Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2065,   Articles in work: 293 Declined articles: 786 
Library

Back to contents

Law and Politics
Reference:

To the question of prosecutor’s involvement in examination of criminal cases by the judge and with participation of members of the jury
Cherepanov Maksim Mukhtarzhanovich

PhD in Law

Docent, the department of Prosecutorial Work, Ural State Law University

620137, Russia, Sverdlovskaya oblast', g. Ekaterinburg, ul. Komsomol'skaya, 21, of. 322

m.m.cherepanov@usla.ru
Bezrukov Yurii Ivanovich

Senior Educator, the department of Judicial Work, Ural State Law University

620019, Russia, Sverdlovskaya oblast', g. Ekaterinburg, ul. Moskovskaya, 120, of. 203, 204

m.m.cherepanov@usla.ru

Abstract.

The object of this research is some relevant problems of prosecutor’s involvements in examination of criminal cases by the courts. The subject of this research is the materials of prosecutorial and judicial practice, as well as the existing legislation of the Russian Federation. Currently, the participation of prosecutors in examination of criminal cases cannot be referred to as the absolute duty in the work of the National Prosecutor's Office. Therefore, the autho0r determines the problems of subjective and objective character. Human factor can be regarded as the first group: the inappropriate organization of work of the prosecutor’s office or its structural department on ensuring prosecutors’ participation in examination of criminal cases by the courts, as well as the insufficient experience of prosecutors and neglectful attitude to their duties. The second group implies the inadequacies of certain provisions of the existing Federal Law “On the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation”, including those contradicting the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation. The author underlines the urgent need for their solution, as well as proposes the original methods to overcome them. Special attention is given to education and self-education of the prosecutors, and bringing the provisions of the Articles 36 – 38 of the Federal Law On the Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation” in compliance with the norms of the Criminal Procedural Code of the Russian Federation.

Keywords: imperfections of legislation, criminal case, the jury, public prosecutor, prosecutor, prosecutor's office, judge, the court, problems, solutions

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0706.2019.6.29992

Article was received:

15-06-2019


Review date:

13-06-2019


Publish date:

19-06-2019


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Aleksandrov A., Belov S., Kukhta A. Reforma predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2007. № 5. S. 66.
2.
Andrianov M. S. Psikhologicheskie aspekty upravleniya v organakh prokuratury: posobie / M. S. Andrianov, M. V. Kroz, I. Yu. Mikhailova; Akad. Gen. Prokuratury Ros. Federatsii. – M., 2015. S. 41 – 43.
3.
Izgagina T. Yu. Aktual'nye voprosy otkaza transportnymi prokurorami ot gosudarstvennogo obvineniya v ugolovnom protsesse // Problemy povysheniya effektivnosti deyatel'nosti transportnykh prokuratur: sb. st. (Akad. Gen. prokuratury Ros. Federatsii / avt. kol. T. A. Dikanova i dr.: M., Akad. Gen. prokuratury Ros. Federatsii, 2010. S. 107 – 114.
4.
Isaenko V. N. Struktura chastnoi metodiki podderzhaniya gosudarstvennogo obvineniya // Zakonnost'. 2016. № 1. S. 27 – 30.
5.
Golovko I. I. Voprosy teorii i praktiki obucheniya prokurorskikh rabotnikov // Obrazovanie v sisteme prokuratury Rossii: sostoyanie i perspektivy. Vtorye Volzheninskie chteniya: materialy vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Sankt-Peterburgskii yuridicheskii in-t (filial) Akad. Gen. prokuratury Ros. Federatsii, 30 noyab. 2016 g.) / pod obshch. red. A. A. Sapozhkova.: SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskii yuridicheskii in-t (filial) Akad. Gen. prokuratury Ros. Federatsii, 2017. S. 138 – 146.
6.
Ergashev E. R. Prokurorskii nadzor v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Kurs lektsii/ E. R. Ergashev. – Ekaterinburg, 2016. S. 268.
7.
Kurchenko V. N. Deistviya gosudarstvennogo obvinitelya v sudebnom razbiratel'stve // Zakonnost'. 2019. № 1. S. 14 – 19.
8.
Rassmotrenie ugolovnogo dela sudom s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedatelei: uchebno-metodicheskie materialy po provedeniyu delovoi igry-treninga / avt.-sost. O. N. Korshunova, E. B. Serova, N. V. Kulik, G. G. Nepein; pod obshch. red. G. V. Shtadlera.: SPb: Sankt-Peterburgskii yuridicheskii in-t (filial) Akad. Gen. prokuratury Ros. Federatsii, 2017. S. 37.
9.
Teslov S. M. O praktike organizatsii raboty prokuratury raiona po obespecheniyu uchastiya v sudebnykh stadiyakh ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Materialy seminarov po obmenu opytom organizatsii raboty prokuratur gorodov, raionov 25 iyunya i 15 oktyabrya 2009 g. 2010. Vyp. 4. S. 43.
10.
Tushev A. A. Prokuror v ugolovnom protsesse Rossiiskoi Federatsii: sistema funktsii i polnomochii: diss. … d-ra yurid. nauk. Krasnodar, 2006 // URL: http://www.dissercat.com/content/prokuror-v-ugolovnom-protsesse-rossiiskoi-federatsii-sistema-funktsii-i-polnomochii (data obrashcheniya: 25.05.2019). S. 13.