Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2065,   Articles in work: 293 Declined articles: 786 
Library

Back to contents

Sociodynamics
Reference:

Legal norms in the context of sociocultural transformations: philosophical-culturological analysis
Alimova Yuliya Nikolaevna

PhD in Philosophy

Postgraduate student, the department of Philosophy, Moscow State Institute of International Relations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation

119571, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Prospekt Vernadskogo, 76, of. 4105

ad_personam@bk.ru

 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7144.2019.12.31035

Review date:

11-10-2019


Review date:

12-10-2019


Publish date:

20-10-2019


Abstract.

The goal of this work is the analysis of interaction between the key forms of existence of social and legal norms. The subject of this research is the dynamics of development of the legal norms depending on the frames of sociocultural context, reflecting in public consciousness the priority of irrational (myth) and rational (logos) spatio-temporal perceptions. In such context, myth and logos are viewed as the fundamentally different methods of storage and transmission of the socially important information, which allow forming worldview frames of the rational and irrational mindsets. Methodology is based in the cultural-philosophical analysis for comparing the two main types of legal consciousness, law enforcement and lawmaking. In the course of juxtaposing the modern forms of “mythological” (customary law) and “rational” (positive law) levels of the existence of law, the author determines the peculiarities of their interaction using the example of the phenomenon of “archaization of law”; as well as demonstrates the boundaries of this phenomenon in the context of modern sociocultural transformations. The results of the conducted research became the conclusions important for specification of boundaries of the permissible interpretations in situation when the norms of customary law collide with the norms of positive law. In such case, the law enforcement practices face a dilemma: whether the reference to a custom in case of unlawful actions is a mitigating factor or aggravating factor. The scientific novelty consists in establishing worldview framework of “archaization of law”, and determining correlation of this question with the philosophical problem of the universal, peculiar and singular (and thus, with the concept of “international law”). The author substantiates the conclusion on the dual character of alignment of the values of positive law with the custom and tradition.

