This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Back to contents

SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences

Reference:

Abgaryan D. // SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2014. № 4. P. 307-315. DOI: 10.7256/1339-3057.2014.4.11624 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=11624

The Place of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in progressive development of the law of the sea

Abgaryan Dzhetta

postgraduate student, Department of International Law, the Moscow State Institute for International Relations

125993, Moscow, Prospekt Vernadskogo, 76

jetta.ab@gmail.com

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "Law"

DOI:

10.7256/1339-3057.2014.4.11624

Received:

22-01-2015

Published:

05-02-2015

References

1. John Merrils, The Means of Dispute Settlement, in: Malcolm D.Evans, ed., International Law, second edition, 2006, p.546
2. Hudson M. O. International tribunals: past and future. N.Y., 1944.
3. Ginsburg T. Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking, in: Virginia Journal of International Law. Va. J. Int'l L. V.45, Spring, 2005.P.638.
4. Kamarowskii L.A. Le Tribunal International (Sergei Westman trans.), P., 1887, p.529.
5. Lauterpacht H. The development of international law by the International Court. L., 1958.
6. Sohn L. V.Problems of dispute settlement // Law of the sea: conference outcomes and problems of implementation. Proceedings of the law of the sea Institute tenth annual conference. Cambridge (Mass.), 1977. P. 223—232.
7. Saxena J. N. Limits of compulsory jurisdiction in respect of the law of the sea disputes // Law of the sea. Caracas and beyond / Ed. by R. P. Anand. The Hague; Boston; L., 1980.
8. Irwin P. C. Settlement of maritime boundary disputes. An analysis of the law of the sea negotiations // Ocean Dev. and internat. L. 1980. Vol. 8. P. 105—148.
9. Scott R., Stephan P.B. Self-Enforcing International Agreements and the Limits of Coercion// Wis. L. Rev. 551.V. 2004, 2004. P.580-8.
10. Safferling Ch. J. M. Towards an international criminal procedure. Oxford University Press, 2001.
11. Schabas W.A. Genocide Trials and Gacaca Courts. //Journal of International Criminal Justice. V.3, 2005.
12. A. A. Todorov. Territorial'nyi element sostava piratstva po ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 10. – S. 104-107.
13. M. R. Khubieva. Konkurentsiya yurisdiktsii v sluchae predpisaniya vremennykh mer pravovoi zashchity pri razreshenii mezhdunarodnykh morskikh sporov // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 104-107.
14. A. S. Kasatkina. Pravovye osnovy regulirovaniya mezhdunarodnykh passazhirskikh perevozok // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
15. G. Ts. Li. Morskaya politika Kitaya v regione ATR // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 104-107.
16. S. N. Ovchinnikov. Pogranichnyi kontrol' morskikh sudov v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: zakonodatel'stvo i praktika // Pravo i politika. – 2011. – № 12. – S. 104-107.
17. M. M. Kalenchenko. Territorial'naya okhrana morskoi sredy i svoboda sudokhodstva. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 2.
18. Li Guan' tsyun'. Kitaiskaya morskaya strategiya i politika na sovremennom etape // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2011. – № 6. – S. 104-107.
19. V. N. Konyshev, A. A. Sergunin. Remilitarizatsiya Arktiki i bezopasnost' Rossii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2011. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
20. E. B. Ganyushkina. Mezhdunarodnyi organ po morskomu dnu, Komissiya po granitsam kontinental'nogo shel'fa, Mezhdunarodnyi tribunal po morskomu pravu i nekotorye drugie mezhdunarodnye ob''edineniya,svyazannye s Konventsiei OON po morskomu pravu 1982 g. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 4.
21. A.M. Ibragimov. Spetsifika norm o garantiyakh v mezhdunarodnom morskom i rechnom prave // Pravo i politika. – 2009. – № 9.
22. Erpyleva N.Yu. Mezhdunarodnyi kommercheskii arbitrazh: pravovye osnovy funktsionirovaniya // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.1-74. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.545. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_545.html
23. Kalamkaryan R.A. Rol' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele podderzhaniya mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.184-214. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.690. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_690.html
24. Kalamkaryan R.A. Vklyuchennost' Rossiiskoi Federatsii v deyatel'nost' Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON v dele obespecheniya mezhdunarodnoi zakonnosti i pravoporyadka // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 2.-S.85-118. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.2.691. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_691.html
25. Kuz'mina Yu.A. Nekotorye osobennosti praktiki Evropeiskogo Suda v otnoshenii Rossiiskoi Federatsii // NB: Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. — 2013.-№ 3.-S.68-87. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.3.2424. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/wl/article_2424.htm

Journals

Books

The Place of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in progressive development of the law of the sea