Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2065,   Articles in work: 293 Declined articles: 786 
Library

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Liminal state of society during the globalization period and the ways of its overcoming
Fusu Larisa Ivanovna

PhD in Medicine


Educator, the department of Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Psychoanalysis at Chistye Prudy


105062, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Makarenko, 2/21

larisafusu@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The subject of this research is the liminality of society as a result of influence of globalizational transformations. The article analyzes the transformations of social consciousness in the era of universal building of information society and digital revolution. Such changes in the spiritual life are reduced to the concept of liminality, in other words, marginality between the entirely human and machine-like state. The study  demonstrates the possible ways of overcoming the liminal state, associated with weakening of the impact of mass culture through introduction to the traditional folk forms of spiritual life, as well as production of mid-culture. The philosophical-anthropological method along with the approaches of existentialism, Freud-Marxism, and cognitivism were used in the course of research. The author’s special contribution into the study of the topic of social liminality lies in the analysis of its correlation with globalization, as well as in the formulated conclusions that namely globalization and the related trends of informatization, digitalization, computerization, and automation lead to the liminal state of society. A thesis is proposed on the mass consciousness as the emanation of liminality.

Keywords: mass culture, informatization, world integration, cognitivism, computer metaphor of consciousness, affects, consciousness, limiting, western civilization, mid-culture

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0757.2019.5.29808

Article was received:

23-05-2019


Review date:

20-05-2019


Publish date:

30-05-2019


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Agafonov A.Yu. Kognitivnaya psikhomekhanika soznaniya, ili kak soznanie neosoznanno prinimaet reshenie ob osoznanii. Samara.: Izd-vo «Univers grupp», 2006.-348 s.
2.
Baryshnikov P.N. Mif i metafora: lingvofilosofskii podkhod. SPb: Aleteiya, 2010. – S. 154-170
3.
Bobkov A.I. Sotsial'naya liminal'nost' i skonstruirovannaya etnoarkhaika razlichie smyslov // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. № 394. S. 74-78.
4.
Veblen T. Teoriya prazdnogo klassa – M.: Librokom, 2011 g. – 374 s.
5.
Gennep A. van. Obryady perekhoda. Sistematicheskoe izuchenie obryadov. M: Izdatel'skaya firma «Vostochnaya litera-tura» RAN, 1999. 198 s.
6.
Il'in A. N. Ierarkhicheskii konstrukt massovoi kul'tury i kharakter ego vliyaniya na sub''ekt // Vestnik NGU. Seriya: Psikhologiya, 2009, Tom 3, vypusk. c. 116-122
7.
Kirillova, N.B. Mediakul'tura: ot moderna k postmodernu / N.B. Kirillova.-M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2005.-448 s.
8.
Smorgunov L. V. Politicheskoe «mezhdu»: fenomen liminal'nosti v sovremennoi politike . – Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2012. № 5. S. 159-169
9.
Terner V. Simvol i ritual-M.: Glavnaya redaktsiya vostochnoi literatury izdatel'stva «Nauka», 1983.-277 s.
10.
Freid Z. Po tu storonu printsipa udovol'stviya / Ya i Ono: Sochineniya. M.: Izd-vo EKSMO; Khar'kov: Izd-vo Folio 2005. 864 s.
11.
Fromm E. Imet' ili byt' M.: Progress, 1986 g. – 238 s.
12.
Fromm E. Chelovek dlya sebya – M.: AST: AST MOSKVA: KhRANITEL'', 2006. – 314 s.
13.
Fusu L.I. Fenomenologicheskoe osmyslenie liminal'nogo i psevdoliminal'nogo v kontekste formirovaniya poliidentichnogo prostranstva rossiiskogo obshchestva. Internet-resurs. URL: http://www.vipstd.com.postman.ru/index.php/en/series-cognition/series-cognition-2018/issues-cognition-2018-july/3326-pzn-2018-07-14
14.
Dennet D.C. Consciousness Explained. Symposium // Inquiry, Vol. 36, №1/2, 1993. R.143–147