Ðóñ Eng During last 365 days Approved articles: 1919,   Articles in work: 328 Declined articles: 648 
Library

Trufanov M.E., Anokhina N.V. Legal and regulatory justification of the involvement of a specialist into administrative proceedings

Published in journal "Police activity", 2016-4 in rubric "Administrative activity of the police", pages 385-392.

Resume: The research subject is the range of issues of the procedural involvement of a specialist into administrative proceedings. The authors analyze the legal framework of a specialist involvement. The paper demonstrates the authors’ opinions on the competent persons, responsible for involving a specialist in the stages of administrative proceedings. The authors point out two types of specialists – included and invited – and the possibilities of their involvement. The study substantiates the responsibility of a specialist for absence and considers the way of inviting a specialist to administrative proceedings. The research methodology is based on the practical achievements of epistemology. The methodology includes general philosophical and theoretical methods (dialectics, the system method, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction and observation) and traditional methods of jurisprudence (formal logical). The results of the study are reflected in the conclusions about a comprehensive list of competent persons responsible for inviting a specialist in the stages of administrative proceedings; about amending the Administrative Procedure Code with the provisions about the responsibility of a specialist for absence without valid excuse upon the invitation of the court, the organization or the official; about the ways of a specialist involvement. The results of the research can be used by police officers of the Russian Federation. The scientific novelty of the study consists in the substantiation of a possibility to involve a specialist, in the proposals for amending the Administrative Procedure code with the provisions about the responsibility of an involved specialist for absence without a valid excuse and about the ways to invite a specialist. 

Keywords: officials, specialist involvement, right to invite a specialist, involvement of a specialist, specialist, parties of the proceedings , stages of the proceedings, proceedings, administrative jurisdiction, administrative offences

DOI: 10.7256/2222-1964.2016.4.16831

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

Bibliography:
Bakhrakh D.N. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii. M., 2012.
Vinokurov A.Yu. Prokuror kak uchastnik proizvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Prokurorskaya deyatel'nost': voprosy teorii i praktiki: sbornik materialov nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, provedennoy na yuridicheskom fakul'tete MosGU 21 noyabrya 2013 g.-M., 2014.
Grechkina O. V. K voprosu o ponyatii administrativnoy yurisdiktsii / O. V. Grechkina // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.-2010.-¹ 3.
Dugenets A.S. Kopiya postanovleniya po delu ob administrativnom pravonarushenii kak sredstvo zashchity konstitutsionnykh prav grazhdan // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2002. ¹ 1.
Zubach A.V., Safonenkov P.N. Obespechenie prav uchastnikov pro-izvodstva po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti tamozhennogo dela. – M., 2013.
Kaplunov A.I., Drozd A.O. O predmete administrativnoy yurisdiktsii i ponyatii administrativno-yurisdiktsionnoy deyatel'nosti // Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. Vypusk ¹4 / 2012.
Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh ot 30.12.2001 ¹ 195-FZ (red. ot 13.07.2015, s izm. ot 14.07.2015) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 25.07.2015) // http://www.consultant.ru/online/ (obrashchenie 31.07.2015 g.).
Lapina M.A. Administrativnaya yurisdiktsiya v sisteme admini-strativnogo protsessa. – M., 2013.
Obshchiy tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka. Slovar' Dalya. // http:// tolkslovar.ru/p18624.html. (obrashchenie 31.07.2015 g.).
Salishcheva N.G. Problemnye voprosy instituta administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // Administrativnaya otvetstvennost': voprosy teorii i praktiki. – M., 2005.
Sementsov V.A., Skrebets G.G. Uchastie advokata – zashchitnika v formirovanii dokazatel'stv na stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya. – M.: Izdatel'stvo «Yurlitinform», 2009.
Solntsev K.N. Ispol'zovanie spetsial'nykh poznaniy i tekhnicheskikh sredstv pri rassmotrenii del ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh kak element realizatsii institutov obshchey chasti KoAP RSFSR // Sb. nauch. tr. VNII MVD RF.-M., 1998.-S. 186.
Tolkovyy slovar' russkogo yazyka. Slovar' Ozhegova. // http://tolkru.com/page/vqizqivaty.php. (obrashchenie 31.07.2015 g.).
Trufanov M.E. Problemy kategorizatsii sub'ektov i aktov primeneniya norm administrativnogo prava: Monografiya. – VNII MVD Rossii, 2006.
Federal'nyy zakon ot 31.05.2002 ¹ 63-FZ (red. ot 13.07.2015) «Ob advokatskoy deyatel'nosti i advokature v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons (obrashchenie 03.08.2015 g.).
Federal'nyy zakon ot 17.12.1998 ¹188-FZ «O mirovykh sud'yakh v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» // http://ivo.garant.ru/#/document/12113961/paragraph/17598:1 (obrashchenie 31.07.2015).
V.D. Plesovskikh Tendentsii razvitiya federal'nogo administrativno-deliktnogo prava i zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika. - 2012. - 12. - C. 1990 - 1994.
Nobel' A.R. Material'no-pravovoe i protsessual'noe znachenie kharakteristik sobytiya administrativnogo pravonarusheniya kak odnogo iz obstoyatel'stv, vkhodyashchikh v predmet dokazyvaniya po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh (na primere del v oblasti okhrany okruzhayushchey sredy). // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2014. - 1. - C. 25 - 29. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.1.9884.
Lipinskiy D.A. Funktsii administrativnoy otvetstvennosti // NB: Administrativnoe pravo i praktika administrirovaniya. - 2015. - 3. - C. 63 - 93. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9945.2015.3.15975. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/al/article_15975.html
Vasil'eva E.S., Nekhaychik V.K. Kontseptsiya administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v mekhanizme administrativno-pravovogo vozdeystviya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2011. - 10. - C. 38 - 43.
Nobel' A.R. Voprosy ispol'zovaniya v dokazyvanii po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh v oblasti okhrany okruzhayushchey sredy inykh protokolov, predusmotrennykh KoAP RF, i dokumentov, poluchennykh v rezul'tate osushchestvleniya gosudarstvennogo kontrolya (nadzora) i munitsipal'nogo kontrolya // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2013. - 7. - C. 767 - 769. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2013.7.9057.
Kretov V.V., Sevryugin V.E. O neobkhodimosti ustanovleniya administrativnoy otvetstvennosti za pravonarusheniya v oblasti dorozhnogo khozyaystva Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. - 2015. - 4. - C. 380 - 387. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2015.4.14614.
Lapina M.A., Lokhmanov D.V. K voprosu o sub'ektakh i istochnikakh administrativnoy yurisdiktsii v finansovoy sfere // Finansovoe pravo i upravlenie. - 2014. - 3. - C. 131 - 139. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2014.3.13720.

Correct link to this article:
just copy this link to clipboard