Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Taxes and Taxation
Reference:

Chesnokova L.A., Malyshev S.A., Yashina N.I. Factor Modeling of Receipts of Income tax in the Regional Budget

Abstract: The subject of the research is income tax revenues in the regional budget of the Russian Federation. The authors of the article analyze the possibility of using factor models for predicting tax revenues. The purpose of the research is to connect socio-economic indicators of regions with the volume of receipts of the income tax. To achieve the aforesaid target, it is necessary to allocate the factors defining receipts of income tax in the regional budget and to establish their mathematical dependence with the income tax. In order to achieve the reserach goals, the authors have chosen significant factors, and have constructed one-factor and two-factor mathematical models of receipt of income tax depending on qualititaive elements of the tax. The Nizhny Novgorod Region is chosen as the case study. Based on the analysis of data from the Federal Tax Service of the Russian Federation and Federal State Statistics Service of the Russian Federation the authors have created regression models. As a result of the research the authors have developed one-factor models to demonstrate the relation between the target indicator (the amount of the income tax received by the regional budget) and sign factors. They have also outlined two significant sign factors to be used in the two-factor model that would reflect the influence of indicators of the amount of tax payments on regional tax revenues (in the Nizhny Novgorod Region). To prove the significance and validity of the models the authors have used mathematical and statistical methods. All the models have been recognized as significant based on the research results. The authors of the present research have established the mathematical relationship (in the form of regression models) between income tax revenues and their determinant factors.   


Keywords:

number of taxpayers, accounts receivable, correlation, tax income, regional budget, sign factor, regression model, income tax, tax revenue, modeling of the income


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Abazova F.M., Abregova M.K., Tatueva F.B., Kochesokova I.Kh. [Nalogovoe prognozirovanie i otsenka nalogovogo potentsiala v spektre uluchsheniy postupleniy nalogov i sborov v byudzhetnuyu sistemu]. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo, 2014, ¹ 5-2 (46-2), c. 59-63.
2. Gamukin V.V. Byudzhetnye riski: gruppy, vidy, primery: monografiya, Tyumen': Izdatel'stvo Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2015, 340s.
3. Lapushinskaya G.K., Lebedeva V.I. [Vozmozhnost' otsenki nalogovogo potentsiala territoriy s pomoshch'yu kontseptsii elastichnosti]. Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie, 2014, ¹4, s.107-114.
4. Chesnokova L.A., Yashina N.I. [Sozdanie algoritma raspredeleniya nalogov po urovnyam byudzhetnoy sistemy]. Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie, 2016, ¹ 4, c.300-316.
5. Boren C. Equitable apportionment – administrative discretion and uniformity in division of corporate income for state-tax purposes. Southern California Law Rewiew, 1976, no 5, pp.991-1078
6. Dexter W.D. Business versus non business distinction under uniform division of income for tax purpose act. Urban lawyer, 1978, no 10, pp.243-265
7. Dixit A., Londregan J. Fiscal federalism and redistributive politics. Journal of Public Economics, 1998, no 2, pp. 153-180
8. Brager D.K., Bogomolova O.Yu., Brizitskaya A.V., Davidchuk N.N., Sokolova A.S., Popova I.V., Smirnova M.A., Sovetova N.P., Shabel'nik T.V. Monografiya / Pod redaktsiey M.M. Skoreva. Sovremennaya ekonomika: analiz sostoyaniya i perspektivy razvitiya. Stavropol', 2015.
9. Makarov A.P. [Postuplenie nalogov v konsolidirovannyy byudzhet i osnovnye napravleniya nalogovoy politiki]. Metallurg, 2007, ¹ 3, c. 16-18.
10. Zaykov V.P., Kozhevnikov M.S. [Faktornoe modelirovanie byudzhetnykh postupleniy kosvennykh nalogov]. Trudy Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2015, ¹ 56, c. 42-48.
11. Sirgazhina D.I. [Analiz dinamiki postupleniya nalogov v byudzhet Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii shkol'nikov, studentov, magistrantov i aspirantov], 2014, s. 124-126.
12. Dadasheva Yu.A. [Prognozirovanie postupleniy po imushchestvennym nalogam: metod strukturnogo modelirovaniya]. Nalogovaya politika i praktika, 2009, ¹ 11, s. 66-70.
13. Sklyar A.V., Tsatsulin A.N. [Modelirovanie regional'nykh byudzhetnykh dokhodov regiona ot naloga na pribyl' organizatsiy i NDFL]. Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie, 2011, s.4-10
14. Aliev B.Kh. [O nalogovom regulirovanii dokhodov sub'ektov Federatsii], Finansy, 2010, ¹11, s.32-38.
15. Smirnov V.P., Erokhina L.D., Pindyurina S.V. [Ispolnenie regional'nogo byudzheta po raskhodam v postkrizisnom periode]. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i innovatsii, 2014, ¹6-2(38), s.42
16. Musaev A.F.O., Gasanly Ya.G., Shykhaliev V.R. [Otsenka zavisimosti postupleniy po nalogu na pribyl' ot ob'ema VVP]. Mezhdunarodnyy nauchnyy zhurnal, 2009, ¹ 2, s. 19-22.
17. Orobinskaya I.V., Orobinskiy A.S., Osipenko I.V. Znachenie naloga na pribyl' organizatsiy v dokhodnoy chasti konsolidirovannogo byudzheta Rossii // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2016. - 2. - C. 147 - 153. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2016.2.17693.
18. Shemyakina M.S. Modelirovanie nalogovogo potentsiala regiona // Finansy i upravlenie. - 2015. - 2. - C. 1 - 43. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7802.2015.2.14544. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/flc/article_14544.html
19. Tsokova V.A. Vzaimodeystvie nalogovoy bazy i nalogovoy stavki NDS i naloga na pribyl' pri opredelenii real'noy nalogovoy nagruzki // Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekonomika. - 2014. - 4. - C. 39 - 57. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8647.2014.4.12601. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/etc/article_12601.html
20. Kucheryavenko N.P. Soglasovanie rodovykh i vidovykh konstruktsiy pri regulirovanii byudzhetnykh dokhodov // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2014. - 1. - C. 120 - 140. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2014.1.9886.
21. Shemyakina M.S. Nalogovye dokhody kak element arkhitektoniki nalogovogo potentsiala // Finansy i upravlenie. - 2015. - 1. - C. 11 - 19. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7802.2015.1.14531. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/flc/article_14531.html
22. E. Yu. Gracheva Osnovnye tendentsii razvitiya byudzhetnogo kontrolya v RF // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2013. - 2. - C. 4 - 38. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2013.2.9880.
23. Knyazheva O.V. Sovremennaya nalogovaya politika Rossii i tendentsii ee razvitiya v 2015-2016 gg. // Finansy i upravlenie. - 2015. - 3. - C. 25 - 40. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7802.2015.3.15238. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/flc/article_15238.html
24. Tsokova V.A. Sravnitel'nyy analiz nalogovykh sistem Rossii, Frantsii, Velikobritanii i Yaponii // Teoreticheskaya i prikladnaya ekonomika. - 2015. - 2. - C. 1 - 12. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8647.2015.2.13457. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/etc/article_13457.html