2015. T. 15. № 2 S. 22–25.
24.
Nadein-Raevskii V.A. Kritika sovremennogo pantyurkizma: avtoreferat dis. kandidata filosofskikh nauk: 09.00.02 // AN SSSR. In-t filosofii. M:, 1989. 18 s.
25.
Druzhilovskii S. B. Turtsiya: privychka upravlyat' // Rossiya v global'noi politike. 2005. T.3 № 6. URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/number/n_5965 (data obrashcheniya: 13.12.2005)
26.
Nadein-Raevskii V. A. Pantyurkizm: ot Osmanskoi imperii do nashikh dnei i sud'by Turtsii, Armenii i Rossii – M.: Russkaya panorama, 2018. 362 s.
27.
Avatkov V. A. Neoosmanizm. Bazovaya ideologema i geostrategiya Turtsii // Svobodnaya mysl'. 2014. № 3. S. 71–78.
28.
Avatkov V. A. Ideino-tsennostnyi faktor vo vneshnei politike Turtsii // Vestnik MGIMO. 2019. T.12. № 4. S.113–129.
29.
Tashtemkhanova R., Bokova B. Publichnaya diplomatiya Turtsii v stranakh Tsentral'noi Azii (1991-2018 gg.) // Bulletin d'EUROTALENT-FIDJIP. 2019. № 1, S.5–11.
30.
Mankoff D. Politika SShA v Tsentral'noi Azii posle 2014 goda // Pro et Contra. 2013. №1-2 (58). S. 41-57.
31.
Anashkina E.B. Rol' postsovetskogo prostranstva vo vneshnei politike SShA // SShA i Kanada: ekonomika, politika, kul'tura. 2015. № 6 (546). S. 19-34.
32.
Olkott M. Gosudarstva Tsentral'noi Azii idut svoim putem // Rossiya i musul'manskii mir. 2014. №4 (262). S. 57-68.
33.
Kontseptsiya vneshnei politiki Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 30.11.2016 g. // Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 30.11.2016 g. № 640.