Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Taxes and Taxation
Reference:

Balakina Z.V. International Tax Concept of the Beneficial Owner of Income and the Right to Use and Dispose Income

Abstract: The present article is devoted to the problems of interpreting the international 'against-tax-avoidance' concept of the beneficial owner of income aimed at counteracting illegal implementation of double taxation treaties. In her research Balakina analyzes the definition of the beneficial owner of income fixed in Clause 2 of Article 7 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation through such definition criterion as a personal right to use and dispose income. Having analyzed approaches described in OECD Commentaries, foreign legal precedents, points of view of foreign and Russian scientists on internatioinal taxation, and written explanations of the Ministry of Finance of Russia, the author comes to the conclusion that the definition criterion of the beneficial owner iof income fixed in Article 7 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation does not bear any significant meaning and does not clarify the aforesaid concept. On the contrary, it creates pluralism of opinions regarding what the right to use and dispoise income actually means. The methodological basis of the research consists of general and specific scientific methods and techniques such as dialectical, formal logical, comparative, stryctured system approaches, methods of analysis, synthesis and others. Application of the aforesaid methods allows to combine theoretical analysis with solution of practical tasks that are significant for interpreting and implementing the concept of the beneficial owner of income. The main contribution of the author is that she offers her own definition of the beneficial owner of income instead of the definition fixed in Clause 2 of Article 7 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation and suggests to inclue this definition in Article 3 of the Typical OECD Treaty No. 84 'On Concluding International Treaties on Avoiding Double Taxation and Prevention of Fiscal Evasion' approved by the decree of the Government of the Russian Federation on February 24, 2010.


Keywords:

concept definition criterion, obligation to pass income, treaty shopping, economic approach, technical legal approach, right to dispose income, right to use income, Update OECD Commentaries, International Tax treaties, beneficial owner of income


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Weeghel van S. The Improper Use of Tax Treaties: with Particular Referance to the Netherlands and the United States, Series on International Taxation, Kluwer Law International, 1998,-[Elektronnyy resurs]. – 1998 g. – Rezhim dostupa: http://books.google.ru/books?id=2BTfZURbHLkC&pg=PA3&hl=ru& source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q&f=false.
2. Verdoner Louan, Offermanns René, Huibregtse Steef, A Cross-Country Perspective on Beneficial Ownership – Part 1, European Taxation, september 2010, pp. 419-429, [Elektronnyy resurs]. – 2010 g. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.tpa-global.com/files/StreamFile33251/2010_x-country_ perspective_bo.pdf.
3. Lang Michael, Pistone Pasquale, Alexander Rust, Josef Schuch, Claus Staringer, Alfred Storck, The OECD-Model-Convention and its Update 2014, Linde, IBFD, 2015, p. 46-47; 27.
4. Danon R. Clarification of the Meaning of ”Beneficial Owner” in the OECD Model Tax Convention – Comment on the April 2011 Discussion Draft, 2011 [Elektronnyy resurs]. 2011 g. - Rezhim dostupa: http://www.oecd.org/ ctp/treaties/48415237.pdf;
5. Khavanova I. Protsenty i dividendy: konflikt kvalifikatsiy pri nalogooblozhenii // Nalogovyy vestnik. 2013. ¹ 6. S. 45-51; ¹ 7. S. 39-46; ¹ 8. S. 53-61.
6. Machekhin V.A. Problemy primeneniya i tolkovaniya nalogovykh dogovorov RF v tselyakh nalogovogo planirovaniya // Yurist. 2011. ¹ 7. S. 17-25.
7. Machekhin V.A. Fakticheskoe pravo na dokhod: rossiyskie fiskal'nye organy razvivayut kontseptsiyu, 15.07.2016, http://otrasli-prava.rf/article/19317;
8. Demin A.V. Otnositel'no-opredelennye sredstva v sisteme nalogovo-pravovogo regulirovaniya: tendentsii i perspektivy // Finansovoe pravo. 2012. ¹ 1. S. 6-9.
9. Bruk B.Ya. Kodifikatsiya kontseptsii benefitsiarnogo sobstvennika v rossiyskom nalogovom zakonodatel'stve: postanovka problemy // Zakon. 2013. ¹ 4. S. 54-62.
10. Bruk B.Ya. Perspektivy kodifikatsii kontseptsii benefitsiarnogo sobstvennika v rossiyskom nalogovom zakonodatel'stve, 08.01.2015 g.
11. Pis'mo Ministerstva Finansov Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 21.04.2006 g. ¹ 03-08-02.
12. Balakina Z.V. Pravovye problemy interpretatsii kontseptsii benefitsiarnogo sobstvennika dokhoda v rossiyskom nalogovom zakonodatel'stve // Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2015. ¹ 6 (105). S. 87.
13. Pis'mo Ministerstva Finansov Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 30.12.2011 g. ¹ 03-08-13/1.
14. Pis'mo Ministerstva Finansov Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 15.10.2007 g. ¹ 03-08-05.
15. Swiss Federal Supreme Court, Judgment of 05.05.2015, 2nd Administrative Law Division, Case 2c_263/2012, Inofficial translation, Walter Wyss Ltd.
16. Pis'mo Ministerstva Finansov Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 27.03.2015 g. ¹ 03-08-05/16994.
17. Pis'mo Ministerstva Finansov Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 19.05.2014 g. ¹ 03-08-13/23614.
18. Pis'mo Ministerstva Finansov Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 09.04.2014 g. ¹ 03-00-R3/16236.
19. Pis'mo Ministerstva Finansov Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 26.09.2012 g. ¹ 03-08-05.
20. Swiss Federal Administrative Tribunal decision of July 23, 2012, case ¹ A-1246/2011,-[Elektronnyy resurs],-Rezhim dostupa: http://www.bvger.ch/publiws/pub/cache.jsf.
21. England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division)’s Decision of March 2, 2006, Indofood International Finance Ltd v JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. London Branch [2006] EWCA Civ 158, ¹ A3/2005/2497, //-[Elektronnyy resurs],-Rezhim dostupa: http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc =/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/158.html&query=indofood&method=boolean.
22. Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad)'s decision of April 6, 1994, ¹. 28.638/BNB 1994/217.
23. OECD Model Tax Convention: Revised Proposals Concerning the meaning of “Beneficial Owner” in articles 10, 11 and 12, 19 October 2012 to 15 December 2012 [Elektronnyy resurs],-2012 g.,-Rezhim dostupa: http://www.oecd.org/ctp/treaties/Beneficialownership.pdf.
24. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma VAS RF ¹ 8654/11 ot 15.11.2011 (A27-7455/2010; 07AP-8831/10; A27-7455/2010).
25. Postanovlenie Devyatogo Arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 26.01.2015 g. po delu ¹ A40-100177/13.
26. Postanovlenie Devyatogo Arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 05.06.2015 g. po delu ¹ A14-13723/2013.
27. Canada's Tax court's decision of April 22, 2008, Prévost Car Inc. v., The Queen, case ¹ 2008 T.C.C. 231 (CanLII),-[Elektronnyy resurs],-2008,-Rezhim dostupa: //http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/tcc/doc/2008/2008tcc231/2008tcc 231.html.
28. Update to the OECD Model Tax Convention, [Elektronnyy resurs], - 2014 g. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.oecd.org/tax/treaties/2014-update-model-tax-concention.pdf.
29. Clarification of the meaning of «Beneficial owner» in the OECD Model Tax Conventionl: Discussion Draft, 29 April 2011 to 15 July 2011 [Elektronnyy resurs],-2011 g. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.oecd.org/tax/treaties/47643872.pdf.