Ðóñ Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 2077,   Articles in work: 308 Declined articles: 871 
Library
Articles and journals | Tariffs | Payments | Your profile

Korotkikh V.I. “Haecceity” as the subject of default: to the question of the relation of A. F. Losev to the transcendental-speculative philosophy of Hegel

Published in journal "Philosophy and Culture", 2016-10 in rubric "History of ideas and teachings", pages 1395-1402.

Resume: This article explores the relation of A. F. Losev to the transcendental understanding of being in the philosophy of Hegel. Basing on the observation of V. O. Troitsky, according to which the Russian philosopher avoids using the notion of “haecceity”, the author reveals the position of A. F. Loves regarding Hegel’s philosophy, as well as underlines the specificities of Russian philosophy in the global historical-philosophical process. Special attention is given to the analysis of Hegel’s concept of the structure of reasoning, as well as Losev’s doctrine on correlation of the symbol and artistic image. The author proves that the noted by the Russian researcher peculiarity of Losev’s use of the philosophical terminology is caused by the nonrandom factors, but rather its fundamental position on the key issue of ontology. For the first time in scientific literature, the author reveals the peculiarities of the aesthetical doctrines of the German and Russian philosophers that are substantiated by their ontological preferences. This work also reconstructs the historical-cultural context of the differences, detected between the philosophers, in the assessments of opportunity regarding the philosophical cognition of the Absolute.

Keywords: symbolism, certainty, structure of reasoning, transcendentalism, Hegel, A. F. Losev, Haecceity, symbol, artistic image, specificities of the Russian philosophy

DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2016.10.19977

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
Losev A. F. Nekotorye voprosy iz istorii ucheniy o stile // Losev A. F. Problema khudozhestvennogo stilya. – Kiev: «Collegium», «Kievskaya Akademiya Evrobiznesa», 1994. S. 2-168.
Gegel' G. V. F. Sochineniya. T. XII. Lektsii po estetike. Kn. 1. M.: Gosudarstvennoe sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe izdatel'stvo, 1938. 471 s.
Losev A. F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo. M.: Iskusstvo, 1995. 320 s.
Hegel G. W. F. Phänomenologie des Geistes. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun, 1987. 596 S.
R.K. Omel'chuk Aleksey Fedorovich Losev:zhizn' v mife // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2013. - 5. - C. 424 - 432. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.5.8302.
E.M. Spirova Mif i simvol v protsesse postizheniya cheloveka // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2011. - 10. - C. 34 - 41.
R.K. Omel'chuk Ontologiya very v svete filosofskogo naslediya A.F. Loseva // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. - 2011. - 11. - C. 15 - 25.
Gogotishvili L.A. Vklad postsimvolistov Loseva i Bakhtina v teoriyu postroeniya diskursa (printsipial'nye razlichiya na fone fundamental'nogo skhodstva) // Filologiya: nauchnye issledovaniya. - 2014. - 4. - C. 354 - 368. DOI: 10.7256/2305-6177.2014.4.13430.
Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. SPb.: A-cad, 1994. 404 s.
Troitskiy V. P. Razyskaniya o zhizni i tvorchestve A. F. Loseva. M.: Agraf, 2007. 448 s.
Losev A. F. Vladimir Solov'ev i ego vremya. M.: Progress, 1990. 720 s.
Gegel' G. V. F. Entsiklopediya filosofskikh nauk. T. 3. Filosofiya dukha. M.: Mysl', 1977. 471 s.
Losev A. F. Filosofiya imeni. M.: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1990. 269 s.
Gogotishvili L. A. Losevskaya kontseptsiya predikativnosti // Losev A. F. Lichnost' i absolyut. M.: Mysl', 1999. S. 770-795.
Gegel' G. V. F. Sistema nauki. Ch. 1. Fenomenologiya dukha // Sochineniya. T. IV. M.: Izd-vo sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoy literatury, 1959. 440 s.

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard