Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Pedagogy and education
Reference:

Baksanskiy O.E., Emelin I.A. Evolutionary Theory of Knowledge Within the Interdisciplinary Framework

Abstract: In this article the review of modern researches on the theory of knowledge is given, the new interdisciplinary endeavour which purpose is to research biological prerequisites of human knowledge and to explain features of knowledge on the basis of the modern evolutionary synthesis and Michael Polanyi's philosophy of science is considered. Application of the evolutionary approach allows to allocate a new foreshortening in the theory of knowledge. This approach is based on rationalistic attitudes and is focused on consideration of real cognitive processes, on research of real informative process by the means of modern science. Analysis of modern researches on the theory of knowledge allows to pay attention to the new methodology which can be described as the 'naturalistic' approach. This approach tries to analyze all kinds of philosophical problems from the scientific standpoint using specific scientific knowledge. For the purposes of the present research the authors believe it is necessary to analyze the new interdisciplinary endeavour aimed at studying biological prerequisites of human knowledge and to explain features of knowledge based on the modern evolutionary synthesis. As a conclusion, the authors state that the analysis of knowledge from the biological point of view shows that there is an opportunity to broaden our cognitive area. The consecutive understanding of biology as a science about interaction of living systems with environment and among themselves defines a methodological position of Lorentz which he called a hypothetical realism after Campbell. 


Keywords:

evolutionary approach, cognitive map, tacit knowledge, world picture, interdisciplinary approach, methodology of science, theory of knowledge, autophoesis, philosophy of science, rationality


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. A.A. Voronin Usloviya vybora i vybor usloviy // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. ¹ 7. C. 932 - 941. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.7.6449.
2. Baksanskiy O.E. Konvergentsiya: metodologiya meganauki // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2014. ¹ 4. C. 505-518. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.4.10390.
3. Korzhuev A.V., Baksanskiy O.E. Pedagogicheskoe issledovanie v sovremennom nauchnom diskurse // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. 2014. ¹ 4. C. 51-65. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2014.4.13926.
4. Gurevich P.S. Filosofskoe bratstvo // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2015. ¹ 11. C. 1593-1596. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2015.11.17113.
5. Follmer G. Evolyutsionnaya teoriya poznaniya. Vrozhdennye struktury poznaniya v kontekste biologii, psikhologii, lingvistiki, filosofii i teorii nauki. M., 1998. 226 c.
6. Polani M. Lichnostnoe znanie. M.: «Progress», 1985. 344 s.
7. Smirnova N.M. Kontseptsiya neyavnogo znaniya M. Polani i problema nauchnoy istiny // Priroda istiny v sotsial'nom poznanii. Kalinin, 1985. S. 101-109.
8. Maturana U.R., Varela F.Kh. Drevo poznaniya. Biologicheskie korni chelovecheskogo poznaniya. M., 1999. 186 c.
9. Motorina L.E. Vzaimosvyaz' lichnostnogo i nadlichnostnogo znaniya // Filosofskie nauki. 1982. S. 52-58.
10. Lorents K. Oborotnaya storona zerkala. M., 1998. 216 c.
11. Kuznetsov A.S. Lichnost' i poznavatel'nye vozmozhnosti sub'ekta // Izv. Saratovskogo un-ta. Ser. Akmeologiya obrazovaniya. Psikhologiya razvitiya. 2013. T. 2. Vyp. 1(5). 116 c.
12. Baksanskiy O.E., Kucher E.N. Kognitivnyy obraz mira: Prolegomeny k filosofii obrazovaniya. M., 2010. 204 c.
13. Berger P., Lukman T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya. M.: Medium, 1995. 166 c.
14. Glinskiy B.A., Baksanskiy O.E. Modelirovanie i kognitivnye reprezentatsii. M.: Al'teks, 2000. 188 c.
15. Baksanskiy O.E., Gnatik E.N., Kucher E.N. Estestvoznanie: Sovremennye kognitivnye kontseptsii. M., 2008. 212 c.
16. Baksanskiy O.E., Gnatik E.N., Kucher E.N. Nanotekhnologii. Biomeditsina. Filosofiya obrazovaniya. V zerkale mezhdistsiplinarnogo konteksta. M., 2010. 196 c.
17. Maturana H.R., Varela F.J. The Tree of Knowledge. The Biological of Roots of Human Understanding, Boston & London, 1988. 186 p.
18. Arshavskiy I.A. Biologicheskie korni poznavatel'noy deyatel'nosti zhivykh sistem v svete dannykh negentropiynoy teorii ontogeneza // V kn.: Kul'tura i razvitie nauchnogo znaniya. M.: IFRAN, 1991. S. 46-78.
19. Baksanskiy O.E. Kognitivnye reprezentatsii: Obydennye, sotsial'nye, nauchnye. M., 2009. 186 c.
20. Lorenz K. Kants Lehre vom Apriorischen im Lichte Gegenwartigen Biologic, Blatter fur deutsche Philosophie, 1941 (mehrfach nachgedruckt). 214 p.
21. Campbell D.T. Evolutionary epistemology// In Schilpp, P.A. (Hrsg.): The philosophy of K.R. Popper, Open Court, La Salle, 1974. 12-23 p.