Читать статью 'Невидимая реальность: Сознание в зеркале магического мышления' в журнале Психолог на сайте nbpublish.com
Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1868,   Articles in work: 383 Declined articles: 401 
Library

Back to contents

Psychologist
Reference:

The invisible reality: Consciousness in the mirror of magical thinking

Subbotsky Eugene

Doctor of Psychology

Professor, the department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Great Britain

CR0 2GG, Velikobritaniya, London oblast', g. Croydon, ul. Saffron Square, 11

subbotsky@me.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8701.2015.3.14198

Review date:

14-01-2015


Publish date:

02-06-2015


Abstract: The paper assesses the hypothesis according to which the human mind is the ability to simultaneously live in two types of reality: perceived everyday reality and invisible magical reality. At some point around 100 thousands years ago, humans develop the idea that there exist another world, in which spirits of dead ancestors dwell. They also discover that ancestors’ spirits have unusual properties: they can be invisible; they never die, can read people’s minds and feed on the vapours from burning sacrificed animals. Having made these discoveries, humans had a new look at their own everyday world and were surprised that this world is designed very differently from the world of ancestral spirits. That was the “moment” when human consciousness as we know it was born: the ability to view the everyday reality as if “from the outside.” This ability of “reflective thinking” gave rise to new forms of behaviour: voluntary behaviour and creative thinking. Creative thinking helps to produce new and more powerful tools for hunting, labour and communication. Sometime around 30 thousands years ago creative thinking helps to invent a new way of communicating with gods and spirits – communication, which was mediated by signs and symbols, such as cave paintings or bone sculptures. At the same time, or shortly afterwards, people started using symbolic means for purely utilitarian purposes, for example, for memorising the number of killed animals or manufactured clothes items. Subsequently, symbolic reality gives birth to written language and mathematics.But the emergence of consciousness, along with many achievements, brought about psychological problems. The main of these problems was to keep the everyday and the alternative magical realities apart. In order to make this possible, there appeared in humans a specific new psychological mechanism: the “realities distinguishing effort (RDE).” It took millennia for the RDE to achieve the level of perfection it has in modern humans. Like the work of the heart, the lungs and other organs, the RDE in modern humans is automatized and unconscious.Novelty: (1) For the first time the phenomenon of consciousness is interpreted as derivative from the belief in magical reality; (2) Distinguishing the RDE psychological mechanism is a new feature as well. Conclusions: (1) consciousness emerged as the human ability to simultaneously dwell in two distinct types of reality: the perceived everyday reality and the invisible magical reality; (2) consciousness gives rise to the new psychological abilities: voluntary behaviour and creative thinking; (3) creative thinking helps to invent new means of communicating with gods – symbols and signs, which subsequently turn into written language and mathematics; (4) the necessity to maintain the borderline between everyday and magical realities brings to life a new psychological mechanism: the “realities distinguishing effort” (RDE); (5) in the course of human history, the RDE becomes unconscious and automatized; (6) disturbance of the RDE in modern humans manifests itself in such forms as hallucinations (i.e., in schizophrenia patients) or religious radicalism; (7) recent psychological studies discovered that traces of the early humans’ belief in supernatural magical reality persist in the minds of modern rational individuals.