Keywords: archaization of law, dynamics of law development, legal rules, sociocultural transformations, value-based frames, hilosophy of culture, myth, logos, traditional law, positive law
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Mikhailov A.M. Pravovaya kul'tura i pravovaya ideologiya // Tendentsii razvitiya prava v sotsiokul'turnom prostranstve. Zhidkovskie chteniya. Materialy vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii 24-25 marta 2017 goda. Otv. red. M.V. Nemytina. M.: RUDN, 2018. S. 78-85.
2.
Legoida V.R. Doverie k pravu kak kul'turfilosofskaya problema: k voprosu ob istochnikakh i osnovaniyakh formal'nykh sotsial'nykh regulyatorov // Kontsept: filosofiya, religiya, kul'tura. 2017. 4. S. 25-32.
3.
Shestak V.A. Novelly sovremennoi praktiki primeneniya sudami norm ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva, reglamentiruyushchikh poryadok razresheniya voprosov podgotovitel'nogo kharaktera // Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo. 2018.
4.
S. 36-41. 4.Tolstopyatenko G.P. Shkola sravnitel'nogo, zarubezhnogo i otechestvennogo konstitutsionnogo (gosudarstvennogo) prava MGIMO // Aktual'nye problemy sravnitel'nogo, zarubezhnogo i rossiiskogo konstitutsionnogo prava. M., 2017. S. 6-23.
5.
Nikolaeva Y.V., Grimalskaya S.A., Petrosyants D.V., Zulfugarzade T.E., Maystrovich E.V., Shestak V.A. Philosophical view of multiculturalism in modern European cinematography // European Journal of Science and Theology. 2018. T. 14.
6.
P. 205-214. 6.Khabermas Yu. Filosofskiĭ spor vokrug idei demokratii // Khabermas Yu. Demokratiya. Razum. Nravstvennost'. M.: Academia, 1995. 245 s.
7.
Khabermas Yu. Moral'noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe deĭstvie / Per. s nem. pod red. D.V. Sklyadneva, poslesl. B.V. Markova. SPb.: Nauka, 2000. 380 s.
8.
Vakhshtain V.S. Teoriya freimov kak instrument sotsiologicheskogo analiza povsednevnogo mira: dis. na soisk. uch. st. kand. sots. nauk: 22.00.01 teoriya, metodologiya i istoriya sotsiologii. M.: VShE, 2007. 168 s.
9.
Sukhonosova S.V. Teoriya freimov: vozmozhnosti issledovaniya povsednevnosti // Chelovek v mire kul'tury. 2012. 2. S. 29-34.
10.
Dubossarskaya M.L. Svoi-chuzhoi-drugoi: k postanovke problemy // Nauka. Innovatsii. Tekhnologii. 2008. 1. S. 167174.
11.
Glagolev V.S. Religiozno-eticheskoe napolnenie obrazov svoi i chuzhoi v dinamike politicheskoi kon''yunkturnosti // Dialog kul'tur i partnerstvo tsivilizatsii. SPb.: SPbGUP, 2014. S. 362365.
12.
Makovskaya A.A. Reforma dogovornogo prava vo Frantsii. Novye polozheniya Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Frantsii // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2016. 8. S. 76-101.
13.
Alimova Yu.N. Paradigmal'nyi podkhod v pravoponimanii: kul'turfilosofskie osnovaniya i prakticheskie sledstviya // Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. 2017. 7 (81). S. 19-23.
14.
UK RF Stat'ya 6. Printsip spravedlivosti // "Ugolovnyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii" ot 13.06.1996 N 63-FZ (red. ot 02.08.2019). URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_10699/b6cd84836e74cea492431160b5fa238b1b8f84c9/ (data obrashcheniya 02.06.2019).
15.
Nersesyants V.S. Filosofiya prava: uchebnik dlya vuzov. M.: NORMA, 2013. 835 s.
16.
Silant'eva M.V. Tsennostnye lekala sovremennoi kul'tury: religiya, pravo, moral' // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. 2018. 2 (28). S. 46-53.
17.
Przhilenskiĭ V.I. Yuridicheskoe poznanie i pravoprimenitel'nye praktiki v kontekste neklassicheskoĭ epistemologii // Voprosy filosofii. 2015. 8. S. 4252.
18.
Shipovalova L.V. Ob''ektivnost': put' ot samo soboi razumeyushchegosya k ochevidnomu // Vestnik SPbGU. Seriya 17: Filosofiya. Konfliktologiya. Kul'turologiya. Religiovedenie. 2015. 2. S. 46-52.
19.
UK RF Glava 2. Deistvie ugolovnogo zakona vo vremeni i v prostranstve // "Ugolovnyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii" ot 13.06.1996 N 63-FZ (red. ot 02.08.2019). URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_10699/ebfd33776a8f3491458afb9c525e0799ed3557b8/ (data obrashcheniya 02.06.2019).
20.
UK RF Stat'ya 9. Deistvie ugolovnogo zakona vo vremeni // "Ugolovnyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii" ot 13.06.1996 N 63-FZ (red. ot 02.08.2019). URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_10699/ac18caeb0eee735b4e56cd3a734a5d718dbc174f/ (data obrashcheniya 02.06.2019).
21.
Bart R. Mifologii / Per. S. Zenkin. M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2019. 351 s.
22.
Kulikova T.V. Filosofiya granitsy v kontekste gumanitarnogo poznaniya // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2012. 1-3. S. 47-54.
23.
Ishchenko E.N. Sovremennyi filosofskii diskurs: prostranstvo i granitsy // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2003. 2. S. 195-209.
24.
Khachaturyan V.M. Dialog s arkhaikoi // Chelovek. 2006. 6. S. 48-51.
25.
Khachaturyan V.M. Rol' arkhaizuyushchikh tendentsii v perekhodnye epokhi // Tsivilizatsii. Vyp. 8. Sotsiokul'turnye protsessy v perekhodnye i krizisnye epokhi. M.: Nauka, 2008. S. 218-242.
26.
Lamazhaa Ch.K. Problema arkhaizatsii obshchestva // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2009. 4. S. 44-48.
27.
Belyaev M.A. Pravovaya kommunikatsiya: sootnoshenie avtonomnogo i geteronomnogo nachal // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. 2018. 2. S. 3-12.
28.
Smirnov A.V. Vsechelovecheskoe vs. obshchechelovecheskoe. M.: OOO Sadra: Izdatel'skiĭ Dom YaSK, 2019. 216 s.