Читать статью 'Цели создания процедур досудебного примирения в континентальном и англосаксонском праве' в журнале Право и политика на сайте nbpublish.com
Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1963,   Articles in work: 321 Declined articles: 630 

Back to contents

Law and Politics

Purpose of creating pretrial reconciliation procedure in the continental and Anglo-Saxon law

Makarenko Natal'ya Nikolaevna

Lawyer, GRAD Legal and Financial Advisory Services

140030, Russia, Moskovskaya Oblast' oblast', pgt. Malakhovka, ul. Sovetskaya, 20




Review date:


Publish date:



The subject of this research is the European, American and Russian legal experience in the area of pretrial reconciliation procedure (mediation). In particular, the author examines the historical path of the development of the institution of mediation on Europe, United States and Russia, as well as the modern European, American and Russian achievements in this regard. A detailed analysis is conducted on the causes and purpose of creating of such regulatory procedure; attention is turned to the various factors of their creation in the continental and Anglo-Saxon law. Methodological base is structure on the general scientific method of cognition, which reflects the correlation between the theory and law enforcement practice; a comparative legal method allows viewing the theoretical insights and pretrial proceedings, as well as the extensive practical application of mediation. The main conclusion lied in identification and analysis of the priority trends in development of the institution of mediation in Europe, United States and Russian Federation. The author reveals that the causes for creating such procedures in the continental and Anglo-Saxon law vary: if the United States attempts to broaden the access of citizens to justice, the European states pursued a different goal – to relieve the court system from the excessive amount of legal proceedings.

Keywords: conflicting parties, arbitrator, judicial reconciliation, regulatory framework, legal experience, mediator, mediation, pre-trial reconciliation, alternative dispute resolution, cross-border disputes
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

Abramson Garal'd I. Soprovozhdenie storon v protsesse mediatsii. M. : MTsUPK, 2013. 560 s.
Allakhverdova O.A., Ivanova E.N. Istoriya razvitiya mediatsii // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2007. Vyp. 2. Ch.II, S.73-78. Elektronnyi resurs: [https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/istoriya-razvitiya-mediatsii]
Arutyunyan A. Mediatsiya v ugolovnom protsesse. M.: Infotropik-Media, 2013. 292 s.
Besemer Kh. Mediatsiya: posrednichestvo v konfliktakh. Kaluga: Dukhovnoe poznanie, 2004. 176 s.
Davydenko D.L. Primiritel'nye protsedury v evropeiskoi pravovoi traditsii. M.: Infortropik-Media, 2013. 232 s.
Kalashnikova S.I. Mediatsiya v sfere grazhdanskoi yurisdiktsii. M.: Infotropik-Media, 2011. 304 s.
Kovach K. Mediatsiya: kratkii kurs. M.: Infotropik-Media, 2013-316 S.
Nosyreva S.I. Al'ternativnoe razreshenie sporov v SShA. OAO «Izdatel'skii Dom: Gorodets», 2005. 320 s.
Pel' M. Priglashenie k mediatsii M.: MTsUPK, 2009-400 S.
Rodzher Fisher, Uil'yam Uri. Peregovory bez porazheniya. Garvardskii metod. — Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2012. 347 s.
Endryus N. Sistema grazhdanskogo protsessa v Anglii. M.: Infotropik-media, 2012. 544 s.
A Dialogue between Professor Frank Sander and Mariana Hernandez Crespo: Exploring the Evolution of Multi-Door Courthouse. University of Saint Thomas Law Journal. Vol. 5. 2008. Nr. 3. P. 665 – 674.
Douglas Stone, Bruce Patton, Sheila Heen, Roger Fisher. Difficult conversations how to discuss what matters most. — 1 edition (April 2000). — Penguin Books, 2000. 250 P.
Roger Fisher, Alan Sharp, John Richardson. Getting It Done: How to Lead When You're Not in Charge. — HarperBusiness, 1999. 219 P.
Roger Fisher, Daniel Shapiro. Beyond Reason: Using Emotions as You Negotiate. — 1 edition (September 26, 2006). — Penguin Books, 2006. 246 P.
Serge Guinchard, Droit processuel, 9e ed. Dalloz, 2017, 1516 p.