Keywords: malfunction of consciousness, distinction between realities, symbols and signs, voluntary behaviour, creative thinking, magical thinking, magical reality, consciousness, religious radicalism, hallucinations
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual'naya_real'nost'
2.
Rumbaugh, D.M., Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S., & Sevcik, R.A. (1994). Behavioral roots of language: A comparative perspective of chimpanzee, child, and culture. In R.W.Wrangham, W.C.McGrew, F.B.M. de Waal, & P.R. Heltne (Eds.), Chimpanzee cultures. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
3.
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kognitivnaya_etologiya
4.
Whiten, A., & Byrne, R. W. (1988). Tactical deception in primates. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 233-273.
5.
Hare, B., Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (2006). Chimpanzees deceive a human‬‬‬‬ competitor by hiding. Cognition, 101, 495-514.
6.
(http://scepsis.net/library/id_1278.html)
7.
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antropogenez
8.
Leakey R. (1994). The Origin of Humankind. New York, NY: Basic Books
9.
Morgan E (1982). The Aquatic Ape. New York: Stein & Day Pub.
10.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution
11.
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pozdnii_paleolit
12.
Dunbar, R. (2014). Human evolution. London: Pelican Books.
13.
Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1968). The art of prehistoric man in Western Europe. London: Thames & Hudson.
14.
Mithen, S. (2005). The prehistory of the mind. A search for the origins of art, religion and science. London: Thames & Hudson.
15.
N'yuberg E., D’Akvili, Rauz V. (2013). Taina boga i nauka o mozge. Neirobiologiya very i religioznogo opyta. Moskva: Eksmo.
16.
Subbotskii E. V. Magicheskii kristall Rene Magritta. Notabene, Chelovek i kul'tura, №3 za 2014 god, http://e-notabene.ru/ca/article_12113.html
17.
Trinkaus, E. (1993). Femoral neck-shaft angles of the Qafzeh-Skhul early modern humans, and activity levels among immature near eastern Middle Paleolithic hominids. Journal of Human Evolution , 25, 393–416.
18.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._neanderthalensis
19.
Eliade M. Svyashchennoe i mirskoe. M: Izdatel'stvo MGU.
20.
Harris, P. L., Brown, E., Marriot, C., Whittal, S., & Harmer, S. (1991). Monsters, ghosts and witches: Testing the limits of the fantasy–reality distinction in young children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 105–123.
21.
Subbotsky, E. (2005). The permanence of mental objects: Testing magical thinking on perceived and imaginary realities. Developmental Psychology, 41, 301–318.
22.
Jaynes, J. (1976).The origins of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
23.
Smith, D. (2007). Muses, Madmen, and Prophets: Rethinking the History, Science, and Meaning of Auditory Hallucination. New York: Penguin Press.
24.
Subbotsky, E. (2010a). Magic and the mind. Mechanisms, functions and development of magical thinking and behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Nemeroff C., Rozin P. (2000). The making of the magical mind: The nature and function of sympathetic magical thinking. In Rosengren K. S., Johnson C. N., Harris P. L. (Eds.), Imagining the impossible: Magical, scientific and religious thinking in children (pp. 1-34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Subbotsky, E. (2004) Magical thinking in judgments of causation: Can anomalous phenomena affect ontological causal beliefs in children and adults? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 123-152.
27.
Shafran, R., Thordarson, M.A., & Rachman, S. (1996). Thought-action fusion in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Jopurnal of Anxiety Disorders, 10, 379-391.
28.
Pronin, E., Wegner, D. M., McCarthy, K & Rodriguez, S. (2006). Everyday magical powers: The role of apparent mental causation in the overestimation of personal influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 218-231.
29.
Rozin, P. Millman, L., & Nemeroff, C. (1986). Operation of the laws of sympathetic magic in disgust and other domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 703-712.
30.
Subbotsky, E. (2007) Children’s and adults’ reactions to magical and ordinary suggestion: Are suggestibility and magical thinking psychologically close relatives? British Journal of Psychology, 98, 547–574.
31.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremism#cite_note-ab-1
32.
Atran, S. (2003). Genesis of suicidal terrorism. Science, 2999, 1534-1539.
33.
Thalbourne, M.A. (1994). Belief in the paranormal and its relationship to schizophrenia-relevant measures: A confirmatory study. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33, 78-80.
34.
Tissot, R., and Burnand, Y. (1980). Aspects of cognitive activity in schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine, 10, 657-63.
35.
Kandinskii, V. Kh. (2007) O psevdogallyutsinatsiyakh. M: Meditsinskaya Kniga. (Vpervye opublikovana v 1890 g.)
36.
Lauveng, A. (2012). Zavtra ya vsegda byvala l'vom. Samara: ID – «Bakhrakh-M».
37.
Garcia-Montes, J.M., Peres-Alvarez, M. Balbuena, C. S., Garcelan, S.P., & Cangas, A.J. (2006). Metacognitions in patients with hallucinations and obseccive-compulsive disorder: The superstition factor. Behavior Research and Therapy, 44, 1091-1104.
38.
Fuko M. (1998). Rozhdenie kliniki. Moskva: Smysl.
39.
Zilboorg, G. & Henry, G. W. (1941). A history of medical psychology. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
40.
Michelet, J. (1998). Satanism and Witchcraft: The classic study of medieval superstition. London: Kensington Publishing Corporation.
41.
Sas, T. (2008). Fabrika bezumiya. Ekaterinburg: Ul'tra. Kul'tura.
42.
Miller, D. (2011). Magiya – v pomoshch'. Kak zashchitit'sya ot magicheskikh i psikhicheskikh atak. Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatel'skaya gruppa «Ves'».
43.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_alphabet
44.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_mathematics
45.
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliktovoe_izluchenie