Рус Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2071,   Articles in work: 296 Declined articles: 784 

Maksimov L.V. Knowledge and values in the structure of humanitarian disciplines

Published in journal "Philosophy and Culture", 2016-11 , pages 1498-1505.

Resume: The subject of this research is the equivocal – simultaneously value and cognitive – status of humanitarian disciplines. Despite the obvious presence of the value component in composition of these disciplines (notably, presence not only as the object of cognition, but also as the scholar’s own value position), the are usually qualified in the philosophical-methodological literature as the branches of knowledge, specific sciences (compared with other sciences). The article gives a different interpretation of the structure and functions of humanitarian disciplines. It is demonstrated that in this field have practically established the two interrelated and formally inseparable, but in essence, discordant types of intellectual activity: alongside the humanitarian sciences, which describe and explain the realities of human existence, it is also the value-normative doctrines, which suggest and rationally substantiate certain life orientations of the people. The methodological foundation lies in the non-cognitivist approach that stands for the beyond cognition specificity of the value-normative phenomena of consciousness, as well as their profound irreducibility to knowledge. This approach formed in the last several decades as the alternative to the traditional cognitivist paradigm that interprets human mentality in general as the area exclusively of the knowledge and cognition. The important practical result of discrediting of the cognitivist paradigm consists in the radical retargeting of the methodology of ethical upbringing: rejection of the traditional “educational” orientation (according to which, the values are retransmitting through the transfer of “knowledge” of good, duty, etc.; in other words, by means of moral edifications) in favor of the more efficient methods of psychological and socio-deterministic impact upon the souls of the educates.

Keywords: Metaethics, Reductionism, Non-cognitivism , Cognitivism , Values, Knowledge, humaniora, humanities, Humanitarian sciences, Humanitarian disciplines

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2016.11.21062

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Агацци Э. Моральное измерение науки и техники. М.: Московский философский фонд, 1998. 344 с.
Калиниченко В.В. Науки о духе // Современная западная философия. Словарь. М.: ТОН – Остожье, 1998. 544 с.
Касавин И.Т. Знание // Новая философская энциклопедия: в 4 т. Т. 2. М.: Мысль, 2001. 692 с.
Максимов Л.В. Когнитивизм как парадигма гуманитарно-философской мысли. М.: Российская политическая энциклопедия (РОССПЭН), 2003. 160 с.
Микешина JI.A. Философия познания: Полемические главы. М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2002. 622 с.
Микешина Л.А. Эпистемология ценностей. М.: Российская политическая энциклопедия (РОССПЭН), 2007. 439 с.
Михайлов И.А. Риккерт // Новая философская энциклопедия: в 4 т. Т. 3. М.: Мысль, 2001. 634 с.
Патнэм Х. Разум, истина и история / Пер. с англ. М.: Праксис, 2002. 296 с.
Степин В.С. Наука // Новая философская энциклопедия: в 4 т. Т. 3. М.: Мысль, 2001. 634 с.
Филатов В.П. Обсуждаем статью «Знание» // Эпистемология и философия науки. Научно-теоретический журнал по общей методологии науки, теории познания и когнитивным наукам. 2004. Т. 1. № 1. 256 с.
Хабермас Ю. Моральное сознание и коммуникативное действие / Пер. с нем. СПб.: Наука, 2001. 380 с.
Хэар Р. Как же решать моральные вопросы рационально? // Мораль и рациональность. М.: ИФРАН, 1995. 197 с.
Coulter J. Twenty-Five Theses against Cognitivism // Theory, Culture and Society. 2008. Vol. 25(2). P. 19-32.
Humanities // Wikipedia. (Autumn 2016 Edition). URL:
Svensson F. Does Non-Cognitivism Rest on a Mistake? // Utilitas. 2007. Vol. 19 (2). P. 184-200.
van Roojen M. Moral Cognitivism vs. Non-Cognitivism // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Winter 2012 Edition). URL:
Watson R., Coulter J. The Debate over Cognitivism // Theory, Culture and Society. 2008. Vol. 25 (2). P. 1-17

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard